Resource Officer takes out the bad guy...
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2018 4:30 pm
Virginia Tech fans discussing politics, religion, and football
https://uwsboard.com/
Well . . .CFB Apologist wrote:And twitter blows up with "see it wasn't an AR15, so only the shooter got killed".. lol
It's a great argument for an ignoramus.ip_law-hokie wrote:Well . . .CFB Apologist wrote:And twitter blows up with "see it wasn't an AR15, so only the shooter got killed".. lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You just don’t “got it”......ip_law-hokie wrote:Well . . .CFB Apologist wrote:And twitter blows up with "see it wasn't an AR15, so only the shooter got killed".. lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don’t know the details of the latest shooting, but are you guys unwilling to acknowledge that it is easier to disarm a rifle than an AR-15?HokieHam wrote:You just don’t “got it”......ip_law-hokie wrote:Well . . .CFB Apologist wrote:And twitter blows up with "see it wasn't an AR15, so only the shooter got killed".. lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Waht An AR-15 is a rifle.ip_law-hokie wrote:I don’t know the details of the latest shooting, but are you guys unwilling to acknowledge that it is easier to disarm a rifle than an AR-15?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OK. a single shot rifleMajor Kong wrote:Waht An AR-15 is a rifle.ip_law-hokie wrote:I don’t know the details of the latest shooting, but are you guys unwilling to acknowledge that it is easier to disarm a rifle than an AR-15?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're not even trying. Go have a cup of coffee and come back. The AR-15 is a single shot rifle...as are all semi-automatic weapons. One bullet per pull of the trigger.ip_law-hokie wrote:OK. a single shot rifleMajor Kong wrote:Waht An AR-15 is a rifle.ip_law-hokie wrote:I don’t know the details of the latest shooting, but are you guys unwilling to acknowledge that it is easier to disarm a rifle than an AR-15?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OK. I don't try to keep up with that redneck excrement.Hokie5150 wrote:You're not even trying. Go have a cup of coffee and come back. The AR-15 is a single shot rifle...as are all semi-automatic weapons. One bullet per pull of the trigger.ip_law-hokie wrote:OK. a single shot rifleMajor Kong wrote:Waht An AR-15 is a rifle.ip_law-hokie wrote:I don’t know the details of the latest shooting, but are you guys unwilling to acknowledge that it is easier to disarm a rifle than an AR-15?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
An AR15 is a rifle you dope.ip_law-hokie wrote:I don’t know the details of the latest shooting, but are you guys unwilling to acknowledge that it is easier to disarm a rifle than an AR-15?HokieHam wrote:You just don’t “got it”......ip_law-hokie wrote:Well . . .CFB Apologist wrote:And twitter blows up with "see it wasn't an AR15, so only the shooter got killed".. lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Exactly so step aside and let people that actually know about guns handle this topic and future gun laws. You and Mathhew Hogg go hang out at the playground while adults handle this. Thanksip_law-hokie wrote:OK. I don't try to keep up with that redneck excrement.Hokie5150 wrote:You're not even trying. Go have a cup of coffee and come back. The AR-15 is a single shot rifle...as are all semi-automatic weapons. One bullet per pull of the trigger.ip_law-hokie wrote:OK. a single shot rifleMajor Kong wrote:Waht An AR-15 is a rifle.ip_law-hokie wrote:I don’t know the details of the latest shooting, but are you guys unwilling to acknowledge that it is easier to disarm a rifle than an AR-15?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well, you missed the pointip_law-hokie wrote:Well . . .CFB Apologist wrote:And twitter blows up with "see it wasn't an AR15, so only the shooter got killed".. lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you were trying to make some technical gun point that will be lost on the majority of the non-gun enthusiast population, I'm happy to concede.CFB Apologist wrote:Well, you missed the pointip_law-hokie wrote:Well . . .CFB Apologist wrote:And twitter blows up with "see it wasn't an AR15, so only the shooter got killed".. lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nah. You guys haven't done a good job so far.CFB Apologist wrote:Exactly so step aside and let people that actually know about guns handle this topic and future gun laws. You and Mathhew Hogg go hang out at the playground while adults handle this. Thanksip_law-hokie wrote:OK. I don't try to keep up with that redneck excrement.Hokie5150 wrote:You're not even trying. Go have a cup of coffee and come back. The AR-15 is a single shot rifle...as are all semi-automatic weapons. One bullet per pull of the trigger.ip_law-hokie wrote:OK. a single shot rifleMajor Kong wrote:Waht An AR-15 is a rifle.ip_law-hokie wrote:I don’t know the details of the latest shooting, but are you guys unwilling to acknowledge that it is easier to disarm a rifle than an AR-15?