United We Stand - uwsboard.com

Virginia Tech fans discussing politics, religion, and football
It is currently Wed Apr 25, 2018 12:16 pm

Time zone: America/New_York [ DST ]


UWS DWF UWS Lunch UWS Sports UWS Help TSL Football TSL Lounge TSL MBB Acronyms Top 25 Topics


Forum rules


Please be civil.



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 9:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:01 pm
Posts: 9094
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.
that attorney-client privilege is under attack among the low infos. This is a sneakily good narrative he’s pulling off.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
I love UWS!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 10:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:58 pm
Posts: 20626
Party: Draintheswamp
Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?

_________________
“At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child — miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats.”

― P.J. O'Rourke


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:30 pm
Posts: 10465
nolanvt wrote:
that attorney-client privilege is under attack among the low infos. This is a sneakily good narrative he’s pulling off.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Hot take


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:01 pm
Posts: 9094
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?


Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
I love UWS!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 11:17 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 32706
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?


Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ooooooooooooook

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 10:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:25 am
Posts: 9757
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?


Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:58 pm
Posts: 20626
Party: Draintheswamp
cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?


Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber


Dershowitz was accepted to Marshall, but Yale was closer to home. :lol:

_________________
“At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child — miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats.”

― P.J. O'Rourke


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:01 pm
Posts: 9094
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.
cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?


Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber


Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
I love UWS!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:30 pm
Posts: 10465
Hot take


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:58 pm
Posts: 20626
Party: Draintheswamp
nolanvt wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?


Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber


Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Maybe it would just be easier if you provided us a link to the YouTube video you watched.

_________________
“At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child — miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats.”

― P.J. O'Rourke


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:01 pm
Posts: 9094
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.
USN_Hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?


Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber


Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Maybe it would just be easier if you provided us a link to the YouTube video you watched.


?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
I love UWS!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:58 pm
Posts: 20626
Party: Draintheswamp
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?


Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber


Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Maybe it would just be easier if you provided us a link to the YouTube video you watched.


?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Oh no. It's retarded.

_________________
“At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child — miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats.”

― P.J. O'Rourke


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:17 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 32706
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
nolanvt wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?


Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right?

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber


Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Takes get hotter


_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:19 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 32706
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
USN_Hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?


Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right?

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber


Dershowitz was accepted to Marshall, but Yale was closer to home.

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:01 pm
Posts: 9094
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?


Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right?

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber


Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Takes get hotter



Yes or no question: do you believe Attorney-Client privilege exists when the attorney either assists their client in breaking the law or breaks the law themselves while conducting activities on the client’s behalf?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
I love UWS!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:41 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 32706
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
nolanvt wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?


Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right?

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber


Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Takes get hotter



Yes or no question: do you believe Attorney-Client privilege exists when the attorney either assists their client in breaking the law or breaks the law themselves while conducting activities on the client’s behalf?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How are you even making the assessment that a crime took place? You're an idiot in general and here specifically have no idea what you're saying. You're already calling something a crime without bothering to comprehend that it's UnAmerican to raid an office to discover a crime. It works the other way, compelling evidence arrives first and then action takes place. And even then, they should have subpoenaed documents in question instead of raiding the office. Smart people can understand this.

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:01 pm
Posts: 9094
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
[quote="USN_Hokie"]Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?


Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right?

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber


Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Takes get hotter



Yes or no question: do you believe Attorney-Client privilege exists when the attorney either assists their client in breaking the law or breaks the law themselves while conducting activities on the client’s behalf?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How are you even making the assessment that a crime took place? You're an idiot in general and here specifically have no idea what you're saying. You're already calling something a crime without bothering to comprehend that it's UnAmerican to raid an office to discover a crime. It works the other way, compelling evidence arrives first and then action takes place. And even then, they should have subpoenaed documents in question instead of raiding the office. Smart people can understand this.[/quote]

I didn’t say a crime definitively took place. The FBI thinks a crime may have taken place, so that’s why they got a warrant to conduct the raid. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window at that point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
I love UWS!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:58 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 32706
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
nolanvt wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
[quote="nolanvt"][quote="USN_Hokie"]Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?


Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right?

