California waiting period and fees not a problem
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
California waiting period and fees not a problem
SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem
For a handgun permit in NC it takes a min of 10 days anyways as the sheriff has to sign off on itip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
it is a stupid rule as it does nothing to stop any violence, people doing violence are not buying the firearm legally
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem
I like it. I like the fees too.cwtcr hokie wrote:For a handgun permit in NC it takes a min of 10 days anyways as the sheriff has to sign off on itip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
it is a stupid rule as it does nothing to stop any violence, people doing violence are not buying the firearm legally
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 3192
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:27 pm
Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem
A "lawyer" that confuses "will not hear the case" with "leaving the laws intact" as if they somehow confirmed it/endorsed it. Interestingip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem
Failure to obtain cert is not an affirmation of the lower court ruling. It sets no precedence. This is law 101 stuff.ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem
My language is correct.USN_Hokie wrote:Failure to obtain cert is not an affirmation of the lower court ruling. It sets no precedence. This is law 101 stuff.ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem
of course, you like paying more taxes, most of us don'tip_law-hokie wrote:I like it. I like the fees too.cwtcr hokie wrote:For a handgun permit in NC it takes a min of 10 days anyways as the sheriff has to sign off on itip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
it is a stupid rule as it does nothing to stop any violence, people doing violence are not buying the firearm legally
you can stroke a check to any gov. entity when you want to, they will not reject it
Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem
If you want to go with awkwardly worded (with a superfluous "affirming") that's fine.ip_law-hokie wrote:My language is correct.USN_Hokie wrote:Failure to obtain cert is not an affirmation of the lower court ruling. It sets no precedence. This is law 101 stuff.ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem
I'll go with you misreading what I typed.USN_Hokie wrote:If you want to go with awkwardly worded (with a superfluous "affirming") that's fine.ip_law-hokie wrote:My language is correct.USN_Hokie wrote:Failure to obtain cert is not an affirmation of the lower court ruling. It sets no precedence. This is law 101 stuff.ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem
But God forbid an ID be required to vote...that’s an unreasonable burden that disenfranchises minorities.ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem
But God forbid an ID be required to vote...that’s an unreasonable burden that disenfranchises minorities.ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem
ip_law-hokie wrote:I like it. I like the fees too.cwtcr hokie wrote:For a handgun permit in NC it takes a min of 10 days anyways as the sheriff has to sign off on itip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
it is a stupid rule as it does nothing to stop any violence, people doing violence are not buying the firearm legally
You're probably fully on board with voter id then.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem
Hokie5150 wrote:But God forbid an ID be required to vote...that’s an unreasonable burden that disenfranchises minorities.ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
Didn't see your post, but yep. Fees are no different than a poll tax.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: California waiting period and fees not a problem
Eh.HokieJoe wrote:Hokie5150 wrote:But God forbid an ID be required to vote...that’s an unreasonable burden that disenfranchises minorities.ip_law-hokie wrote:SC leaves intact appeals court ruling affirming that these gun control measures are constitutional.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 48aa7e777c
Didn't see your post, but yep. Fees are no different than a poll tax.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.