Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Your Virginia Tech Politics and Religion source
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
nolanvt
Posts: 13116
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:01 pm
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.

Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by nolanvt »

that attorney-client privilege is under attack among the low infos. This is a sneakily good narrative he’s pulling off.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
User avatar
USN_Hokie
Posts: 30831
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:58 pm
Party: Draintheswamp

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by USN_Hokie »

Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
User avatar
RiverguyVT
Posts: 30268
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by RiverguyVT »

nolanvt wrote:that attorney-client privilege is under attack among the low infos. This is a sneakily good narrative he’s pulling off.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hot take
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
nolanvt
Posts: 13116
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:01 pm
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by nolanvt »

USN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by awesome guy »

nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ooooooooooooook
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
cwtcr hokie
Posts: 13399
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by cwtcr hokie »

nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
User avatar
USN_Hokie
Posts: 30831
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:58 pm
Party: Draintheswamp

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by USN_Hokie »

cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Dershowitz was accepted to Marshall, but Yale was closer to home. :lol:
nolanvt
Posts: 13116
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:01 pm
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by nolanvt »

cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
User avatar
RiverguyVT
Posts: 30268
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by RiverguyVT »

Hot take
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
User avatar
USN_Hokie
Posts: 30831
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:58 pm
Party: Draintheswamp

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by USN_Hokie »

nolanvt wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe it would just be easier if you provided us a link to the YouTube video you watched.
nolanvt
Posts: 13116
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:01 pm
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by nolanvt »

USN_Hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe it would just be easier if you provided us a link to the YouTube video you watched.
?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
User avatar
USN_Hokie
Posts: 30831
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:58 pm
Party: Draintheswamp

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by USN_Hokie »

nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe it would just be easier if you provided us a link to the YouTube video you watched.
?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Oh no. It's retarded.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by awesome guy »

nolanvt wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Takes get hotter

[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by awesome guy »

USN_Hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Dershowitz was accepted to Marshall, but Yale was closer to home. [emoji38]
[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
nolanvt
Posts: 13116
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:01 pm
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by nolanvt »

awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Takes get hotter

[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]
Yes or no question: do you believe Attorney-Client privilege exists when the attorney either assists their client in breaking the law or breaks the law themselves while conducting activities on the client’s behalf?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by awesome guy »

nolanvt wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Takes get hotter

[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]
Yes or no question: do you believe Attorney-Client privilege exists when the attorney either assists their client in breaking the law or breaks the law themselves while conducting activities on the client’s behalf?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How are you even making the assessment that a crime took place? You're an idiot in general and here specifically have no idea what you're saying. You're already calling something a crime without bothering to comprehend that it's UnAmerican to raid an office to discover a crime. It works the other way, compelling evidence arrives first and then action takes place. And even then, they should have subpoenaed documents in question instead of raiding the office. Smart people can understand this.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
nolanvt
Posts: 13116
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:01 pm
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by nolanvt »

awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote: Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Takes get hotter

[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]
Yes or no question: do you believe Attorney-Client privilege exists when the attorney either assists their client in breaking the law or breaks the law themselves while conducting activities on the client’s behalf?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How are you even making the assessment that a crime took place? You're an idiot in general and here specifically have no idea what you're saying. You're already calling something a crime without bothering to comprehend that it's UnAmerican to raid an office to discover a crime. It works the other way, compelling evidence arrives first and then action takes place. And even then, they should have subpoenaed documents in question instead of raiding the office. Smart people can understand this.
I didn’t say a crime definitively took place. The FBI thinks a crime may have taken place, so that’s why they got a warrant to conduct the raid. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window at that point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by awesome guy »

nolanvt wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote: so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Takes get hotter

