I'm OK with you using only a feather, ink, and parchment to exercise 1st amendment rights.ip_law-hokie wrote:I'm OK with muzzle loaders.cwtcr hokie wrote:wow dude, you got so damn used in this thread.... [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]ip_law-hokie wrote:If you were trying to make some technical gun point that will be lost on the majority of the non-gun enthusiast population, I'm happy to concede.CFB Apologist wrote:Well, you missed the pointip_law-hokie wrote:Well . . .CFB Apologist wrote:And twitter blows up with "see it wasn't an AR15, so only the shooter got killed".. lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
yes if he was using a muzzle loader black powder rifle then it would be pretty easy to take him out...... of course that means we would be back over 100 + years ago, so there is that
Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
of course you are, you are clueless on firearmsip_law-hokie wrote:I'm OK with muzzle loaders.cwtcr hokie wrote:wow dude, you got so damn used in this thread....ip_law-hokie wrote:If you were trying to make some technical gun point that will be lost on the majority of the non-gun enthusiast population, I'm happy to concede.CFB Apologist wrote:Well, you missed the pointip_law-hokie wrote:Well . . .CFB Apologist wrote:And twitter blows up with "see it wasn't an AR15, so only the shooter got killed".. lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
yes if he was using a muzzle loader black powder rifle then it would be pretty easy to take him out...... of course that means we would be back over 100 + years ago, so there is that
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
Trollin', trollin', trollin'...
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
Very redneckcwtcr hokie wrote:of course you are, you are clueless on firearmsip_law-hokie wrote:I'm OK with muzzle loaders.cwtcr hokie wrote:wow dude, you got so damn used in this thread....ip_law-hokie wrote:If you were trying to make some technical gun point that will be lost on the majority of the non-gun enthusiast population, I'm happy to concede.CFB Apologist wrote:Well, you missed the pointip_law-hokie wrote: Well . . .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
yes if he was using a muzzle loader black powder rifle then it would be pretty easy to take him out...... of course that means we would be back over 100 + years ago, so there is that
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
Well . . .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
Well, you missed the point[/quote]
If you were trying to make some technical gun point that will be lost on the majority of the non-gun enthusiast population, I'm happy to concede.[/quote]
wow dude, you got so damn used in this thread....
yes if he was using a muzzle loader black powder rifle then it would be pretty easy to take him out...... of course that means we would be back over 100 + years ago, so there is that[/quote]
I'm OK with muzzle loaders.[/quote]
of course you are, you are clueless on firearms[/quote]
Very redneck
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
got it Uncle Fester ( as I said, unable to actually have a conversation...sad)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
Well, you missed the point[/quote]
If you were trying to make some technical gun point that will be lost on the majority of the non-gun enthusiast population, I'm happy to concede.[/quote]
wow dude, you got so damn used in this thread....
yes if he was using a muzzle loader black powder rifle then it would be pretty easy to take him out...... of course that means we would be back over 100 + years ago, so there is that[/quote]
I'm OK with muzzle loaders.[/quote]
of course you are, you are clueless on firearms[/quote]
Very redneck
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
got it Uncle Fester ( as I said, unable to actually have a conversation...sad)
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
Well, you missed the point[/quote]cwtcr hokie wrote:Well . . .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you were trying to make some technical gun point that will be lost on the majority of the non-gun enthusiast population, I'm happy to concede.[/quote]
wow dude, you got so damn used in this thread....
