Re: Sessions recusal unnecessary?
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2018 6:27 pm
Examples of impropriety: Having a personal relationship with a process server, or serving alcohol at a social event to already inebriated individuals.
https://nacmnet.org/canon-12-avoiding-impropriety.html[/quote]Criminal is the key word you're missing.[/quote]
The standard set forth above is not limited to criminal proceedings.
You guys can have the opinion that Sessions shouldn't have recused himself, but you can never characterize a circumspect, even arguably overly cautious approach to possible ethical pitfalls as being objectively improper. Even the RW article that was originally posted does not make this claim.[/quote]Partisans think it's suspect. Enjoy your witch hunt.[/quote]
I agree with your first sentence. Your second sentence does not make sense to me.[/quote]
Well so far all Mueller has found after a year of spending huge amounts of taxpayer dollars is Obummer and Hillary both used gov. agencies to do unethical and illegal actions, so who is Sessions protecting? Obummer?[/quote]
indicted several people with a few guilty pleas. Right?[/quote]
indicted 13 russians that will never see a US courthouse, Manafort on tax and disclosure charges that will be very difficult to get a conviction on and he bankrupted the security advisor guy(his name flew out of my head) so he plead guilty and is now trying to reverse the plea as more evidence piles up showing what Obummer and Hillary did. Great use of lots and lots of taxpayer dollars
FYI, the farce russian indictments he did are for those mean russian bastards putting crap on facebook, if that was actually a crime everyone on facebook would be in jail right now
https://nacmnet.org/canon-12-avoiding-impropriety.html[/quote]Criminal is the key word you're missing.[/quote]
The standard set forth above is not limited to criminal proceedings.
You guys can have the opinion that Sessions shouldn't have recused himself, but you can never characterize a circumspect, even arguably overly cautious approach to possible ethical pitfalls as being objectively improper. Even the RW article that was originally posted does not make this claim.[/quote]Partisans think it's suspect. Enjoy your witch hunt.[/quote]
I agree with your first sentence. Your second sentence does not make sense to me.[/quote]
Well so far all Mueller has found after a year of spending huge amounts of taxpayer dollars is Obummer and Hillary both used gov. agencies to do unethical and illegal actions, so who is Sessions protecting? Obummer?[/quote]
indicted several people with a few guilty pleas. Right?[/quote]
indicted 13 russians that will never see a US courthouse, Manafort on tax and disclosure charges that will be very difficult to get a conviction on and he bankrupted the security advisor guy(his name flew out of my head) so he plead guilty and is now trying to reverse the plea as more evidence piles up showing what Obummer and Hillary did. Great use of lots and lots of taxpayer dollars
FYI, the farce russian indictments he did are for those mean russian bastards putting crap on facebook, if that was actually a crime everyone on facebook would be in jail right now