United We Stand - uwsboard.com

Trump won this rural district by 20 points, and he’s been campaigning there, so I’m guessing it’s just a formality.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:Trump won this rural district by 20 points, and he’s been campaigning there, so I’m guessing it’s just a formality.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well, Saccone has already received the dreaded Trump +1, so I'll predict a narrow victory by The Sham.
Seriously, though, how many people are going to vote in a special election, in a district that won't exist in the November elections?

HokieFanDC wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:Trump won this rural district by 20 points, and he’s been campaigning there, so I’m guessing it’s just a formality.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well, Saccone has already received the dreaded Trump +1, so I'll predict a narrow victory by The Sham.
Seriously, though, how many people are going to vote in a special election, in a district that won't exist in the November elections?

Turn out was very high per Saccone camp.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:Trump won this rural district by 20 points, and he’s been campaigning there, so I’m guessing it’s just a formality.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dem is pro life, pro 2a, anti Pelosi running against a meh R replacing a guy who stepped down after knocking his mistress up and telling her to get an abortion.

Snoozer election. Also, national turnout =/= local turnout. Probably won't know the winner for a few days until the Dems find a trunk full of ballots on the 3rd recount.

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:Trump won this rural district by 20 points, and he’s been campaigning there, so I’m guessing it’s just a formality.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dem is pro life, pro 2a, anti Pelosi running against a meh R replacing a guy who stepped down after knocking his mistress up and telling her to get an abortion.

Snoozer election. Also, national turnout =/= local turnout. Probably won't know the winner for a few days until the Dems find a trunk full of ballots on the 3rd recount.

Got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:Trump won this rural district by 20 points, and he’s been campaigning there, so I’m guessing it’s just a formality.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Have you seen the pub candidate? He looks like a loser.........

HokieHam wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:Trump won this rural district by 20 points, and he’s been campaigning there, so I’m guessing it’s just a formality.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Have you seen the pub candidate? He looks like a loser.........

Nothing to see here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:

HokieHam wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:Trump won this rural district by 20 points, and he’s been campaigning there, so I’m guessing it’s just a formality.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Have you seen the pub candidate? He looks like a loser.........

Nothing to see here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lamb pro-gun, pro-life (personally, not politically), for the Trump tariff, pro tax cut. He isn't anything like the majority of Dems today. He's way to the right of today's Dem party. The likelihood of Dems like him making it past primaries seems slim.

HokieFanDC wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

HokieHam wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:Trump won this rural district by 20 points, and he’s been campaigning there, so I’m guessing it’s just a formality.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Have you seen the pub candidate? He looks like a loser.........

Nothing to see here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lamb pro-gun, pro-life (personally, not politically), for the Trump tariff, pro tax cut. He isn't anything like the majority of Dems today. He's way to the right of today's Dem party. The likelihood of Dems like him making it past primaries seems slim.

LOL- this is a new one- even for Dems. "I personally want to kick out all immigrants and re-instate machine guns..but not
"politically"..lol that is a new form of awesome haha

HokieFanDC wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

HokieHam wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:Trump won this rural district by 20 points, and he’s been campaigning there, so I’m guessing it’s just a formality.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Have you seen the pub candidate? He looks like a loser.........

Nothing to see here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lamb pro-gun, pro-life (personally, not politically), for the Trump tariff, pro tax cut. He isn't anything like the majority of Dems today. He's way to the right of today's Dem party. The likelihood of Dems like him making it past primaries seems slim.

Yup. The Dumbs are throwing out pro life people from their party. But, ip’s got it......

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:Trump won this rural district by 20 points, and he’s been campaigning there, so I’m guessing it’s just a formality.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dem is pro life, pro 2a, anti Pelosi running against a meh R replacing a guy who stepped down after knocking his mistress up and telling her to get an abortion.

Snoozer election. Also, national turnout =/= local turnout. Probably won't know the winner for a few days until the Dems find a trunk full of ballots on the 3rd recount.

and add to that the state is redrawing the district lines and as of next month neither guy will have a district to represent, the seat disappears come January per the re-draw so they will have to run again for the election I assume in Nov with the rest of the elections, the new districts take affect 1/1/19

cwtcr hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:Trump won this rural district by 20 points, and he’s been campaigning there, so I’m guessing it’s just a formality.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dem is pro life, pro 2a, anti Pelosi running against a meh R replacing a guy who stepped down after knocking his mistress up and telling her to get an abortion.

Snoozer election. Also, national turnout =/= local turnout. Probably won't know the winner for a few days until the Dems find a trunk full of ballots on the 3rd recount.

and add to that the state is redrawing the district lines and as of next month neither guy will have a district to represent, the seat disappears come January per the re-draw so they will have to run again for the election I assume in Nov with the rest of the elections, the new districts take affect 1/1/19

That given the case, it is surprising to see the GOP outspend the Democrats. With Trump winning the district by 20, and the GOP losing now, one must question how well Trump is going to do when running against a candidate who is not Hillary Clinton.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:Trump won this rural district by 20 points, and he’s been campaigning there, so I’m guessing it’s just a formality.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dem is pro life, pro 2a, anti Pelosi running against a meh R replacing a guy who stepped down after knocking his mistress up and telling her to get an abortion.

Snoozer election. Also, national turnout =/= local turnout. Probably won't know the winner for a few days until the Dems find a trunk full of ballots on the 3rd recount.

and add to that the state is redrawing the district lines and as of next month neither guy will have a district to represent, the seat disappears come January per the re-draw so they will have to run again for the election I assume in Nov with the rest of the elections, the new districts take affect 1/1/19

That given the case, it is surprising to see the GOP outspend the Democrats. With Trump winning the district by 20, and the GOP losing now, one must question how well Trump is going to do when running against a candidate who is not Hillary Clinton.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

local races are well... local

and from what is being said about the dem that won...the locals elected a republican