WA: New "Risk Protection Order" law working as expected

USN_Hokie · Post by **USN_Hokie** » Mon Mar 05, 2018 5:33 pm

"Stare menacingly" = no civil rights for you.

http://katu.com/news/nation-world/seatt ... health-law

BigDave · Post by **BigDave** » Mon Mar 05, 2018 5:41 pm

USN_Hokie wrote:"Stare menacingly" = no civil rights for you.

http://katu.com/news/nation-world/seatt ... health-law

Creepy guy with a firearm staring people down through windows. Yeah, I'd rather he not have a gun.

Hokie5150 · Post by **Hokie5150** » Mon Mar 05, 2018 5:41 pm

USN_Hokie wrote:"Stare menacingly" = no civil rights for you.

http://katu.com/news/nation-world/seatt ... health-law

Meh...we'll do "due process" later. What could possibly go wrong?!?

awesome guy · Post by **awesome guy** » Mon Mar 05, 2018 5:43 pm

BigDave wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:"Stare menacingly" = no civil rights for you.

http://katu.com/news/nation-world/seatt ... health-law
Creepy guy with a firearm staring people down through windows. Yeah, I'd rather he not have a gun.

Why should that trample his rights?

USN_Hokie · Post by **USN_Hokie** » Mon Mar 05, 2018 5:52 pm

awesome guy wrote:
BigDave wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:"Stare menacingly" = no civil rights for you.

http://katu.com/news/nation-world/seatt ... health-law
Creepy guy with a firearm staring people down through windows. Yeah, I'd rather he not have a gun.
Why should that trample his rights?

Big Dave stared menacingly at me, and I think he has a gun.

No civil rights for Big Dave.

BigDave · Post by **BigDave** » Mon Mar 05, 2018 6:14 pm

USN_Hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
BigDave wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:"Stare menacingly" = no civil rights for you.

http://katu.com/news/nation-world/seatt ... health-law
Creepy guy with a firearm staring people down through windows. Yeah, I'd rather he not have a gun.
Why should that trample his rights?
Big Dave stared menacingly at me, and I think he has a gun.

No civil rights for Big Dave.

Well, if I stare menacingly at you and a bunch of other people, then the world might be better off if I didn't have a gun.

The freedom of speech doesn't give you the right to shout "fire" in a crowded theater and the right to bear arms doesn't give you the right to intimidate people.

awesome guy · Post by **awesome guy** » Mon Mar 05, 2018 6:20 pm

BigDave wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
BigDave wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:"Stare menacingly" = no civil rights for you.

http://katu.com/news/nation-world/seatt ... health-law
Creepy guy with a firearm staring people down through windows. Yeah, I'd rather he not have a gun.
Why should that trample his rights?
Big Dave stared menacingly at me, and I think he has a gun.

No civil rights for Big Dave.
Well, if I stare menacingly at you and a bunch of other people, then the world might be better off if I didn't have a gun.

The freedom of speech doesn't give you the right to shout "fire" in a crowded theater and the right to bear arms doesn't give you the right to intimidate people.

You can shout "fire" in a crowded theater provided that there is a fire. Likewise I can intimidate with a firearm, that's part of their purpose. You saying "intimidate" when what you really mean is you feel scared.

BigDave · Post by **BigDave** » Mon Mar 05, 2018 7:11 pm

awesome guy wrote:The freedom of speech doesn't give you the right to shout "fire" in a crowded theater and the right to bear arms doesn't give you the right to intimidate people.

You can shout "fire" in a crowded theater provided that there is a fire. Likewise I can intimidate with a firearm, that's part of their purpose. You saying "intimidate" when what you really mean is you feel scared.[/quote]

Staring menacingly at a number of people is not the same as walking down the street minding your own business and someone freaking out at a gun.

awesome guy · Post by **awesome guy** » Mon Mar 05, 2018 7:22 pm

BigDave wrote:
Staring menacingly at a number of people is not the same as walking down the street minding your own business and someone freaking out at a gun.

Sure it is. You're simply using your perception to differentiate. Looking menacingly isn't a crime, even with a gun.

cwtcr hokie · Post by **cwtcr hokie** » Mon Mar 05, 2018 7:30 pm

BigDave wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:"Stare menacingly" = no civil rights for you.

http://katu.com/news/nation-world/seatt ... health-law
Creepy guy with a firearm staring people down through windows. Yeah, I'd rather he not have a gun.