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber


Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Takes get hotter



Yes or no question: do you believe Attorney-Client privilege exists when the attorney either assists their client in breaking the law or breaks the law themselves while conducting activities on the client’s behalf?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How are you even making the assessment that a crime took place? You're an idiot in general and here specifically have no idea what you're saying. You're already calling something a crime without bothering to comprehend that it's UnAmerican to raid an office to discover a crime. It works the other way, compelling evidence arrives first and then action takes place. And even then, they should have subpoenaed documents in question instead of raiding the office. Smart people can understand this.[/quote]

I didn’t say a crime definitively took place. The FBI thinks a crime may have taken place, so that’s why they got a warrant to conduct the raid. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window at that point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

Nope, you're stupid AF. A raid is only for extreme cases, like they think the docs will be destroyed immediately. This is another witch hunt.

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 3:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:25 am
Posts: 9757
Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right?

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber[/quote]

Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]Takes get hotter

[/quote]

Yes or no question: do you believe Attorney-Client privilege exists when the attorney either assists their client in breaking the law or breaks the law themselves while conducting activities on the client’s behalf?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]How are you even making the assessment that a crime took place? You're an idiot in general and here specifically have no idea what you're saying. You're already calling something a crime without bothering to comprehend that it's UnAmerican to raid an office to discover a crime. It works the other way, compelling evidence arrives first and then action takes place. And even then, they should have subpoenaed documents in question instead of raiding the office. Smart people can understand this.[/quote]

I didn’t say a crime definitively took place. The FBI thinks a crime may have taken place, so that’s why they got a warrant to conduct the raid. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window at that point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

what crime?????????? So far we heard thru leaks that is involves "hush" money.....FYI, NDA's are done by many people daily and it is not illegal, it is a contract. IF Trump boinked anyone that is also not illegal so what exact crime was there?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 3:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:29 pm
Posts: 6448
nolanvt wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?


Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right?

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber


Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Takes get hotter



Yes or no question: do you believe Attorney-Client privilege exists when the attorney either assists their client in breaking the law or breaks the law themselves while conducting activities on the client’s behalf?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Of course that is the exception, and most understand that. They gray area is vacuuming up all info and having a Chinese Wall within the FBI review everything and ascertain what is relevant. THAT is a reach, particularly in the current environment and public thinking about the politicization of the DOJ and FBI. Should have only been able to take those documents specific to a proven case where attorney-client privilege doesn't exist.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:01 pm
Posts: 9094
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.
awesome guy wrote:

Nope, you're stupid AF. A raid is only for extreme cases, like they think the docs will be destroyed immediately. This is another witch hunt.


And you believe destroying documents is out of the question?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
I love UWS!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 5:23 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 32706
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
nolanvt wrote:
awesome guy wrote:

Nope, you're stupid AF. A raid is only for extreme cases, like they think the docs will be destroyed immediately. This is another witch hunt.


And you believe destroying documents is out of the question?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Are you really this stupid? A raid is for the case where you know destruction is imminent. Like Hillary unleashing bit bleach on the server. It's not for you not liking Trump.

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 5:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:01 pm
Posts: 9094
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.
cwtcr hokie wrote:

what crime?????????? So far we heard thru leaks that is involves "hush" money.....FYI, NDA's are done by many people daily and it is not illegal, it is a contract. IF Trump boinked anyone that is also not illegal so what exact crime was there?


If the attorney broke the law or assisted in breaking the law, the privilege is revoked. I don’t work for the FBI, so I can’t tell you exactly what they’re investigating Cohen for.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
I love UWS!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 5:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:25 am
Posts: 9757
nolanvt wrote:
awesome guy wrote:

Nope, you're stupid AF. A raid is only for extreme cases, like they think the docs will be destroyed immediately. This is another witch hunt.


And you believe destroying documents is out of the question?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


You are completely missing the point, law enforcement cannot just go grab every document and hope there is a crime in there somewhere. Esp. with a lawyer as the evidence is tainted due to the way it was obtained.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 5:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:01 pm
Posts: 9094
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
awesome guy wrote:

Nope, you're stupid AF. A raid is only for extreme cases, like they think the docs will be destroyed immediately. This is another witch hunt.


And you believe destroying documents is out of the question?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Are you really this stupid? A raid is for the case where you know destruction is imminent. Like Hillary unleashing bit bleach on the server. It's not for you not liking Trump.


The FBI must have believed that was imminent then.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
I love UWS!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Time zone: America/New_York [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: