United We Stand - uwsboard.com

Way to go Mr. President!

awesome guy wrote:Way to go Mr. President!

but but but he is awful to wimminz

just ask Stormy

This seems like the perfect opportunity for liberals to do some classic projection....i bet that somewhere, there's one claiming Trump put a woman in charge of the CIA so he could manipulate/boss her around.

USN_Hokie wrote:This seems like the perfect opportunity for liberals to do some classic projection....i bet that somewhere, there's one claiming Trump put a woman in charge of the CIA so he could manipulate/boss her around.

She's either a prop or a pussy to grab! Though judging by her pics, prop would be more likely.

Like all things, they're nowhere to be found as politics trumps everything else in their life. They won't celebrate woman ascending because they're full of hatred towards Trump.

Oh that's great...everyone knows a woman can't keep a secret

Major Kong wrote:Oh that's great...everyone knows a woman can't keep a secret

OK that's funny.

USN_Hokie wrote:This seems like the perfect opportunity for liberals to do some classic projection....i bet that somewhere, there's one claiming Trump put a woman in charge of the CIA so he could manipulate/boss her around.

I'm just upset that McMullin wasn't given the job. Not sure why you guys care, the CIA is an evil, statist organization.

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:This seems like the perfect opportunity for liberals to do some classic projection....i bet that somewhere, there's one claiming Trump put a woman in charge of the CIA so he could manipulate/boss her around.

I'm just upset that McMullin wasn't given the job. Not sure why you guys care, the CIA is an evil, statist organization.

Maybe if you pray hard enough to your god, the state...

Perusing the periodicals today...hellsbells are most of 'em unhinged. That can only mean one thing. Trump done good.

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:This seems like the perfect opportunity for liberals to do some classic projection....i bet that somewhere, there's one claiming Trump put a woman in charge of the CIA so he could manipulate/boss her around.

I'm just upset that McMullin wasn't given the job. Not sure why you guys care, the CIA is an evil, statist organization.

Maybe if you pray hard enough to your god, the state...

That would be funnier from someone not employed by the state's military arm....

The crazies are out saying Trump fired Tillerson over speaking out against Russia yesterday! haha. He called off his Africa trip last week kinda quick so he knew then.

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:This seems like the perfect opportunity for liberals to do some classic projection....i bet that somewhere, there's one claiming Trump put a woman in charge of the CIA so he could manipulate/boss her around.

I'm just upset that McMullin wasn't given the job. Not sure why you guys care, the CIA is an evil, statist organization.

Maybe if you pray hard enough to your god, the state...

That would be funnier from someone not employed by the state's military arm....

I’ve always found that interesting too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:This seems like the perfect opportunity for liberals to do some classic projection....i bet that somewhere, there's one claiming Trump put a woman in charge of the CIA so he could manipulate/boss her around.

I'm just upset that McMullin wasn't given the job. Not sure why you guys care, the CIA is an evil, statist organization.

Maybe if you pray hard enough to your god, the state...

That would be funnier from someone not employed by the state's military arm....

Congratulations then, my post achieved maximum levels of funny.

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:This seems like the perfect opportunity for liberals to do some classic projection....i bet that somewhere, there's one claiming Trump put a woman in charge of the CIA so he could manipulate/boss her around.

I'm just upset that McMullin wasn't given the job. Not sure why you guys care, the CIA is an evil, statist organization.

Maybe if you pray hard enough to your god, the state...

That would be funnier from someone not employed by the state's military arm....

Congratulations then, my post achieved maximum levels of funny.

Uh huh. Are you proud of your state service or not, USN?

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:This seems like the perfect opportunity for liberals to do some classic projection....i bet that somewhere, there's one claiming Trump put a woman in charge of the CIA so he could manipulate/boss her around.

I'm just upset that McMullin wasn't given the job. Not sure why you guys care, the CIA is an evil, statist organization.

Maybe if you pray hard enough to your god, the state...

That would be funnier from someone not employed by the state's military arm....

Congratulations then, my post achieved maximum levels of funny.

Uh huh. Are you proud of your state service or not, USN?

I swore an allegiance to a constitution which defends the unalienable rights of man endowed by our creator, not a state. Yes, I'm proud that I took that oath.

Your participation trophy is in the mail.

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote: I'm just upset that McMullin wasn't given the job. Not sure why you guys care, the CIA is an evil, statist organization.

Maybe if you pray hard enough to your god, the state...

That would be funnier from someone not employed by the state's military arm....

Congratulations then, my post achieved maximum levels of funny.

Uh huh. Are you proud of your state service or not, USN?

I swore an allegiance to a constitution which defends the unalienable rights of man endowed by our creator, not a state. Yes, I'm proud that I took that oath.

Your participation trophy is in the mail.

So you were fighting for our creator?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:
Maybe if you pray hard enough to your god, the state...

That would be funnier from someone not employed by the state's military arm....

Congratulations then, my post achieved maximum levels of funny.

Uh huh. Are you proud of your state service or not, USN?

I swore an allegiance to a constitution which defends the unalienable rights of man endowed by our creator, not a state. Yes, I'm proud that I took that oath.

Your participation trophy is in the mail.

LOL, if that makes you sleep better, have at it. Did you ever come across an order from the state who paid you, that you felt morally obliged to disobey?

"I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice."

HokieFanDC wrote:[
LOL, if that makes you sleep better, have at it. Did you ever come across an order from the state who paid you, that you felt morally obliged to disobey?

"I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice."

That's the wrong oath, you ignorant slut.

ip_law-hokie wrote: So you were fighting for our creator?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Google: 1
HokieFanDC: 0

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: So you were fighting for our creator?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Funny.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: So you were fighting for our creator?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Funny.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Is this you?

https://local.theonion.com/resourceful- ... 1819578697

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: So you were fighting for our creator?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Funny.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Is this you?

https://local.theonion.com/resourceful- ... 1819578697

I think you are projecting again, AG. How is the back?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: So you were fighting for our creator?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Funny.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Is this you?

https://local.theonion.com/resourceful- ... 1819578697

I think you are projecting again, AG. How is the back?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm not

USN_Hokie wrote:

HokieFanDC wrote:[
LOL, if that makes you sleep better, have at it. Did you ever come across an order from the state who paid you, that you felt morally obliged to disobey?

"I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice."

That's the wrong oath, you ignorant slut.

What oath are you talking about then. You took that oath, correct? Come on man, you can do it.