I read the story, what did the guy do? Is he mental? the article does not say that. He walks around with a firearm, so what? Sorry but did he threaten anyone or anything, either verbal or on the internet?

Those folks that were so freaked out may want to stay out of the rural areas during hunting season...... they would be calling the cops every second

USN_Hokie · Post by **USN_Hokie** » Mon Mar 05, 2018 7:53 pm

BigDave wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
BigDave wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:"Stare menacingly" = no civil rights for you.

http://katu.com/news/nation-world/seatt ... health-law
Creepy guy with a firearm staring people down through windows. Yeah, I'd rather he not have a gun.
Why should that trample his rights?
Big Dave stared menacingly at me, and I think he has a gun.

No civil rights for Big Dave.
Well, if I stare menacingly at you and a bunch of other people, then the world might be better off if I didn't have a gun.

The freedom of speech doesn't give you the right to shout "fire" in a crowded theater and the right to bear arms doesn't give you the right to intimidate people.

1. If the 2A only exists until you have offended someone, then it doesn't exist at all. That was my point.

2. Your cliche analogy is not even settled law. It was part of an overturned opinion used to prosecute a man for distributing anti-war flyers 100yrs ago.

USN_Hokie · Post by **USN_Hokie** » Mon Mar 05, 2018 7:55 pm

cwtcr hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:"Stare menacingly" = no civil rights for you.

http://katu.com/news/nation-world/seatt ... health-law
Creepy guy with a firearm staring people down through windows. Yeah, I'd rather he not have a gun.
I read the story, what did the guy do? Is he mental? the article does not say that. He walks around with a firearm, so what? Sorry but did he threaten anyone or anything, either verbal or on the internet?

Those folks that were so freaked out may want to stay out of the rural areas during hunting season...... they would be calling the cops every second

Big Dave thinks every guy who has been turned down for a date should lose his 2A rights.

HokieFanDC · Post by **HokieFanDC** » Mon Mar 05, 2018 7:56 pm

Hokie5150 wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:"Stare menacingly" = no civil rights for you.

http://katu.com/news/nation-world/seatt ... health-law
Meh...we'll do "due process" later. What could possibly go wrong?!?

ERPO, coming to a country near you.

cwtcr hokie · Post by **cwtcr hokie** » Mon Mar 05, 2018 8:31 pm

HokieFanDC wrote:
Hokie5150 wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:"Stare menacingly" = no civil rights for you.

http://katu.com/news/nation-world/seatt ... health-law
Meh...we'll do "due process" later. What could possibly go wrong?!?
ERPO, coming to a country near you.

it goes along with if an allegation is made it must be true and you are to be fired, tarred and feathered and banished to some island in the south pacific.... we are not on a good trend

HokieFanDC · Post by **HokieFanDC** » Mon Mar 05, 2018 9:04 pm

cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
Hokie5150 wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:"Stare menacingly" = no civil rights for you.

http://katu.com/news/nation-world/seatt ... health-law
Meh...we'll do "due process" later. What could possibly go wrong?!?
ERPO, coming to a country near you.
it goes along with if an allegation is made it must be true and you are to be fired, tarred and feathered and banished to some island in the south pacific.... we are not on a good trend

I agree. I'm not the one in favor of guns first, due process later...

Mcl3 Hokie · Post by **Mcl3 Hokie** » Tue Mar 06, 2018 6:48 am

The Tony Montana I remember wouldn’t have been intimidated by a little 25 cal. He would have just said “Let me introduce you to my little friend”.

United We Stand - uwsboard.com

WA: New "Risk Protection Order" law working as expected

WA: New "Risk Protection Order" law working as expected

Re: WA: New "Risk Protection Order" law working as expected

Re: WA: New "Risk Protection Order" law working as expected

Re: WA: New "Risk Protection Order" law working as expected

Re: WA: New

Re: WA: New

Re: WA: New "Risk Protection Order" law working as expected

Re: WA: New

Re: WA: New "Risk Protection Order" law working as expected

Re: WA: New "Risk Protection Order" law working as expected

Re: WA: New

Re: WA: New "Risk Protection Order" law working as expected

Re: WA: New "Risk Protection Order" law working as expected

Re: WA: New "Risk Protection Order" law working as expected

Re: WA: New "Risk Protection Order" law working as expected

Re: WA: New "Risk Protection Order" law working as expected