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"Technical" aka you're FOS.ip_law-hokie wrote:If you were trying to make some technical gun point that will be lost on the majority of the non-gun enthusiast population, I'm happy to concede.CFB Apologist wrote:Well, you missed the pointip_law-hokie wrote:Well . . .CFB Apologist wrote:And twitter blows up with "see it wasn't an AR15, so only the shooter got killed".. lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't care to associate myself with guns, or care to learn of their details.awesome guy wrote:"Technical" aka you're FOS.ip_law-hokie wrote:If you were trying to make some technical gun point that will be lost on the majority of the non-gun enthusiast population, I'm happy to concede.CFB Apologist wrote:Well, you missed the pointip_law-hokie wrote:Well . . .CFB Apologist wrote:And twitter blows up with "see it wasn't an AR15, so only the shooter got killed".. lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Then STFUip_law-hokie wrote:I don't care to associate myself with guns, or care to learn of their details.awesome guy wrote:"Technical" aka you're FOS.ip_law-hokie wrote:If you were trying to make some technical gun point that will be lost on the majority of the non-gun enthusiast population, I'm happy to concede.CFB Apologist wrote:Well, you missed the pointip_law-hokie wrote:Well . . .CFB Apologist wrote:And twitter blows up with "see it wasn't an AR15, so only the shooter got killed".. lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You’ve just proven you are a terminal hand wringer who knows zilch about what you are talking about.ip_law-hokie wrote:Nah. You guys haven't done a good job so far.
Nah.awesome guy wrote:Then STFUip_law-hokie wrote:I don't care to associate myself with guns, or care to learn of their details.awesome guy wrote:"Technical" aka you're FOS.ip_law-hokie wrote:If you were trying to make some technical gun point that will be lost on the majority of the non-gun enthusiast population, I'm happy to concede.CFB Apologist wrote:Well, you missed the pointip_law-hokie wrote: Well . . .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OK.HokieHam wrote:You’ve just proven you are a terminal hand wringer who knows zilch about what you are talking about.ip_law-hokie wrote:Nah. You guys haven't done a good job so far.
Stay pissed. An intelligent person obtains facts before forming an opinion. You have the opinion first.ip_law-hokie wrote:Nah.awesome guy wrote:Then STFUip_law-hokie wrote:I don't care to associate myself with guns, or care to learn of their details.awesome guy wrote:"Technical" aka you're FOS.ip_law-hokie wrote:If you were trying to make some technical gun point that will be lost on the majority of the non-gun enthusiast population, I'm happy to concede.CFB Apologist wrote: Well, you missed the point
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
wow dude, you got so damn used in this thread....ip_law-hokie wrote:If you were trying to make some technical gun point that will be lost on the majority of the non-gun enthusiast population, I'm happy to concede.CFB Apologist wrote:Well, you missed the pointip_law-hokie wrote:Well . . .CFB Apologist wrote:And twitter blows up with "see it wasn't an AR15, so only the shooter got killed".. lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm OK with muzzle loaders.cwtcr hokie wrote:wow dude, you got so damn used in this thread....ip_law-hokie wrote:If you were trying to make some technical gun point that will be lost on the majority of the non-gun enthusiast population, I'm happy to concede.CFB Apologist wrote:Well, you missed the pointip_law-hokie wrote:Well . . .CFB Apologist wrote:And twitter blows up with "see it wasn't an AR15, so only the shooter got killed".. lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
yes if he was using a muzzle loader black powder rifle then it would be pretty easy to take him out...... of course that means we would be back over 100 + years ago, so there is that
and yet you want to get rid of our second amendment..... effing hilariousip_law-hokie wrote:I don't care to associate myself with guns, or care to learn of their details.awesome guy wrote:"Technical" aka you're FOS.ip_law-hokie wrote:If you were trying to make some technical gun point that will be lost on the majority of the non-gun enthusiast population, I'm happy to concede.CFB Apologist wrote:Well, you missed the pointip_law-hokie wrote:Well . . .CFB Apologist wrote:And twitter blows up with "see it wasn't an AR15, so only the shooter got killed".. lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk