F these politically correct bleeding hearts. Deport these people.
The bastards in Mexico by now......A preliminary hearing is scheduled for April 2.
http://kdvr.com/2018/03/10/undocumented ... t-of-jail/
The bastards in Mexico by now......A preliminary hearing is scheduled for April 2.
Have heard the Sherrifs DEPT has been told not to work with ICE.HokieJoe wrote:Why in the T total F would an illegal be allowed bond in the first place? Unquestionably, he's a flight risk.
USN_Hokie wrote:The unusuals are strangely absent from this thread.
It’s a given. They’re dreamers and future voters.USN_Hokie wrote:The unusuals are strangely absent from this thread.
more people ignoring our laws....and it is a fact, mexicans cannot drive worth a crap!HokieJoe wrote:Why in the T total F would an illegal be allowed bond in the first place? Unquestionably, he's a flight risk.
I'm not sure about that...civil detainers have been ruled unconstiutional.HokieHam wrote:Have heard the Sherrifs DEPT has been told not to work with ICE.HokieJoe wrote:Why in the T total F would an illegal be allowed bond in the first place? Unquestionably, he's a flight risk.
HokieHam wrote:Have heard the Sherrifs DEPT has been told not to work with ICE.HokieJoe wrote:Why in the T total F would an illegal be allowed bond in the first place? Unquestionably, he's a flight risk.
HokieFanDC wrote:I'm not sure about that...civil detainers have been ruled unconstiutional.HokieHam wrote:Have heard the Sherrifs DEPT has been told not to work with ICE.HokieJoe wrote:Why in the T total F would an illegal be allowed bond in the first place? Unquestionably, he's a flight risk.
But, I don't see how an illegal alien, who is suspected of killing someone, is not considered a major flight risk.
I know they can, but if ICE files a request that is beyond the normal detainer period, it has been ruled an illegal request.HokieJoe wrote:HokieFanDC wrote:I'm not sure about that...civil detainers have been ruled unconstiutional.HokieHam wrote:Have heard the Sherrifs DEPT has been told not to work with ICE.HokieJoe wrote:Why in the T total F would an illegal be allowed bond in the first place? Unquestionably, he's a flight risk.
But, I don't see how an illegal alien, who is suspected of killing someone, is not considered a major flight risk.
ICE can file a written detainer request with local law enforcement agencies. Either way, NO judge should've allowed an illegal alien who is accused of murder to bond out of jail. And people wonder why we have mandatory sentencing guidelines (which aren't always a good thing).
That is absolutely retarded, if true.HokieFanDC wrote:I know they can, but if ICE files a request that is beyond the normal detainer period, it has been ruled an illegal request.HokieJoe wrote:HokieFanDC wrote:I'm not sure about that...civil detainers have been ruled unconstiutional.HokieHam wrote:Have heard the Sherrifs DEPT has been told not to work with ICE.HokieJoe wrote:Why in the T total F would an illegal be allowed bond in the first place? Unquestionably, he's a flight risk.
But, I don't see how an illegal alien, who is suspected of killing someone, is not considered a major flight risk.
ICE can file a written detainer request with local law enforcement agencies. Either way, NO judge should've allowed an illegal alien who is accused of murder to bond out of jail. And people wonder why we have mandatory sentencing guidelines (which aren't always a good thing).
It varies by state. VA gets labeled a sanctuary state because we retain for a couple of days, forgot the exact duration, and then release if ICE doesn't show up on time.USN_Hokie wrote:That is absolutely retarded, if true.HokieFanDC wrote:I know they can, but if ICE files a request that is beyond the normal detainer period, it has been ruled an illegal request.HokieJoe wrote:HokieFanDC wrote:I'm not sure about that...civil detainers have been ruled unconstiutional.HokieHam wrote:Have heard the Sherrifs DEPT has been told not to work with ICE.HokieJoe wrote:Why in the T total F would an illegal be allowed bond in the first place? Unquestionably, he's a flight risk.
But, I don't see how an illegal alien, who is suspected of killing someone, is not considered a major flight risk.
ICE can file a written detainer request with local law enforcement agencies. Either way, NO judge should've allowed an illegal alien who is accused of murder to bond out of jail. And people wonder why we have mandatory sentencing guidelines (which aren't always a good thing).
It's true, and retarded.USN_Hokie wrote:That is absolutely retarded, if true.HokieFanDC wrote:I know they can, but if ICE files a request that is beyond the normal detainer period, it has been ruled an illegal request.HokieJoe wrote:HokieFanDC wrote:I'm not sure about that...civil detainers have been ruled unconstiutional.HokieHam wrote:Have heard the Sherrifs DEPT has been told not to work with ICE.HokieJoe wrote:Why in the T total F would an illegal be allowed bond in the first place? Unquestionably, he's a flight risk.
But, I don't see how an illegal alien, who is suspected of killing someone, is not considered a major flight risk.
ICE can file a written detainer request with local law enforcement agencies. Either way, NO judge should've allowed an illegal alien who is accused of murder to bond out of jail. And people wonder why we have mandatory sentencing guidelines (which aren't always a good thing).
A local radio show was interviewing a former deputy.HokieJoe wrote:HokieHam wrote:Have heard the Sherrifs DEPT has been told not to work with ICE.HokieJoe wrote:Why in the T total F would an illegal be allowed bond in the first place? Unquestionably, he's a flight risk.
By whom?