Page 1 of 1

VA: ATF investigating candidate for creating illegal gun

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 5:04 pm
by USN_Hokie
...in publicity stunt. :lol:

http://www.wusa9.com/mobile/article/new ... -526898428
Looks like she fell for the lie that it's easier to own a gun than a car. Making your car shorter isn't a felony.

Re: VA: ATF investigating candidate for creating illegal gu

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:58 pm
by HokieJoe
Moron

Re: VA: ATF investigating candidate for creating illegal gu

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 8:05 pm
by HokieFanDC
HokieJoe wrote:Moron
Is she a moron b/c you disagree with her view on gun control, or for what she did?

Destroying a perfectly good gun is stupid, IMO, but she made the gun inoperable before sawing it apart, and then took it to the police station, just like she's supposed to do. She did trigger a lot of gun nuts though.

Re: VA: ATF investigating candidate for creating illegal gu

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 8:21 pm
by USN_Hokie
HokieFanDC wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:Moron
Is she a moron b/c you disagree with her view on gun control, or for what she did?

Destroying a perfectly good gun is stupid, IMO, but she made the gun inoperable before sawing it apart, and then took it to the police station, just like she's supposed to do. She did trigger a lot of gun nuts though.
You seem triggered.

Glad to see you've finished your google course work as a technical agent with the ATF. Could you please explain to me in detail how (in accordance with ATF regulations...be sure to google that too) she made the gun inoperable before she made it into an SBR?

Re: VA: ATF investigating candidate for creating illegal gu

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 8:25 pm
by USN_Hokie
HokieFanDC wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:Moron
Is she a moron b/c you disagree with her view on gun control, or for what she did?

Destroying a perfectly good gun is stupid, IMO, but she made the gun inoperable before sawing it apart, and then took it to the police station, just like she's supposed to do. She did trigger a lot of gun nuts though.
PS - I can tell that the gun is not rendered legally inoperable just by the thumb nail of the video. She created an SBR by her own words in the article.

Re: VA: ATF investigating candidate for creating illegal gu

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 8:49 pm
by HokieFanDC
USN_Hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:Moron
Is she a moron b/c you disagree with her view on gun control, or for what she did?

Destroying a perfectly good gun is stupid, IMO, but she made the gun inoperable before sawing it apart, and then took it to the police station, just like she's supposed to do. She did trigger a lot of gun nuts though.
You seem triggered.

Glad to see you've finished your google course work as a technical agent with the ATF. Could you please explain to me in detail how (in accordance with ATF regulations...be sure to google that too) she made the gun inoperable before she made it into an SBR?
LOL @ triggerd!!!! Who started this thread??? Derp.

I'll skip all the rest of your silliness, and take her word for it. If the ATF wants to say otherwise, then shame on her for lying.
If you want to impart your great knowledge and just tell me what you see that proves it's still operable, then do so. Looks to me like there's no receiver on the rifle, though.

Re: VA: ATF investigating candidate for creating illegal gu

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:02 pm
by USN_Hokie
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:Moron
Is she a moron b/c you disagree with her view on gun control, or for what she did?

Destroying a perfectly good gun is stupid, IMO, but she made the gun inoperable before sawing it apart, and then took it to the police station, just like she's supposed to do. She did trigger a lot of gun nuts though.
You seem triggered.

Glad to see you've finished your google course work as a technical agent with the ATF. Could you please explain to me in detail how (in accordance with ATF regulations...be sure to google that too) she made the gun inoperable before she made it into an SBR?
LOL @ triggerd!!!! Who started this thread??? Derp.

I'll skip all the rest of your silliness, and take her word for it. If the ATF wants to say otherwise, then shame on her for lying.
If you want to impart your great knowledge and just tell me what you see that proves it's still operable, then do so. Looks to me like there's no receiver on the rifle, though.
1. Starting a thread to laugh at a moron is "triggered?" Interesting. :lol:

2. She committed a felony in her own words. Making a gun inoperable (if she even knew how to do it) after you convert it to an illegal configuration is still a crime, Sherlock.

PS - the rifle is in between two boards. It's a complete gun..not that you even know which part is legally the receiver.

Re: VA: ATF investigating candidate for creating illegal gu

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2018 12:17 am
by HokieFanDC
USN_Hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:Moron
Is she a moron b/c you disagree with her view on gun control, or for what she did?

Destroying a perfectly good gun is stupid, IMO, but she made the gun inoperable before sawing it apart, and then took it to the police station, just like she's supposed to do. She did trigger a lot of gun nuts though.
You seem triggered.

Glad to see you've finished your google course work as a technical agent with the ATF. Could you please explain to me in detail how (in accordance with ATF regulations...be sure to google that too) she made the gun inoperable before she made it into an SBR?
LOL @ triggerd!!!! Who started this thread??? Derp.

I'll skip all the rest of your silliness, and take her word for it. If the ATF wants to say otherwise, then shame on her for lying.
If you want to impart your great knowledge and just tell me what you see that proves it's still operable, then do so. Looks to me like there's no receiver on the rifle, though.
1. Starting a thread to laugh at a moron is "triggered?" Interesting. :lol:

2. She committed a felony in her own words. Making a gun inoperable (if she even knew how to do it) after you convert it to an illegal configuration is still a crime, Sherlock.

PS - the rifle is in between two boards. It's a complete gun..not that you even know which part is legally the receiver.
1. Yes.

2. OK, I'll take your word for it. Maybe the ATF will agree, or not.

PS - OK, that's why I said, "Looks to me like".
It would be nice if you could answer a simple question about what makes you sure the gun was operable. You reacted as expected. Woof woof, Pavlov.

