United We Stand - uwsboard.com

IP: Cops can't be trusted and will abuse power against citizens.

Also IP: Only cops should have guns.

Major Kong wrote:

That's it?

Major Kong wrote:

I'm not seeing the there, there.

USN_Hokie wrote:

Major Kong wrote:

I'm not seeing the there, there.

Maybe he probed her anus with his penis?

ip_law-hokie wrote:https://www.knoxnews.com/story/news/cri ... 387526002/

alot of times they bring in a female to search a female but I don't see anything in the video, he never touched her near her sexual parts and it was done professionally. She was not wearing a seat belt so he had cause to pull her over. But not seeing a case although I bet she gets some cash out of it

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:https://www.knoxnews.com/story/news/cri ... 387526002/

alot of times they bring in a female to search a female but I don't see anything in the video, he never touched her near her sexual parts and it was done professionally. She was not wearing a seat belt so he had cause to pull her over. But not seeing a case although I bet she gets some cash out of it

You guys OK with the pig pulling her over a few hours later near her home?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:You guys OK with the pig pulling her over a few hours later near her home?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If she was too damned dumb to do the same violation again I have absolutely no problem.

Major Kong wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:You guys OK with the pig pulling her over a few hours later near her home?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If she was too damned dumb to do the same violation again I have absolutely no problem.

It was for a different reason.

Lots of pig supporters.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

USN_Hokie wrote:IP: Cops can't be trusted and will abuse power against citizens.

Also IP: Only cops should have guns.

This is incorrect.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:It was for a different reason.

Lots of pig supporters.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So It doesn't matter what the violation was...You screw the pooch you get fingered.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:IP: Cops can't be trusted and will abuse power against citizens.

Also IP: Only cops should have guns.

This is incorrect.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Oh shoot, I forgot to plug socialist healthcare

Major Kong wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:It was for a different reason.

Lots of pig supporters.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So It doesn't matter what the violation was...You screw the pooch you get fingered.

IP is still bitter about that license plate bulb being out on Xmas eve.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:https://www.knoxnews.com/story/news/cri ... 387526002/

alot of times they bring in a female to search a female but I don't see anything in the video, he never touched her near her sexual parts and it was done professionally. She was not wearing a seat belt so he had cause to pull her over. But not seeing a case although I bet she gets some cash out of it

You guys OK with the pig pulling her over a few hours later near her home?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ghetto Manchester people call the police "pigs".

ip_law-hokie wrote:

Major Kong wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:You guys OK with the pig pulling her over a few hours later near her home?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If she was too damned dumb to do the same violation again I have absolutely no problem.

It was for a different reason.

Lots of pig supporters.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I could entertain an argument over whether she should have been searched, but I don't have a problem with the way he searched her from everything I can see. I've suffered worse from TSA agents.

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

Major Kong wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:You guys OK with the pig pulling her over a few hours later near her home?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If she was too damned dumb to do the same violation again I have absolutely no problem.

It was for a different reason.

Lots of pig supporters.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I could entertain an argument over whether she should have been searched, but I don't have a problem with the way he searched her from everything I can see. I've suffered worse from TSA agents.

You are OK with stalking pigs?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

Major Kong wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:You guys OK with the pig pulling her over a few hours later near her home?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If she was too damned dumb to do the same violation again I have absolutely no problem.

It was for a different reason.

Lots of pig supporters.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I could entertain an argument over whether she should have been searched, but I don't have a problem with the way he searched her from everything I can see. I've suffered worse from TSA agents.

You are OK with stalking pigs?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Manchester

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

Major Kong wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:You guys OK with the pig pulling her over a few hours later near her home?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If she was too damned dumb to do the same violation again I have absolutely no problem.

It was for a different reason.

Lots of pig supporters.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I could entertain an argument over whether she should have been searched, but I don't have a problem with the way he searched her from everything I can see. I've suffered worse from TSA agents.

You are OK with stalking pigs?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Are you assuming the cop's gender preferences?

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

Major Kong wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:You guys OK with the pig pulling her over a few hours later near her home?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If she was too damned dumb to do the same violation again I have absolutely no problem.

It was for a different reason.

Lots of pig supporters.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I could entertain an argument over whether she should have been searched, but I don't have a problem with the way he searched her from everything I can see. I've suffered worse from TSA agents.

