United We Stand - uwsboard.com

They need to stop trying to make "fetch" happen.

Seriously though, shouldn't we value Unity instead of diversity? We are all americans living by the same rules and with the privalege of being American. There is American privalege and no other form of privalege in this country.

It's the new affirmative action after that was outed as straight up racism.

You can worry about privilege after you can spell it correctly.

HooFighter wrote:You can worry about privilege after you can spell it correctly.

Sorry, I'm Lisdexic

vtrider wrote:

HooFighter wrote:You can worry about privilege after you can spell it correctly.

Sorry, I'm Lisdexic

pparantyl he haets poelpe wiht dissibbbliliteeez

Diversity is a political agenda tactic. It does not mean diversity of thought. Similarly, Political Correctness means that if you disagree, you cannot speak.

"Diversity" today is only used in an anti-western/anti-male context. In fact, if you replace "diversity" with "less white" in almost every usage, it still works.

HooFighter wrote:You can worry about privilege after you can spell it correctly.

spelling police alert!!!! great contribution

any comment on the actual basis of the post?

vtrider wrote:They need to stop trying to make "fetch" happen.

Seriously though, shouldn't we value Unity instead of diversity? We are all americans living by the same rules and with the privalege of being American. There is American privalege and no other form of privalege in this country.

Unity and diversity are in most cases not mutually exclusive. In those cases where they compete, I prefer diversity of background because it offers more perspectives on a given issue, as well as more competition in the marketplace solutions.

VisorBoy wrote:

vtrider wrote:They need to stop trying to make "fetch" happen.

Seriously though, shouldn't we value Unity instead of diversity? We are all americans living by the same rules and with the privalege of being American. There is American privalege and no other form of privalege in this country.

Unity and diversity are in most cases not mutually exclusive. In those cases where they compete, I prefer diversity of background because it offers more perspectives on a given issue, as well as more competition in the marketplace solutions.

Wut? Diversity is the opposite of unity.

awesome guy wrote:

VisorBoy wrote:

vtrider wrote:They need to stop trying to make "fetch" happen.

Seriously though, shouldn't we value Unity instead of diversity? We are all americans living by the same rules and with the privalege of being American. There is American privalege and no other form of privalege in this country.

Unity and diversity are in most cases not mutually exclusive. In those cases where they compete, I prefer diversity of background because it offers more perspectives on a given issue, as well as more competition in the marketplace solutions.

Wut? Diversity is the opposite of unity.

Yeah, that doesn't make any sense. Diversity always works against unity. Visor seems to be making the tired false argument that lack of multiculturalism = isolationism. That's not true at all.

USN_Hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

VisorBoy wrote:

vtrider wrote:They need to stop trying to make "fetch" happen.

Seriously though, shouldn't we value Unity instead of diversity? We are all americans living by the same rules and with the privalege of being American. There is American privalege and no other form of privalege in this country.

Unity and diversity are in most cases not mutually exclusive. In those cases where they compete, I prefer diversity of background because it offers more perspectives on a given issue, as well as more competition in the marketplace solutions.

Wut? Diversity is the opposite of unity.

Yeah, that doesn't make any sense. Diversity always works against unity. Visor seems to be making the tired false argument that lack of multiculturalism = isolationism. That's not true at all.

I think he's saying we're united in being divided! LOL

As usual though, he's just camoflauging racism with bullshit worldlyness. Diversity is affirmative action, nothing more or less.

USN_Hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

VisorBoy wrote:

vtrider wrote:They need to stop trying to make "fetch" happen.

Seriously though, shouldn't we value Unity instead of diversity? We are all americans living by the same rules and with the privalege of being American. There is American privalege and no other form of privalege in this country.

Unity and diversity are in most cases not mutually exclusive. In those cases where they compete, I prefer diversity of background because it offers more perspectives on a given issue, as well as more competition in the marketplace solutions.

Wut? Diversity is the opposite of unity.

Yeah, that doesn't make any sense. Diversity always works against unity. Visor seems to be making the tired false argument that lack of multiculturalism = isolationism. That's not true at all.

Leaving aside the issue of why you think people living only amongst their own race is a good thing, how do you propose we go about making this happen in this day and age?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

VisorBoy wrote:

vtrider wrote:They need to stop trying to make "fetch" happen.

Seriously though, shouldn't we value Unity instead of diversity? We are all americans living by the same rules and with the privalege of being American. There is American privalege and no other form of privalege in this country.

Unity and diversity are in most cases not mutually exclusive. In those cases where they compete, I prefer diversity of background because it offers more perspectives on a given issue, as well as more competition in the marketplace solutions.

Wut? Diversity is the opposite of unity.

Yeah, that doesn't make any sense. Diversity always works against unity. Visor seems to be making the tired false argument that lack of multiculturalism = isolationism. That's not true at all.

Leaving aside the issue of why you think people living only amongst their own race is a good thing, how do you propose we go about making this happen in this day and age?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What happen? Racial quotas? Why do you think your dimwitted world view is not only correct, but should also be forced apon everyone else?

FYI, under unity, everyone folds into the same culture and expectations with performance measured by competence unlike the racial zoo you're proposing where demographics is the measure of performance.

