Here’s who actually attended the March for Our Lives. (No,

Your Virginia Tech Politics and Religion source
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Post Reply
HokieJoe
Posts: 13122
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:12 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Eclectic

Here’s who actually attended the March for Our Lives. (No,

Post by HokieJoe »

it wasn’t mostly young people.)
By Dana R. Fisher
March 28

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mon ... 4b38b314b5

In the days before and after more than two million Americans participated in the March for Our Lives, the gun-violence conversation has focused on the Marjory Stoneman Douglas survivors and their “student movement.”

The school shooting in Parkland, Fla., and the passion of the teenage survivors have become a catalyst for the current movement. With the help of some well-resourced benefactors, including Oprah Winfrey and George Clooney, the survivors organized an extraordinary rally in D.C. and sister marches around the country in a mere six weeks.

However, the young faces of the advocates have created an assumption that “youth” and “students” are the core of the movement. My research tells a different story about who participated in the March for Our Lives — and it is more complicated and less well-packaged for prime time.

As part of my research on the American Resistance, I have been working with a research team to survey protesters at all the large-scale protest events in Washington since President Trump’s inauguration. By snaking through the crowd and sampling every fifth person at designated increments within the staging area, we are able to gather a field approximation of a random sample. So far, the data set includes surveys collected from 1,745 protest participants.

During the March for Our Lives, my team sampled 256 people who were randomly selected. This gives us the chance to provide evidence about who attended the March for Our Lives and why.

Like other resistance protests, and like previous gun-control marches, the March for Our Lives was mostly women. Whereas the 2017 Women’s March was 85 percent women, the March for Our Lives was 70 percent women. Further, participants were highly educated; 72 percent had a BA or higher.

Contrary to what’s been reported in many media accounts, the D.C. March for Our Lives crowd was not primarily made up of teenagers. Only about 10 percent of the participants were under 18. The average age of the adults in the crowd was just under 49 years old, which is older than participants at the other marches I’ve surveyed but similar to the age of the average participant at the Million Moms March in 2000, which was also about gun control.

Participants were also more likely than those at recent marches to be first-time protesters. About 27 percent of participants at the March for Our Lives had never protested before. This group was less politically engaged in general: Only about a third of them had contacted an elected official in the past year, while about three-quarters of the more seasoned protesters had.

Even more interesting, the new protesters were less motivated by the issue of gun control. In fact, only 12 percent of the people who were new to protesting reported that they were motivated to join the march because of the gun-control issue, compared with 60 percent of the participants with experience protesting.

Instead, new protesters reported being motivated by the issues of peace (56 percent) and Trump (42 percent), who has been a galvanizing force for many protests.

March for Our Lives protesters were also more likely to identify as ideologically moderate. About 16 percent did so, higher than at any other protest event since the inauguration. But unsurprisingly, it was still a very liberal crowd: 79 percent identified as “left-leaning” and 89 percent reported voting for Hillary Clinton.

Thus, in some respects the March for Our Lives mobilized a broader group, including many new protesters and more moderates, than some previous marches. But a remaining question is whether this event will catalyze further action either on gun control or on other issues, as other large-scale demonstrations have.

The March for Our Lives had the allure of a free concert — in fact, the event’s website maintained a list of performers but never listed the speakers. But it is one thing to turn out to watch Lin-Manuel Miranda and Ariana Grande perform, and quite another to vote in the midterm election in November.

Dana R. Fisher is a professor of sociology at the University of Maryland. She is writing “American Resistance,” which will be published by Columbia University Press after the midterm elections.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
USN_Hokie
Posts: 30831
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:58 pm
Party: Draintheswamp

Re: Here’s who actually attended the March for Our Lives. (N

Post by USN_Hokie »

Surprise, more astroturfing
User avatar
USN_Hokie
Posts: 30831
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:58 pm
Party: Draintheswamp

Re: Here’s who actually attended the March for Our Lives. (N

Post by USN_Hokie »

Can't vouch for this website, but they apparently have a FOIA response from the DC Police alleging the permit for this "march" was made months ago.
133743Hokie
Posts: 11220
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am

Re: Here’s who actually attended the March for Our Lives. (N

Post by 133743Hokie »

USN_Hokie wrote:Can't vouch for this website, but they apparently have a FOIA response from the DC Police alleging the permit for this "march" was made months ago.
Meaning pre-Shooting?
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Here’s who actually attended the March for Our Lives. (N

Post by awesome guy »

133743Hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:Can't vouch for this website, but they apparently have a FOIA response from the DC Police alleging the permit for this "march" was made months ago.
Meaning pre-Shooting?
Makes sense as how they could move so fast. Sounds like they exploited the shooting and rebranded to fit the planned protest.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Here’s who actually attended the March for Our Lives. (N

Post by awesome guy »

awesome guy wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:Can't vouch for this website, but they apparently have a FOIA response from the DC Police alleging the permit for this "march" was made months ago.
Meaning pre-Shooting?
Makes sense as how they could move so fast. Sounds like they exploited the shooting and rebranded to fit the planned protest.
This is also how Hillary's coronation turned into a pussy hat convention. It's the same liberal douchebags with a calendar of protests lined up and then shoehorn them into whatever crisis they can take advantage of. Liberal protests are how sports fans experience tailgating. "Hey, weren't you at the 'My Daughter Has a Penis Protest'?". "Yeah, great to see you again Bob!". They're the same jokers with new signs.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
USN_Hokie
Posts: 30831
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:58 pm
Party: Draintheswamp

Re: Here’s who actually attended the March for Our Lives. (N

Post by USN_Hokie »

awesome guy wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:Can't vouch for this website, but they apparently have a FOIA response from the DC Police alleging the permit for this "march" was made months ago.
Meaning pre-Shooting?
Makes sense as how they could move so fast. Sounds like they exploited the shooting and rebranded to fit the planned protest.
That's what I was thinking. They might even have rolling permit applications for every month. If true, it just confirms what we know - there's nothing organic about this.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Here’s who actually attended the March for Our Lives. (N

Post by awesome guy »

USN_Hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
133743Hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:Can't vouch for this website, but they apparently have a FOIA response from the DC Police alleging the permit for this "march" was made months ago.
Meaning pre-Shooting?
Makes sense as how they could move so fast. Sounds like they exploited the shooting and rebranded to fit the planned protest.
That's what I was thinking. They might even have rolling permit applications for every month. If true, it just confirms what we know - there's nothing organic about this.
Of course. There's nothing organic about anything from the left, they're professional activists. They're also propagandist working to deliver an overarching narrative about capitalism and America being evil. So every crisis gets spun into that overarching story. It's like Nolan here when he attempts to claim everything is a conspiracy, regardless of what's said. He's fitting a narrative. The left doesn't care about these issues they raise, they care just to leverage the issue into obtaining power via socialism. Even the presidential candidates get the same treatment. Bush, McCain, Romney, and Trump are the same person according to how the left portrays them. Doesn't matter who the really are, they're going to play the part of capitalist pig in their narrative. They're robots with machine politics.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
Post Reply