Could get interesting. Ca city opts out of sanctuary laws.

Your Virginia Tech Politics and Religion source
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Post Reply
oaktonhokie
Posts: 11324
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 8:48 pm

Could get interesting. Ca city opts out of sanctuary laws.

Post by oaktonhokie »

Cows will be had, because a city cannot go against state law.

Why, that would be like a state not enforcing federal law.

Sanctuary much.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/03/20/t ... law?page=1
If you bend over backwards long enough,
eventually you'll fall down.
User avatar
UpstateSCHokie
Posts: 11907
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:31 pm

Re: Could get interesting. Ca city opts out of sanctuary law

Post by UpstateSCHokie »

oaktonhokie wrote:Cows will be had, because a city cannot go against state law.

Why, that would be like a state not enforcing federal law.

Sanctuary much.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/03/20/t ... law?page=1
Probably because they are starting to realize just how dangerous this California sanctuary law/policy really is. Of course most CA politicians couldn't give a rat's ass about the safety & security of its legal born citizens. All they care about is importing more 3rd world votes.
Border patrol agents are refusing to hand over illegal immigrants with felony warrants to police in California because they can’t be sure local authorities will return the criminal aliens to federal custody, according to a top border security official in San Diego.

Rodney Scott, the chief patrol agent in the Border Patrol’s San Diego Sector, said earlier this month that California’s statewide sanctuary law was undermining normal cooperation between his agency and local law enforcement.

In a little-reported declaration in support of the Department of Justice’s March 6 lawsuit against California, Scott recalled multiple instances in which a Border Patrol agent in the San Diego sector determined that releasing a criminal alien to a local law enforcement would likely result in the person being released without notification to federal authorities.

“In each instance, the Border Patrol Agent determined it was not appropriate, consistent with his or her federal responsibilities to ensure the enforcement of immigration law, to release a criminal alien to the state and local law enforcement,” Scott said in a court declaration. “This was because, although the alien was subject to removal, if released to California law enforcement, the alien would ultimately be released into the public.”
http://dailycaller.com/2018/03/20/borde ... se-felons/
Image

“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” ― Voltaire (1694 – 1778)
ElbertoHokie
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 4:24 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Independent

Re: Could get interesting. Ca city opts out of sanctuary law

Post by ElbertoHokie »

oaktonhokie wrote:Cows will be had, because a city cannot go against state law.

Why, that would be like a state not enforcing federal law.

Sanctuary much.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/03/20/t ... law?page=1
It's in Orange county, the last Republican bastion of SoCal. Not surprising a locale is trying to.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Could get interesting. Ca city opts out of sanctuary law

Post by ip_law-hokie »

ElbertoHokie wrote:
oaktonhokie wrote:Cows will be had, because a city cannot go against state law.

Why, that would be like a state not enforcing federal law.

Sanctuary much.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/03/20/t ... law?page=1
It's in Orange county, the last Republican bastion of SoCal. Not surprising a locale is trying to.
Orange County is NJ with more traffic and palm trees.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
Post Reply