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

VisorBoy wrote:

vtrider wrote:They need to stop trying to make "fetch" happen.

Seriously though, shouldn't we value Unity instead of diversity? We are all americans living by the same rules and with the privalege of being American. There is American privalege and no other form of privalege in this country.

Unity and diversity are in most cases not mutually exclusive. In those cases where they compete, I prefer diversity of background because it offers more perspectives on a given issue, as well as more competition in the marketplace solutions.

Wut? Diversity is the opposite of unity.

Yeah, that doesn't make any sense. Diversity always works against unity. Visor seems to be making the tired false argument that lack of multiculturalism = isolationism. That's not true at all.

Leaving aside the issue of why you think people living only amongst their own race is a good thing, how do you propose we go about making this happen in this day and age?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What happen? Racial quotas? Why do you think your dimwitted world view is not only correct, but should also be forced apon everyone else?

FYI, under unity, everyone folds into the same culture and expectations with performance measured by competence unlike the racial zoo you're proposing where demographics is the measure of performance.

Racial quotas? What?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

VisorBoy wrote: Unity and diversity are in most cases not mutually exclusive. In those cases where they compete, I prefer diversity of background because it offers more perspectives on a given issue, as well as more competition in the marketplace solutions.

Wut? Diversity is the opposite of unity.

Yeah, that doesn't make any sense. Diversity always works against unity. Visor seems to be making the tired false argument that lack of multiculturalism = isolationism. That's not true at all.

Leaving aside the issue of why you think people living only amongst their own race is a good thing, how do you propose we go about making this happen in this day and age?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What happen? Racial quotas? Why do you think your dimwitted world view is not only correct, but should also be forced apon everyone else?

FYI, under unity, everyone folds into the same culture and expectations with performance measured by competence unlike the racial zoo you're proposing where demographics is the measure of performance.

Racial quotas? What?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's how diversity is measured. It's just another racist liberal policy.

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:Wut? Diversity is the opposite of unity.

Yeah, that doesn't make any sense. Diversity always works against unity. Visor seems to be making the tired false argument that lack of multiculturalism = isolationism. That's not true at all.

Leaving aside the issue of why you think people living only amongst their own race is a good thing, how do you propose we go about making this happen in this day and age?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What happen? Racial quotas? Why do you think your dimwitted world view is not only correct, but should also be forced apon everyone else?

FYI, under unity, everyone folds into the same culture and expectations with performance measured by competence unlike the racial zoo you're proposing where demographics is the measure of performance.

Racial quotas? What?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's how diversity is measured. It's just another racist liberal policy.

How do we become less diverse?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

USN_Hokie wrote: Yeah, that doesn't make any sense. Diversity always works against unity. Visor seems to be making the tired false argument that lack of multiculturalism = isolationism. That's not true at all.

Leaving aside the issue of why you think people living only amongst their own race is a good thing, how do you propose we go about making this happen in this day and age?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What happen? Racial quotas? Why do you think your dimwitted world view is not only correct, but should also be forced apon everyone else?

FYI, under unity, everyone folds into the same culture and expectations with performance measured by competence unlike the racial zoo you're proposing where demographics is the measure of performance.

Racial quotas? What?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's how diversity is measured. It's just another racist liberal policy.

How do we become less diverse?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What?

I take from this thread that diversity is a bad thing. So. How do we become less diverse?

ip_law-hokie wrote:I take from this thread that diversity is a bad thing. So. How do we become less diverse?

OK. Your pivot is tacit admission of making a silly point.

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:I take from this thread that diversity is a bad thing. So. How do we become less diverse?

OK. Your pivot is tacit admission of making a silly point.

If you guys don't have a solution, you seemed destined to stay pissed. That's no way to go through life. Always pissed.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:I take from this thread that diversity is a bad thing. So. How do we become less diverse?

OK. Your pivot is tacit admission of making a silly point.

If you guys don't have a solution, you seemed destined to stay pissed. That's no way to go through life. Always pissed.

You're the one pissed and arrogant enough to think you're to write the rules for everyone else.

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:I take from this thread that diversity is a bad thing. So. How do we become less diverse?

OK. Your pivot is tacit admission of making a silly point.

If you guys don't have a solution, you seemed destined to stay pissed. That's no way to go through life. Always pissed.

You're the one pissed and arrogant enough to think you're to write the rules for everyone else.

Got it.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:I take from this thread that diversity is a bad thing. So. How do we become less diverse?

OK. Your pivot is tacit admission of making a silly point.

If you guys don't have a solution, you seemed destined to stay pissed. That's no way to go through life. Always pissed.

You're the one pissed and arrogant enough to think you're to write the rules for everyone else.

Got it.

Not really. Stay stupid my friend.

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:I take from this thread that diversity is a bad thing. So. How do we become less diverse?

OK. Your pivot is tacit admission of making a silly point.

If you guys don't have a solution, you seemed destined to stay pissed. That's no way to go through life. Always pissed.

You're the one pissed and arrogant enough to think you're to write the rules for everyone else.

Got it.

Not really. Stay stupid my friend.

OK. Stay pissed.