yes if he was using a muzzle loader black powder rifle then it would be pretty easy to take him out...... of course that means we would be back over 100 + years ago, so there is that[/quote]
I'm OK with muzzle loaders.[/quote]
of course you are, you are clueless on firearms[/quote]
Very redneck
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
got it Uncle Fester ( as I said, unable to actually have a conversation...sad)[/quote]
I don't profess to be an expert on firearms, cwtcr.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
Yep, having an opinion and not caring about facts is super redneck, the hallmark of a redneck.ip_law-hokie wrote:Very redneckcwtcr hokie wrote:of course you are, you are clueless on firearmsip_law-hokie wrote:I'm OK with muzzle loaders.cwtcr hokie wrote:wow dude, you got so damn used in this thread.... [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]ip_law-hokie wrote:If you were trying to make some technical gun point that will be lost on the majority of the non-gun enthusiast population, I'm happy to concede.CFB Apologist wrote: Well, you missed the point
yes if he was using a muzzle loader black powder rifle then it would be pretty easy to take him out...... of course that means we would be back over 100 + years ago, so there is that
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
res ipso loquiturawesome guy wrote:ip_law-hokie wrote:cwtcr hokie wrote:Yep, having an opinion and not caring about facts is super redneck, the hallmark of a redneck.ip_law-hokie wrote:
Very redneck
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
ip_law-hokie wrote:res ipso loquiturawesome guy wrote:ip_law-hokie wrote:cwtcr hokie wrote:Yep, having an opinion and not caring about facts is super redneck, the hallmark of a redneck.ip_law-hokie wrote:
Very redneck
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm sure many brave Salemites uttered the same phrase during the witch hunt. Congrats on signaling your neo-puritanical world view to the board ip.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- Major Kong
- Posts: 15761
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:35 pm
- Alma Mater: Ferrum VT ASU
- Party: Independent
- Location: Somewhere between Marion and Seven Mile Ford
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
So you're trying to say the event in Maryland was an accident or you replying to this thread was an accidentip_law-hokie wrote:res ipso loquitur
I only post using 100% recycled electrons.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
The results of the NRA-approved gun control efforts should speak for themselves.Major Kong wrote:So you're trying to say the event in Maryland was an accident or you replying to this thread was an accidentip_law-hokie wrote:res ipso loquitur
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
the kid today used a handgun..... you do realize he could not legally buy it, don't you. And darn it he could not get a concealed carry permit so he was breaking all kinds of laws, sum beatchip_law-hokie wrote:The results of the NRA-approved gun control efforts should speak for themselves.Major Kong wrote:So you're trying to say the event in Maryland was an accident or you replying to this thread was an accidentip_law-hokie wrote:res ipso loquitur
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
it is hilarious you keep coming back for more, dang son, glutton for punishment
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
OK. My discussion was not based on this case. I don’t know the details.cwtcr hokie wrote:the kid today used a handgun..... you do realize he could not legally buy it, don't youip_law-hokie wrote:The results of the NRA-approved gun control efforts should speak for themselves.Major Kong wrote:So you're trying to say the event in Maryland was an accident or you replying to this thread was an accidentip_law-hokie wrote:res ipso loquitur
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
OK.cwtcr hokie wrote:the kid today used a handgun..... you do realize he could not legally buy it, don't you. And darn it he could not get a concealed carry permit so he was breaking all kinds of laws, sum beatchip_law-hokie wrote:The results of the NRA-approved gun control efforts should speak for themselves.Major Kong wrote:So you're trying to say the event in Maryland was an accident or you replying to this thread was an accidentip_law-hokie wrote:res ipso loquitur
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
it is hilarious you keep coming back for more, dang son, glutton for punishment
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
FYI, the NRA does not approve of murder or assaulting anyone with any weapon, wether that be a firearm, a vehicle, a knife, a rock, etc etc etc., so what is your point?ip_law-hokie wrote:OK. My discussion was not based on this case. I don’t know the details.cwtcr hokie wrote:the kid today used a handgun..... you do realize he could not legally buy it, don't youip_law-hokie wrote:The results of the NRA-approved gun control efforts should speak for themselves.Major Kong wrote:So you're trying to say the event in Maryland was an accident or you replying to this thread was an accidentip_law-hokie wrote:res ipso loquitur
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So yes it is a great plan, kill the rights of the other 99% of gun owners due to criminals not respecting our laws or human life.....great plan
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
I like the idea of strict liability. Have guns registered to first-time purchasers. All acts of violence committed by that gun are the responsibility of the gun owner.cwtcr hokie wrote:FYI, the NRA does not approve of murder or assaulting anyone with any weapon, wether that be a firearm, a vehicle, a knife, a rock, etc etc etc., so what is your point?ip_law-hokie wrote:OK. My discussion was not based on this case. I don’t know the details.cwtcr hokie wrote:the kid today used a handgun..... you do realize he could not legally buy it, don't youip_law-hokie wrote:The results of the NRA-approved gun control efforts should speak for themselves.Major Kong wrote:So you're trying to say the event in Maryland was an accident or you replying to this thread was an accidentip_law-hokie wrote:res ipso loquitur
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So yes it is a great plan, kill the rights of the other 99% of gun owners due to criminals not respecting our laws or human life.....great plan
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
The results of the NRA-approved gun control efforts should speak for themselves.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
the kid today used a handgun..... you do realize he could not legally buy it, don't you[/quote]
OK. My discussion was not based on this case. I don’t know the details.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
FYI, the NRA does not approve of murder or assaulting anyone with any weapon, wether that be a firearm, a vehicle, a knife, a rock, etc etc etc., so what is your point?
So yes it is a great plan, kill the rights of the other 99% of gun owners due to criminals not respecting our laws or human life.....great plan[/quote]
I like the idea of strict liability. Have guns registered to first-time purchasers. All acts of violence committed by that gun are the responsibility of the gun owner.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
Huh? do you use the same logic with vehicles? what if the gun is sold or stolen? You blame the owner and not the criminal for committing a crime, interesting. Again a firearm is just a hunk of metal unless a human operates it.... same as most other objects on the planet
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
the kid today used a handgun..... you do realize he could not legally buy it, don't you[/quote]
OK. My discussion was not based on this case. I don’t know the details.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
FYI, the NRA does not approve of murder or assaulting anyone with any weapon, wether that be a firearm, a vehicle, a knife, a rock, etc etc etc., so what is your point?
So yes it is a great plan, kill the rights of the other 99% of gun owners due to criminals not respecting our laws or human life.....great plan[/quote]
I like the idea of strict liability. Have guns registered to first-time purchasers. All acts of violence committed by that gun are the responsibility of the gun owner.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
Huh? do you use the same logic with vehicles? what if the gun is sold or stolen? You blame the owner and not the criminal for committing a crime, interesting. Again a firearm is just a hunk of metal unless a human operates it.... same as most other objects on the planet
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
the kid today used a handgun..... you do realize he could not legally buy it, don't you[/quote]cwtcr hokie wrote:The results of the NRA-approved gun control efforts should speak for themselves.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OK. My discussion was not based on this case. I don’t know the details.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
FYI, the NRA does not approve of murder or assaulting anyone with any weapon, wether that be a firearm, a vehicle, a knife, a rock, etc etc etc., so what is your point?
So yes it is a great plan, kill the rights of the other 99% of gun owners due to criminals not respecting our laws or human life.....great plan[/quote]
I like the idea of strict liability. Have guns registered to first-time purchasers. All acts of violence committed by that gun are the responsibility of the gun owner.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
Huh? do you use the same logic with vehicles? what if the gun is sold or stolen? You blame the owner and not the criminal for committing a crime, interesting. Again a firearm is just a hunk of metal unless a human operates it.... same as most other objects on the planet[/quote]
Different rules for guns. I blame both the owner and the criminal. They can be joint and severally liable.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
the kid today used a handgun..... you do realize he could not legally buy it, don't you[/quote]cwtcr hokie wrote:The results of the NRA-approved gun control efforts should speak for themselves.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OK. My discussion was not based on this case. I don’t know the details.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
FYI, the NRA does not approve of murder or assaulting anyone with any weapon, wether that be a firearm, a vehicle, a knife, a rock, etc etc etc., so what is your point?
