United We Stand - uwsboard.com

That's why we have magazine limits for hunting, after all.

I'm a Virginia tech football fan. THUS/ABSOLUTELY I want EVERY other college team to lose every game and all of their players to be hurt with career ending injuries. Because I can't be a Virginia Tech fan AND be anything else.. nope. Just like I can't be a legal hunter AND value the lives of my school age children and their friends.. nope. Liberal logic

I love it. This shirt will hurt him in a few months....badly.
I just hope Rs aren’t so stupid as to run unelectable Corey Stewart.

RiverguyVT wrote:I love it. This shirt will hurt him in a few months....badly.
I just hope Rs aren’t so stupid as to run unelectable Corey Stewart.

The Democrats don't have anything to worry about in Va. The Va GOP will primary out anybody that could win.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:I love it. This shirt will hurt him in a few months....badly.
I just hope Rs aren’t so stupid as to run unelectable Corey Stewart.

The Democrats don't have anything to worry about in Va. The Va GOP will primary out anybody that could win.

They don’t do a primary. They do a convention. Which is why we end up with these awful candidates.

HvilleHokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:I love it. This shirt will hurt him in a few months....badly.
I just hope Rs aren’t so stupid as to run unelectable Corey Stewart.

The Democrats don't have anything to worry about in Va. The Va GOP will primary out anybody that could win.

They don’t do a primary. They do a convention. Which is why we end up with these awful candidates.

Even better. Well played by them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:

HvilleHokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:I love it. This shirt will hurt him in a few months....badly.
I just hope Rs aren’t so stupid as to run unelectable Corey Stewart.

The Democrats don't have anything to worry about in Va. The Va GOP will primary out anybody that could win.

They don’t do a primary. They do a convention. Which is why we end up with these awful candidates.

Even better. Well played by them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's the Hillary Clinton model.

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

HvilleHokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:I love it. This shirt will hurt him in a few months....badly.
I just hope Rs aren’t so stupid as to run unelectable Corey Stewart.

The Democrats don't have anything to worry about in Va. The Va GOP will primary out anybody that could win.

They don’t do a primary. They do a convention. Which is why we end up with these awful candidates.

Even better. Well played by them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's the Hillary Clinton model.

Exactly.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

HvilleHokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:I love it. This shirt will hurt him in a few months....badly.
I just hope Rs aren’t so stupid as to run unelectable Corey Stewart.

The Democrats don't have anything to worry about in Va. The Va GOP will primary out anybody that could win.

They don’t do a primary. They do a convention. Which is why we end up with these awful candidates.

Even better. Well played by them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's the Hillary Clinton model.

Exactly.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Any more sage advice while not having a clue about the fundamentals?

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

HvilleHokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

RiverguyVT wrote:I love it. This shirt will hurt him in a few months....badly.
I just hope Rs aren’t so stupid as to run unelectable Corey Stewart.

The Democrats don't have anything to worry about in Va. The Va GOP will primary out anybody that could win.

They don’t do a primary. They do a convention. Which is why we end up with these awful candidates.

Even better. Well played by them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's the Hillary Clinton model.

Exactly.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What does all this have to do with you guys wanting to give rapists and murderers a sporting chance?

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

HvilleHokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: The Democrats don't have anything to worry about in Va. The Va GOP will primary out anybody that could win.

They don’t do a primary. They do a convention. Which is why we end up with these awful candidates.

Even better. Well played by them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's the Hillary Clinton model.

Exactly.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What does all this have to do with you guys wanting to give rapists and murderers a sporting chance?

I was replying to a comment from Riverguy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote: I was replying to a comment from Riverguy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So what is your opinion on Kaine's argument?

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: I was replying to a comment from Riverguy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So what is your opinion on Kaine's argument?

I'm OK with it.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: I was replying to a comment from Riverguy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So what is your opinion on Kaine's argument?

I'm OK with it.

So you support 10rd magazines for police and military as well then? If not, why?

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: I was replying to a comment from Riverguy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So what is your opinion on Kaine's argument?

Tim Kaine's argument seems silly and meaningless. There are bag limits in most places, and I don't think most hunters are going to start spraying for deer. The magazine limit was probably put in place to shut people up.

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: I was replying to a comment from Riverguy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So what is your opinion on Kaine's argument?

I'm OK with it.

So you support 10rd magazines for police and military as well then? If not, why?

Not sure.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: I was replying to a comment from Riverguy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So what is your opinion on Kaine's argument?

I'm OK with it.

So you support 10rd magazines for police and military as well then? If not, why?

Not sure.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Citizens have "high capacity" magazines for the same reason police and military do. The only difference is that police have no obligation to protect you.

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: I was replying to a comment from Riverguy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So what is your opinion on Kaine's argument?

I'm OK with it.

So you support 10rd magazines for police and military as well then? If not, why?

Not sure.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Citizens have "high capacity" magazines for the same reason police and military do. The only difference is that police have no obligation to protect you.

you are falling into the trap, having an actual discussion with Fester, a poster that does not have the ability to have an actual discussion

cwtcr hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:
So what is your opinion on Kaine's argument?

I'm OK with it.

So you support 10rd magazines for police and military as well then? If not, why?

Not sure.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Citizens have "high capacity" magazines for the same reason police and military do. The only difference is that police have no obligation to protect you.

you are falling into the trap, having an actual discussion with Fester, a poster that does not have the ability to have an actual discussion

I'm giving him a chance to show he's more than a troll.

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: I was replying to a comment from Riverguy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So what is your opinion on Kaine's argument?

I'm OK with it.

So you support 10rd magazines for police and military as well then? If not, why?

Not sure.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Citizens have "high capacity" magazines for the same reason police and military do. The only difference is that police have no obligation to protect you.

OK.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

cwtcr hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote: So what is your opinion on Kaine's argument?

I'm OK with it.

So you support 10rd magazines for police and military as well then? If not, why?

Not sure.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Citizens have "high capacity" magazines for the same reason police and military do. The only difference is that police have no obligation to protect you.

you are falling into the trap, having an actual discussion with Fester, a poster that does not have the ability to have an actual discussion

Well, cwtcr, if you are curious, I support the high capacity bans for civilians presumably called for by Kaine. It would make me more likely to vote for him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk