Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Your Virginia Tech Politics and Religion source
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
nolanvt
Posts: 13116
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:01 pm
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.

Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by nolanvt »

Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.

http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
Mcl3 Hokie
Posts: 1479
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by Mcl3 Hokie »

She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.

http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
nolanvt
Posts: 13116
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:01 pm
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by nolanvt »

Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.

http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
Mcl3 Hokie
Posts: 1479
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by Mcl3 Hokie »

She wasn’t out of line. It’s the pussyhat wearing crowd that find it offensive. He’s such a little twerp that I put under the category of can dish it out, but he can’t take it.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.

http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by awesome guy »

Yep. Camera Hogg comes from the same mold as Nolan. Even the left thinks he's dumb as he can't even get into the UC system. He'll end up at CSUN or San Marcus, if he really wants to live in CA. He'd fit right in, not sure why they won't accept him.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She wasn’t out of line. It’s the pussyhat wearing crowd that find it offensive. He’s such a little twerp that I put under the category of can dish it out, but he can’t take it.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.

http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
USN_Hokie
Posts: 30831
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:58 pm
Party: Draintheswamp

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by USN_Hokie »

awesome guy wrote:Yep. Camera Hogg comes from the same mold as Nolan. Even the left thinks he's dumb as he can't even get into the UC system. He'll end up at CSUN or San Marcus, if he really wants to live in CA. He'd fit right in, not sure why they won't accept him.
He sounds like a real rock. Saw that he was complaining about "not testing well" for his low SAT scores and not getting into any decent schools.
User avatar
HokieHam
Posts: 26526
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by HokieHam »

nolanvt wrote:Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.

http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bull. This kid is running around saying NRA members have blood on their hands. He’s nothing but a useful idiot of Soros and other leftist orgs. If you enter the political arena, you are fair game. Screw this kid and his 15 minutes of fame.
Image
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."

ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
nolanvt
Posts: 13116
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:01 pm
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by nolanvt »

Ingraham shouldn’t have apologized then.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She wasn’t out of line. It’s the pussyhat wearing crowd that find it offensive. He’s such a little twerp that I put under the category of can dish it out, but he can’t take it.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.

http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
Mcl3 Hokie
Posts: 1479
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by Mcl3 Hokie »

It’s a classic case of the bullee having to apologize to the bully. I wouldn’t have apologized.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham shouldn’t have apologized then.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She wasn’t out of line. It’s the pussyhat wearing crowd that find it offensive. He’s such a little twerp that I put under the category of can dish it out, but he can’t take it.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.

http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
nolanvt
Posts: 13116
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:01 pm
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by nolanvt »

Given who she is, the attack did cross a line, but the apology should be enough. I think Fox and her advertisers should just let this cool over and proceed from there.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:It’s a classic case of the bullee having to apologize to the bully. I wouldn’t have apologized.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham shouldn’t have apologized then.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She wasn’t out of line. It’s the pussyhat wearing crowd that find it offensive. He’s such a little twerp that I put under the category of can dish it out, but he can’t take it.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.

http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by awesome guy »

Mcl3 Hokie wrote:It’s a classic case of the bullee having to apologize to the bully. I wouldn’t have apologized.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham shouldn’t have apologized then.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She wasn’t out of line. It’s the pussyhat wearing crowd that find it offensive. He’s such a little twerp that I put under the category of can dish it out, but he can’t take it.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.

http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Correct
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
Mcl3 Hokie
Posts: 1479
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by Mcl3 Hokie »

Ok, take her tweet and tell me what specifically is wrong with it.

quote="nolanvt"]Given who she is, the attack did cross a line, but the apology should be enough. I think Fox and her advertisers should just let this cool over and proceed from there.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:It’s a classic case of the bullee having to apologize to the bully. I wouldn’t have apologized.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham shouldn’t have apologized then.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She wasn’t out of line. It’s the pussyhat wearing crowd that find it offensive. He’s such a little twerp that I put under the category of can dish it out, but he can’t take it.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.

http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
HokieJoe
Posts: 13141
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:12 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Eclectic

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by HokieJoe »

Hogg chose to interject himself into the public debate over gun ownership; and he's doing a fantastic job of ensuring that the Democrat-Socialists pick up fewer seats in November.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by ip_law-hokie »

HokieJoe wrote:Hogg chose to interject himself into the public debate over gun ownership; and he's doing a fantastic job of ensuring that the Democrat-Socialists pick up fewer seats in November.
The NRA is polling at a negative approval rating.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
HokieHam
Posts: 26526
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by HokieHam »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:Hogg chose to interject himself into the public debate over gun ownership; and he's doing a fantastic job of ensuring that the Democrat-Socialists pick up fewer seats in November.
The NRA is polling at a negative approval rating.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
By the same pollsters who said Killary would win?

They are also having a huge influx in membership.
Image
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."

ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
cwtcr hokie
Posts: 13399
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by cwtcr hokie »

nolanvt wrote:Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.

http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
She pointed out facts, so facts are wrong... please explain. Yes she went after a piss ant dude that has been running around cussing out anyone over 18 and proclaiming that he has lived such a long life and has such incredible wisdom that he knows way more than any actual adult alive. The guy is an a-hole, just call him hedge hogg
cwtcr hokie
Posts: 13399
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by cwtcr hokie »

nolanvt wrote:Ingraham shouldn’t have apologized then.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She wasn’t out of line. It’s the pussyhat wearing crowd that find it offensive. He’s such a little twerp that I put under the category of can dish it out, but he can’t take it.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.

http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I totally agree but business is business
cwtcr hokie
Posts: 13399
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by cwtcr hokie »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:Hogg chose to interject himself into the public debate over gun ownership; and he's doing a fantastic job of ensuring that the Democrat-Socialists pick up fewer seats in November.
The NRA is polling at a negative approval rating.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Uncle Fester owned again, the NRA is having a large influx of new members :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Which makes the country safer
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by ip_law-hokie »

cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:Hogg chose to interject himself into the public debate over gun ownership; and he's doing a fantastic job of ensuring that the Democrat-Socialists pick up fewer seats in November.
The NRA is polling at a negative approval rating.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Uncle Fester owned again, the NRA is having a large influx of new members :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Which makes the country safer
OK.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
Techmomof2
Posts: 3032
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2013 2:06 am
Alma Mater: Penn State

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by Techmomof2 »

If Fox doesn't pull the rug out from under her, some advertisers will stay and she'll attract others. There is quite a bit of blowback on the ones who left. The Snowflakes aren't the ones who are buying these products.
User avatar
RiverguyVT
Posts: 30292
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by RiverguyVT »

When a right wing personality is boycotted, it usually works out well for said personality.

Hogg’s 15 minutes are up.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by awesome guy »

RiverguyVT wrote:When a right wing personality is boycotted, it usually works out well for said personality.

Hogg’s 15 minutes are up.
Yep, also strengthens them against future attacks as the squeamish advertisers are flushed out early.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by awesome guy »

Image
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
RiverguyVT
Posts: 30292
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by RiverguyVT »

LOL
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee

Post by ip_law-hokie »

awesome guy wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:When a right wing personality is boycotted, it usually works out well for said personality.

Hogg’s 15 minutes are up.
Yep, also strengthens them against future attacks as the squeamish advertisers are flushed out early.
Yep. Just like Bill OReilly.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
Post Reply