Ingraham’s advertisers flee
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Ingraham’s advertisers flee
Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.
http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
-
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.
http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.
http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
-
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
She wasn’t out of line. It’s the pussyhat wearing crowd that find it offensive. He’s such a little twerp that I put under the category of can dish it out, but he can’t take it.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.
http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
Yep. Camera Hogg comes from the same mold as Nolan. Even the left thinks he's dumb as he can't even get into the UC system. He'll end up at CSUN or San Marcus, if he really wants to live in CA. He'd fit right in, not sure why they won't accept him.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She wasn’t out of line. It’s the pussyhat wearing crowd that find it offensive. He’s such a little twerp that I put under the category of can dish it out, but he can’t take it.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.
http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
He sounds like a real rock. Saw that he was complaining about "not testing well" for his low SAT scores and not getting into any decent schools.awesome guy wrote:Yep. Camera Hogg comes from the same mold as Nolan. Even the left thinks he's dumb as he can't even get into the UC system. He'll end up at CSUN or San Marcus, if he really wants to live in CA. He'd fit right in, not sure why they won't accept him.
- HokieHam
- Posts: 26659
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
- Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
Bull. This kid is running around saying NRA members have blood on their hands. He’s nothing but a useful idiot of Soros and other leftist orgs. If you enter the political arena, you are fair game. Screw this kid and his 15 minutes of fame.nolanvt wrote:Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.
http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."
ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
Ingraham shouldn’t have apologized then.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She wasn’t out of line. It’s the pussyhat wearing crowd that find it offensive. He’s such a little twerp that I put under the category of can dish it out, but he can’t take it.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.
http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
-
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
It’s a classic case of the bullee having to apologize to the bully. I wouldn’t have apologized.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham shouldn’t have apologized then.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She wasn’t out of line. It’s the pussyhat wearing crowd that find it offensive. He’s such a little twerp that I put under the category of can dish it out, but he can’t take it.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.
http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
Given who she is, the attack did cross a line, but the apology should be enough. I think Fox and her advertisers should just let this cool over and proceed from there.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:It’s a classic case of the bullee having to apologize to the bully. I wouldn’t have apologized.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham shouldn’t have apologized then.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She wasn’t out of line. It’s the pussyhat wearing crowd that find it offensive. He’s such a little twerp that I put under the category of can dish it out, but he can’t take it.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.
http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
CorrectMcl3 Hokie wrote:It’s a classic case of the bullee having to apologize to the bully. I wouldn’t have apologized.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham shouldn’t have apologized then.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She wasn’t out of line. It’s the pussyhat wearing crowd that find it offensive. He’s such a little twerp that I put under the category of can dish it out, but he can’t take it.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.
http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
Ok, take her tweet and tell me what specifically is wrong with it.
quote="nolanvt"]Given who she is, the attack did cross a line, but the apology should be enough. I think Fox and her advertisers should just let this cool over and proceed from there.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
quote="nolanvt"]Given who she is, the attack did cross a line, but the apology should be enough. I think Fox and her advertisers should just let this cool over and proceed from there.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:It’s a classic case of the bullee having to apologize to the bully. I wouldn’t have apologized.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham shouldn’t have apologized then.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She wasn’t out of line. It’s the pussyhat wearing crowd that find it offensive. He’s such a little twerp that I put under the category of can dish it out, but he can’t take it.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.
http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
Hogg chose to interject himself into the public debate over gun ownership; and he's doing a fantastic job of ensuring that the Democrat-Socialists pick up fewer seats in November.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
The NRA is polling at a negative approval rating.HokieJoe wrote:Hogg chose to interject himself into the public debate over gun ownership; and he's doing a fantastic job of ensuring that the Democrat-Socialists pick up fewer seats in November.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- HokieHam
- Posts: 26659
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
- Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
By the same pollsters who said Killary would win?ip_law-hokie wrote:The NRA is polling at a negative approval rating.HokieJoe wrote:Hogg chose to interject himself into the public debate over gun ownership; and he's doing a fantastic job of ensuring that the Democrat-Socialists pick up fewer seats in November.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They are also having a huge influx in membership.
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."
ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
She pointed out facts, so facts are wrong... please explain. Yes she went after a piss ant dude that has been running around cussing out anyone over 18 and proclaiming that he has lived such a long life and has such incredible wisdom that he knows way more than any actual adult alive. The guy is an a-hole, just call him hedge hoggnolanvt wrote:Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.
http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
I totally agree but business is businessnolanvt wrote:Ingraham shouldn’t have apologized then.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She wasn’t out of line. It’s the pussyhat wearing crowd that find it offensive. He’s such a little twerp that I put under the category of can dish it out, but he can’t take it.
nolanvt wrote:Ingraham was out of line by her own admission and apology. I’m just curious to see if Fox and her advertisers come together to play this correctly. One F up shouldn’t derail her show if Fox is otherwise happy with her. Wait out social media storms. They’re not necessarily reflective of reality.
Mcl3 Hokie wrote:She said nothing wrong. So it’s ok for this pissant Hogg to call people names, but Laura is the bad person?
nolanvt wrote:Let’s see if they play this correctly. I would simply wait out “social media storm” and encourage advertisers to do the same. Too much stock is put into social media outrage and isn’t necessarily a reflection of the rest of America’s sentiments.
http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/laura-i ... 202740828/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
Uncle Fester owned again, the NRA is having a large influx of new membersip_law-hokie wrote:The NRA is polling at a negative approval rating.HokieJoe wrote:Hogg chose to interject himself into the public debate over gun ownership; and he's doing a fantastic job of ensuring that the Democrat-Socialists pick up fewer seats in November.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Which makes the country safer
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
OK.cwtcr hokie wrote:Uncle Fester owned again, the NRA is having a large influx of new membersip_law-hokie wrote:The NRA is polling at a negative approval rating.HokieJoe wrote:Hogg chose to interject himself into the public debate over gun ownership; and he's doing a fantastic job of ensuring that the Democrat-Socialists pick up fewer seats in November.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Which makes the country safer
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 3032
- Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2013 2:06 am
- Alma Mater: Penn State
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
If Fox doesn't pull the rug out from under her, some advertisers will stay and she'll attract others. There is quite a bit of blowback on the ones who left. The Snowflakes aren't the ones who are buying these products.
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30317
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
When a right wing personality is boycotted, it usually works out well for said personality.
Hogg’s 15 minutes are up.
Hogg’s 15 minutes are up.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
Yep, also strengthens them against future attacks as the squeamish advertisers are flushed out early.RiverguyVT wrote:When a right wing personality is boycotted, it usually works out well for said personality.
Hogg’s 15 minutes are up.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30317
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
LOL
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Ingraham’s advertisers flee
Yep. Just like Bill OReilly.awesome guy wrote:Yep, also strengthens them against future attacks as the squeamish advertisers are flushed out early.RiverguyVT wrote:When a right wing personality is boycotted, it usually works out well for said personality.
Hogg’s 15 minutes are up.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.