You are OK with stalking pigs?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Are you assuming the cop's gender preferences?

There's not need for me to assume, or the DA. Pig lovers will do as pig lovers do.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

Major Kong wrote:If she was too damned dumb to do the same violation again I have absolutely no problem.

It was for a different reason.

Lots of pig supporters.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I could entertain an argument over whether she should have been searched, but I don't have a problem with the way he searched her from everything I can see. I've suffered worse from TSA agents.

You are OK with stalking pigs?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Are you assuming the cop's gender preferences?

There's not need for me to assume, or the DA. Pig lovers will do as pig lovers do.

Manchester is gonna meth

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:https://www.knoxnews.com/story/news/cri ... 387526002/

alot of times they bring in a female to search a female but I don't see anything in the video, he never touched her near her sexual parts and it was done professionally. She was not wearing a seat belt so he had cause to pull her over. But not seeing a case although I bet she gets some cash out of it

You guys OK with the pig pulling her over a few hours later near her home?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

so you know he purposely sat there to wait on her, or was that where he was patrolling at the time.... How in the heck would he know she would come home and at what time? Yes cops have pulled people over more than once in a day, it is rare but it can actually happen

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:https://www.knoxnews.com/story/news/cri ... 387526002/

alot of times they bring in a female to search a female but I don't see anything in the video, he never touched her near her sexual parts and it was done professionally. She was not wearing a seat belt so he had cause to pull her over. But not seeing a case although I bet she gets some cash out of it

You guys OK with the pig pulling her over a few hours later near her home?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

so you know he purposely sat there to wait on her, or was that where he was patrolling at the time.... How in the heck would he know she would come home and at what time? Yes cops have pulled people over more than once in a day, it is rare but it can actually happen

Let it go.. it's IPs Schtick - He applauded the Burkha mug shot law suit in NY as well. Special accommodations for Muslim offenders. Imagine if this male cop would have asked a muslim women to show if she was wearing an ankle pistol that could kill him??? OMG "freedom of religion"..

CFB Apologist wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:https://www.knoxnews.com/story/news/cri ... 387526002/

alot of times they bring in a female to search a female but I don't see anything in the video, he never touched her near her sexual parts and it was done professionally. She was not wearing a seat belt so he had cause to pull her over. But not seeing a case although I bet she gets some cash out of it

You guys OK with the pig pulling her over a few hours later near her home?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

so you know he purposely sat there to wait on her, or was that where he was patrolling at the time.... How in the heck would he know she would come home and at what time? Yes cops have pulled people over more than once in a day, it is rare but it can actually happen

Let it go.. it's IPs Schtick - He applauded the Burkha mug shot law suit in NY as well. Special accommodations for Muslim offenders. Imagine if this male cop would have asked a muslim women to show if she was wearing an ankle pistol that could kill him??? OMG "freedom of religion"..

Do you have a link regarding the lawsuit that I supported? It sounds like an interesting case.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:

CFB Apologist wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:https://www.knoxnews.com/story/news/cri ... 387526002/

alot of times they bring in a female to search a female but I don't see anything in the video, he never touched her near her sexual parts and it was done professionally. She was not wearing a seat belt so he had cause to pull her over. But not seeing a case although I bet she gets some cash out of it

You guys OK with the pig pulling her over a few hours later near her home?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

so you know he purposely sat there to wait on her, or was that where he was patrolling at the time.... How in the heck would he know she would come home and at what time? Yes cops have pulled people over more than once in a day, it is rare but it can actually happen

Let it go.. it's IPs Schtick - He applauded the Burkha mug shot law suit in NY as well. Special accommodations for Muslim offenders. Imagine if this male cop would have asked a muslim women to show if she was wearing an ankle pistol that could kill him??? OMG "freedom of religion"..

Do you have a link regarding the lawsuit that I supported? It sounds like an interesting case.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sorry, I thought it was you that applauded. Anyway- you know how it went.. Three women of deep muslim/peaceful faith, were arrested for robbery in NY. when in rome, rob people in a hijiab, I guess. Well, NYPD asked them to remove their face coverings for a mugshot (how insensitive) they refused to do so in the presence of a male officer- a privilege not afforded christian women or normal american women. At any rate, a male took the mugshot, and they sued and were awarded 60K each by an anti-american leftist judge.