United We Stand - uwsboard.com

Holds that 2nd amendment does not cover assault weapons (e.g., AR-15) or large capacity magazines. In accord with the prevailing view.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKCN1HD2CW

Shows that even judges are wrong.

Boston
Boston
Boston
Boston
Boston
Boston
Boston
Boston
Boston
Boston
Boston
Boston
Boston
Boston
Boston
Boston

USN_Hokie wrote:Don't forget Maryland too!!
Don't forget Maryland too!!
Don't forget Maryland too!!
Don't forget Maryland too!!
Don't forget Maryland too!!
Don't forget Maryland too!!
Don't forget Maryland too!!
Don't forget Maryland too!!
Don't forget Maryland too!!
Don't forget Maryland too!!
Don't forget Maryland too!!
Don't forget Maryland too!!
Don't forget Maryland too!!
Don't forget Maryland too!!
Don't forget Maryland too!!
Don't forget Maryland too!!

OK.

ip_law-hokie wrote: My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!

Remember to thank a cop the next time you see one. Just remember they're under no obligation to protect you.

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!

Remember to thank a cop the next time you see one. Just remember they're under no obligation to protect you.

That's obviously the inevitable result on a ban on assault weapons. Slippery Slope!

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:
Remember to thank a cop the next time you see one. Just remember they're under no obligation to protect you.

That's obviously the inevitable result on a ban on assault weapons. Slippery Slope!

No, that would be your rejection / horrible application of the 2nd Amendment as a whole.

WHy uphold the ban on the AR15 but a Ruger Mini 14 is A.O.K. It makes absolutely no sense.

Major Kong wrote:WHy uphold the ban on the AR15 but a Ruger Mini 14 is A.O.K. It makes absolutely no sense.

Sense has absolutely nothing to do with it, Kong.

Major Kong wrote:WHy uphold the ban on the AR15 but a Ruger Mini 14 is A.O.K. It makes absolutely no sense.

Because the ruling is based on nothing but emotion and not logic, reason or the English language.

Ip_sittingdown-hokie wrote:

Major Kong wrote:WHy uphold the ban on the AR15 but a Ruger Mini 14 is A.O.K. It makes absolutely no sense.

But the Mini 14 isn't fully semi-automatic firing 20-thousand boolits per second!

Oh IP!

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!

Remember to thank a cop the next time you see one. Just remember they're under no obligation to protect you.

That's obviously the inevitable result on a ban on assault weapons. Slippery Slope!

Why do you keep doing this Uncle Fester??? You get owned in every one of these gun threads.... Kong got ya this time. Get some knowledge and come back. A ruling from the liberal mecca that is Boston is not representative of the country.

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!

Remember to thank a cop the next time you see one. Just remember they're under no obligation to protect you.

That's obviously the inevitable result on a ban on assault weapons. Slippery Slope!

Why do you keep doing this Uncle Fester??? You get owned in every one of these gun threads.... Kong got ya this time. Get some knowledge and come back. A ruling from the liberal mecca that is Boston is not representative of the country.

I’ve got the 1st and 4th circuits. You’ve got Major Kong.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!

Remember to thank a cop the next time you see one. Just remember they're under no obligation to protect you.

That's obviously the inevitable result on a ban on assault weapons. Slippery Slope!

Why do you keep doing this Uncle Fester??? You get owned in every one of these gun threads.... Kong got ya this time. Get some knowledge and come back. A ruling from the liberal mecca that is Boston is not representative of the country.

I’ve got the 1st and 4th circuits. You’ve got Major Kong.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

got it....whoosh

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!

Remember to thank a cop the next time you see one. Just remember they're under no obligation to protect you.

That's obviously the inevitable result on a ban on assault weapons. Slippery Slope!

Why do you keep doing this Uncle Fester??? You get owned in every one of these gun threads.... Kong got ya this time. Get some knowledge and come back. A ruling from the liberal mecca that is Boston is not representative of the country.

I’ve got the 1st and 4th circuits. You’ve got Major Kong.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

got it....whoosh

Correct. I don’t understand how I got owned by linking an article about a first circuit opinion that Major Kong disagrees with.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!

[/quote]

Remember to thank a cop the next time you see one. Just remember they're under no obligation to protect you.[/quote]

That's obviously the inevitable result on a ban on assault weapons. Slippery Slope![/quote]

Why do you keep doing this Uncle Fester??? You get owned in every one of these gun threads.... Kong got ya this time. Get some knowledge and come back. A ruling from the liberal mecca that is Boston is not representative of the country.[/quote]

I’ve got the 1st and 4th circuits. You’ve got Major Kong.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

got it....whoosh[/quote]

Correct. I don’t understand how I got owned by linking an article about a first circuit opinion that Major Kong disagrees with.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

As kong points out the ruling makes no sense, but again you have no idea what Kong is referencing due to your lack of knowledge and your wanting to be owned yet again in yet another gun thread.

cwtcr hokie wrote:My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!

Remember to thank a cop the next time you see one. Just remember they're under no obligation to protect you.[/quote]

That's obviously the inevitable result on a ban on assault weapons. Slippery Slope![/quote]

Why do you keep doing this Uncle Fester??? You get owned in every one of these gun threads.... Kong got ya this time. Get some knowledge and come back. A ruling from the liberal mecca that is Boston is not representative of the country.[/quote]

I’ve got the 1st and 4th circuits. You’ve got Major Kong.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

got it....whoosh[/quote]

Correct. I don’t understand how I got owned by linking an article about a first circuit opinion that Major Kong disagrees with.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

As kong points out the ruling makes no sense, but again you have no idea what Kong is referencing due to your lack of knowledge and your wanting to be owned yet again in yet another gun thread. [/quote]

Got it. I’d still leave your AR-15 at home if you were to travel to Boston.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!

Remember to thank a cop the next time you see one. Just remember they're under no obligation to protect you.

That's obviously the inevitable result on a ban on assault weapons. Slippery Slope!

Why do you keep doing this Uncle Fester??? You get owned in every one of these gun threads.... Kong got ya this time. Get some knowledge and come back. A ruling from the liberal mecca that is Boston is not representative of the country.

I’ve got the 1st and 4th circuits. You’ve got Major Kong.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We have the 7CA and District Court....and Kong...and the Supreme Court. You're welcome.

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!
My political philosophy relies on the cops I hate for my protection!!

Remember to thank a cop the next time you see one. Just remember they're under no obligation to protect you.

That's obviously the inevitable result on a ban on assault weapons. Slippery Slope!

Why do you keep doing this Uncle Fester??? You get owned in every one of these gun threads.... Kong got ya this time. Get some knowledge and come back. A ruling from the liberal mecca that is Boston is not representative of the country.

I’ve got the 1st and 4th circuits. You’ve got Major Kong.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We have the 7CA and District Court....and Kong...and the Supreme Court. You're welcome.

Understood! You must enjoy your unfettered access to AR-15s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote: Got it. I’d still leave your AR-15 at home if you were to travel to Boston.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You're in way over your head. The AR-15 isn't banned for possession by name, Massachusetts just has a feature test which is applicable to almost all (but not all) AR15's. The Mini 14 passes the feature test, but is identical in function (same capacity, same round, same operation).

The ruling is bad because the law prohibits weapons in common use (see Heller v DC), and the AR15 is the most popular modern sporting rifle in existence.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:
I’ve got the 1st and 4th circuits. You’ve got Major Kong.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We have the 7CA and District Court....and Kong...and the Supreme Court. You're welcome.

Understood! You must enjoy your unfettered access to AR-15s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I do, thanks - in spite of the government's efforts to deny me my rights.

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:
I’ve got the 1st and 4th circuits. You’ve got Major Kong.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We have the 7CA and District Court....and Kong...and the Supreme Court. You're welcome.

Understood! You must enjoy your unfettered access to AR-15s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I do, thanks - in spite of the government's efforts to deny me my rights.

If you’ve got the Supreme Court, you shouldn’t have to worry about it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

USN_Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: Got it. I’d still leave your AR-15 at home if you were to travel to Boston.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You're in way over your head. The AR-15 isn't banned by name, Massachusetts just has a feature test which is applicable to almost all (but not all) AR15's. The Mini 14 passes the feature test, but is identical in function (same capacity, same round, same operation).

The ruling is bad because the law prohibits weapons in common use (see Heller v DC), and the AR15 is the most popular modern sporting rifle in existence.

Got it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Major Kong wrote:WHy uphold the ban on the AR15 but a Ruger Mini 14 is A.O.K. It makes absolutely no sense.

Did the judge have the opportunity to rule on the Ruger Mini 14?

TheH2 wrote:

Major Kong wrote:WHy uphold the ban on the AR15 but a Ruger Mini 14 is A.O.K. It makes absolutely no sense.

Did the judge have the opportunity to rule on the Ruger Mini 14?

It's not affected by the law, there is no standing. That's his point.