Re: VA: ATF investigating candidate for creating illegal gu

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2018 12:28 am
by USN_Hokie
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:Moron
Is she a moron b/c you disagree with her view on gun control, or for what she did?

Destroying a perfectly good gun is stupid, IMO, but she made the gun inoperable before sawing it apart, and then took it to the police station, just like she's supposed to do. She did trigger a lot of gun nuts though.
You seem triggered.

Glad to see you've finished your google course work as a technical agent with the ATF. Could you please explain to me in detail how (in accordance with ATF regulations...be sure to google that too) she made the gun inoperable before she made it into an SBR?
LOL @ triggerd!!!! Who started this thread??? Derp.

I'll skip all the rest of your silliness, and take her word for it. If the ATF wants to say otherwise, then shame on her for lying.
If you want to impart your great knowledge and just tell me what you see that proves it's still operable, then do so. Looks to me like there's no receiver on the rifle, though.
1. Starting a thread to laugh at a moron is "triggered?" Interesting. :lol:

2. She committed a felony in her own words. Making a gun inoperable (if she even knew how to do it) after you convert it to an illegal configuration is still a crime, Sherlock.

PS - the rifle is in between two boards. It's a complete gun..not that you even know which part is legally the receiver.
1. Yes.

2. OK, I'll take your word for it. Maybe the ATF will agree, or not.

PS - OK, that's why I said, "Looks to me like".
It would be nice if you could answer a simple question about what makes you sure the gun was operable. You reacted as expected. Woof woof, Pavlov.
This is the part of the thread where DC subtly asks for breadcrumbs to help him find Google the right answer.

My only point in responding to you was to point out that you were being an ignorant moron while laughing at people for being supposed morons. My work here is done!

Re: VA: ATF investigating candidate for creating illegal gu

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2018 12:58 am
by HokieFanDC
USN_Hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
You seem triggered.

Glad to see you've finished your google course work as a technical agent with the ATF. Could you please explain to me in detail how (in accordance with ATF regulations...be sure to google that too) she made the gun inoperable before she made it into an SBR?
LOL @ triggerd!!!! Who started this thread??? Derp.

I'll skip all the rest of your silliness, and take her word for it. If the ATF wants to say otherwise, then shame on her for lying.
If you want to impart your great knowledge and just tell me what you see that proves it's still operable, then do so. Looks to me like there's no receiver on the rifle, though.
1. Starting a thread to laugh at a moron is "triggered?" Interesting. :lol:

2. She committed a felony in her own words. Making a gun inoperable (if she even knew how to do it) after you convert it to an illegal configuration is still a crime, Sherlock.

PS - the rifle is in between two boards. It's a complete gun..not that you even know which part is legally the receiver.
1. Yes.

2. OK, I'll take your word for it. Maybe the ATF will agree, or not.

PS - OK, that's why I said, "Looks to me like".
It would be nice if you could answer a simple question about what makes you sure the gun was operable. You reacted as expected. Woof woof, Pavlov.
This is the part of the thread where DC subtly asks for breadcrumbs to help him find Google the right answer.

My only point in responding to you was to point out that you were being an ignorant moron while laughing at people for being supposed morons. My work here is done!
Wrong again. I asked YOU a simple question, to get the right answer. Why can't you answer a question instead of being a jackass? If your intent was being a jackass once again, your work for the day is indeed done!!

Re: VA: ATF investigating candidate for creating illegal gu

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2018 4:08 am
by ip_law-hokie
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
You seem triggered.

Glad to see you've finished your google course work as a technical agent with the ATF. Could you please explain to me in detail how (in accordance with ATF regulations...be sure to google that too) she made the gun inoperable before she made it into an SBR?
LOL @ triggerd!!!! Who started this thread??? Derp.

I'll skip all the rest of your silliness, and take her word for it. If the ATF wants to say otherwise, then shame on her for lying.
If you want to impart your great knowledge and just tell me what you see that proves it's still operable, then do so. Looks to me like there's no receiver on the rifle, though.
1. Starting a thread to laugh at a moron is "triggered?" Interesting. :lol:

2. She committed a felony in her own words. Making a gun inoperable (if she even knew how to do it) after you convert it to an illegal configuration is still a crime, Sherlock.

PS - the rifle is in between two boards. It's a complete gun..not that you even know which part is legally the receiver.
1. Yes.

2. OK, I'll take your word for it. Maybe the ATF will agree, or not.

PS - OK, that's why I said, "Looks to me like".
It would be nice if you could answer a simple question about what makes you sure the gun was operable. You reacted as expected. Woof woof, Pavlov.
This is the part of the thread where DC subtly asks for breadcrumbs to help him find Google the right answer.

My only point in responding to you was to point out that you were being an ignorant moron while laughing at people for being supposed morons. My work here is done!
Wrong again. I asked YOU a simple question, to get the right answer. Why can't you answer a question instead of being a jackass? If your intent was being a jackass once again, your work for the day is indeed done!!
Maybe a civility pledge is in order for you two, non-millennial baby making Patriots.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: VA: ATF investigating candidate for creating illegal gu

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2018 5:39 pm
by HokieJoe
HokieFanDC wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:Moron
Is she a moron b/c you disagree with her view on gun control, or for what she did?

Destroying a perfectly good gun is stupid, IMO, but she made the gun inoperable before sawing it apart, and then took it to the police station, just like she's supposed to do. She did trigger a lot of gun nuts though.

Both. She's exactly the type of hand-wringing moron who shouldn't be elected to anything.