[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]
Yes or no question: do you believe Attorney-Client privilege exists when the attorney either assists their client in breaking the law or breaks the law themselves while conducting activities on the client’s behalf?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How are you even making the assessment that a crime took place? You're an idiot in general and here specifically have no idea what you're saying. You're already calling something a crime without bothering to comprehend that it's UnAmerican to raid an office to discover a crime. It works the other way, compelling evidence arrives first and then action takes place. And even then, they should have subpoenaed documents in question instead of raiding the office. Smart people can understand this.
I didn’t say a crime definitively took place. The FBI thinks a crime may have taken place, so that’s why they got a warrant to conduct the raid. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window at that point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nope, you're stupid AF. A raid is only for extreme cases, like they think the docs will be destroyed immediately. This is another witch hunt.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
cwtcr hokie
Posts: 13399
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by cwtcr hokie »

Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber[/quote]

Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]Takes get hotter

[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][/quote]

Yes or no question: do you believe Attorney-Client privilege exists when the attorney either assists their client in breaking the law or breaks the law themselves while conducting activities on the client’s behalf?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]How are you even making the assessment that a crime took place? You're an idiot in general and here specifically have no idea what you're saying. You're already calling something a crime without bothering to comprehend that it's UnAmerican to raid an office to discover a crime. It works the other way, compelling evidence arrives first and then action takes place. And even then, they should have subpoenaed documents in question instead of raiding the office. Smart people can understand this.[/quote]

I didn’t say a crime definitively took place. The FBI thinks a crime may have taken place, so that’s why they got a warrant to conduct the raid. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window at that point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

what crime?????????? So far we heard thru leaks that is involves "hush" money.....FYI, NDA's are done by many people daily and it is not illegal, it is a contract. IF Trump boinked anyone that is also not illegal so what exact crime was there?
133743Hokie
Posts: 11220
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by 133743Hokie »

nolanvt wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Precisely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]

stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Takes get hotter

[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]
Yes or no question: do you believe Attorney-Client privilege exists when the attorney either assists their client in breaking the law or breaks the law themselves while conducting activities on the client’s behalf?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Of course that is the exception, and most understand that. They gray area is vacuuming up all info and having a Chinese Wall within the FBI review everything and ascertain what is relevant. THAT is a reach, particularly in the current environment and public thinking about the politicization of the DOJ and FBI. Should have only been able to take those documents specific to a proven case where attorney-client privilege doesn't exist.
nolanvt
Posts: 13116
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:01 pm
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by nolanvt »

awesome guy wrote:
Nope, you're stupid AF. A raid is only for extreme cases, like they think the docs will be destroyed immediately. This is another witch hunt.
And you believe destroying documents is out of the question?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by awesome guy »

nolanvt wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
Nope, you're stupid AF. A raid is only for extreme cases, like they think the docs will be destroyed immediately. This is another witch hunt.
And you believe destroying documents is out of the question?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Are you really this stupid? A raid is for the case where you know destruction is imminent. Like Hillary unleashing bit bleach on the server. It's not for you not liking Trump.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
nolanvt
Posts: 13116
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:01 pm
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by nolanvt »

cwtcr hokie wrote:
what crime?????????? So far we heard thru leaks that is involves "hush" money.....FYI, NDA's are done by many people daily and it is not illegal, it is a contract. IF Trump boinked anyone that is also not illegal so what exact crime was there?
If the attorney broke the law or assisted in breaking the law, the privilege is revoked. I don’t work for the FBI, so I can’t tell you exactly what they’re investigating Cohen for.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
cwtcr hokie
Posts: 13399
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by cwtcr hokie »

nolanvt wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
Nope, you're stupid AF. A raid is only for extreme cases, like they think the docs will be destroyed immediately. This is another witch hunt.
And you believe destroying documents is out of the question?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You are completely missing the point, law enforcement cannot just go grab every document and hope there is a crime in there somewhere. Esp. with a lawyer as the evidence is tainted due to the way it was obtained.
nolanvt
Posts: 13116
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:01 pm
Alma Mater: Marshall Univ.

Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking

Post by nolanvt »

awesome guy wrote:
nolanvt wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
Nope, you're stupid AF. A raid is only for extreme cases, like they think the docs will be destroyed immediately. This is another witch hunt.
And you believe destroying documents is out of the question?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Are you really this stupid? A raid is for the case where you know destruction is imminent. Like Hillary unleashing bit bleach on the server. It's not for you not liking Trump.
The FBI must have believed that was imminent then.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
Post Reply