So yes it is a great plan, kill the rights of the other 99% of gun owners due to criminals not respecting our laws or human life.....great plan[/quote]
I like the idea of strict liability. Have guns registered to first-time purchasers. All acts of violence committed by that gun are the responsibility of the gun owner.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
Huh? do you use the same logic with vehicles? what if the gun is sold or stolen? You blame the owner and not the criminal for committing a crime, interesting. Again a firearm is just a hunk of metal unless a human operates it.... same as most other objects on the planet[/quote]
Holding someone liable for a sold or stolen gun is ludicrous, but the idea of using the same rules as cars, ie reporting them sold or stolen, might be reasonable, no? I mean, since you like to compare the two.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
Their policy prevented a slaughter today. How have your gun free zones worked?ip_law-hokie wrote:The results of the NRA-approved gun control efforts should speak for themselves.Major Kong wrote:So you're trying to say the event in Maryland was an accident or you replying to this thread was an accidentip_law-hokie wrote:res ipso loquitur
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
OK. My discussion was not based on this case. I don’t know the details.HokieFanDC wrote:the kid today used a handgun..... you do realize he could not legally buy it, don't youcwtcr hokie wrote:The results of the NRA-approved gun control efforts should speak for themselves.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
FYI, the NRA does not approve of murder or assaulting anyone with any weapon, wether that be a firearm, a vehicle, a knife, a rock, etc etc etc., so what is your point?
So yes it is a great plan, kill the rights of the other 99% of gun owners due to criminals not respecting our laws or human life.....great plan[/quote]
I like the idea of strict liability. Have guns registered to first-time purchasers. All acts of violence committed by that gun are the responsibility of the gun owner.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
Huh? do you use the same logic with vehicles? what if the gun is sold or stolen? You blame the owner and not the criminal for committing a crime, interesting. Again a firearm is just a hunk of metal unless a human operates it.... same as most other objects on the planet[/quote]
Holding someone liable for a sold or stolen gun is ludicrous, but the idea of using the same rules as cars, ie reporting them sold or stolen, might be reasonable, no? I mean, since you like to compare the two.[/quote]
It's a good start.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
Silly postip_law-hokie wrote:I like the idea of strict liability. Have guns registered to first-time purchasers. All acts of violence committed by that gun are the responsibility of the gun owner.cwtcr hokie wrote:FYI, the NRA does not approve of murder or assaulting anyone with any weapon, wether that be a firearm, a vehicle, a knife, a rock, etc etc etc., so what is your point?ip_law-hokie wrote:OK. My discussion was not based on this case. I don’t know the details.cwtcr hokie wrote:the kid today used a handgun..... you do realize he could not legally buy it, don't youip_law-hokie wrote:The results of the NRA-approved gun control efforts should speak for themselves.Major Kong wrote:So you're trying to say the event in Maryland was an accident or you replying to this thread was an accident
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So yes it is a great plan, kill the rights of the other 99% of gun owners due to criminals not respecting our laws or human life.....great plan
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 11220
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
That right there is the attitude of gun enthusiasts that is making resonable discussions on the national level difficult. Smugness, and disdain for anyone not fully conversant in the minutae of various guns and terminology.awesome guy wrote:Then STFUip_law-hokie wrote:I don't care to associate myself with guns, or care to learn of their details.awesome guy wrote:"Technical" aka you're FOS.ip_law-hokie wrote:If you were trying to make some technical gun point that will be lost on the majority of the non-gun enthusiast population, I'm happy to concede.CFB Apologist wrote:
Well, you missed the point
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
Correct.133743Hokie wrote:That right there is the attitude of gun enthusiasts that is making resonable discussions on the national level difficult. Smugness, and disdain for anyone not fully conversant in the minutae of various guns and terminology.awesome guy wrote:Then STFUip_law-hokie wrote:I don't care to associate myself with guns, or care to learn of their details.awesome guy wrote:"Technical" aka you're FOS.ip_law-hokie wrote:If you were trying to make some technical gun point that will be lost on the majority of the non-gun enthusiast population, I'm happy to concede.CFB Apologist wrote:
Well, you missed the point
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.