United We Stand - uwsboard.com

He was right.

https://local.theonion.com/golden-retri ... 1825397926


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:He was right.

https://local.theonion.com/golden-retri ... 1825397926


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Have you ever watched the show pitubulls and parolees? How come those people are not mauled daily. All they rescue are pit bulls and so far all of them still have all their limbs and fingers. I never said pit bulls cannot be a danger, anything with teeth can be a danger to another human. But no, they are not killing machines and can be great pets (if treated correctly and not mis-treated) Carry on with your bull shirt

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:He was right.

https://local.theonion.com/golden-retri ... 1825397926


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Have you ever watched the show pitubulls and parolees? How come those people are not mauled daily. All they rescue are pit bulls and so far all of them still have all their limbs and fingers. I never said pit bulls cannot be a danger, anything with teeth can be a danger to another human. But no, they are not killing machines and can be great pets (if treated correctly and not mis-treated) Carry on with your bull shirt

Bull shirt?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:He was right.

https://local.theonion.com/golden-retri ... 1825397926


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Have you ever watched the show pitubulls and parolees? How come those people are not mauled daily. All they rescue are pit bulls and so far all of them still have all their limbs and fingers. I never said pit bulls cannot be a danger, anything with teeth can be a danger to another human. But no, they are not killing machines and can be great pets (if treated correctly and not mis-treated) Carry on with your bull shirt

Bull shirt?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

you got it

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:He was right.

https://local.theonion.com/golden-retri ... 1825397926


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Have you ever watched the show pitubulls and parolees? How come those people are not mauled daily. All they rescue are pit bulls and so far all of them still have all their limbs and fingers. I never said pit bulls cannot be a danger, anything with teeth can be a danger to another human. But no, they are not killing machines and can be great pets (if treated correctly and not mis-treated) Carry on with your bull shirt

Bull shirt?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

you got it

I'll give you a chance to recant your statement, but you have said in the past that if you raise a pit bull and a retriever under the same circumstances, you will get an equally dangerous dog.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:He was right.

https://local.theonion.com/golden-retri ... 1825397926


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Have you ever watched the show pitubulls and parolees? How come those people are not mauled daily. All they rescue are pit bulls and so far all of them still have all their limbs and fingers. I never said pit bulls cannot be a danger, anything with teeth can be a danger to another human. But no, they are not killing machines and can be great pets (if treated correctly and not mis-treated) Carry on with your bull shirt

Bull shirt?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

you got it

I'll give you a chance to recant your statement, but you have said in the past that if you raise a pit bull and a retriever under the same circumstances, you will get an equally dangerous dog.

I'd say you'd get one with an equal temperament towards humans. But the problem is a pitt bull is a lot stronger and so more dangerous when they do bite. They'll eat another dog, regardless of how raised.

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:He was right.

https://local.theonion.com/golden-retri ... 1825397926


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Have you ever watched the show pitubulls and parolees? How come those people are not mauled daily. All they rescue are pit bulls and so far all of them still have all their limbs and fingers. I never said pit bulls cannot be a danger, anything with teeth can be a danger to another human. But no, they are not killing machines and can be great pets (if treated correctly and not mis-treated) Carry on with your bull shirt

Bull shirt?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

you got it

I'll give you a chance to recant your statement, but you have said in the past that if you raise a pit bull and a retriever under the same circumstances, you will get an equally dangerous dog.

I'd say you'd get one with an equal temperament towards humans. But the problem is a pitt bull is a lot stronger and so more dangerous when they do bite. They'll eat another dog, regardless of how raised.

I don’t think there would be an equal temperament toward humans.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

quote="awesome guy"]

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:He was right.

https://local.theonion.com/golden-retri ... 1825397926


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Have you ever watched the show pitubulls and parolees? How come those people are not mauled daily. All they rescue are pit bulls and so far all of them still have all their limbs and fingers. I never said pit bulls cannot be a danger, anything with teeth can be a danger to another human. But no, they are not killing machines and can be great pets (if treated correctly and not mis-treated) Carry on with your bull shirt

Bull shirt?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

you got it

I'll give you a chance to recant your statement, but you have said in the past that if you raise a pit bull and a retriever under the same circumstances, you will get an equally dangerous dog.

I'd say you'd get one with an equal temperament towards humans. But the problem is a pitt bull is a lot stronger and so more dangerous when they do bite. They'll eat another dog, regardless of how raised.[/quote]

I don’t think there would be an equal temperament toward humans.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

you are very wrong in this thread about just about everything but you are clueless, bless your heart

let's talk about guns or your celebration when the two FL cops were both shot dead this week while eating dinner at a cafe from some nut with a beef against cops, oops sorry forgot, pigs

cwtcr hokie wrote:quote="awesome guy"]

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:He was right.

https://local.theonion.com/golden-retri ... 1825397926


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Have you ever watched the show pitubulls and parolees? How come those people are not mauled daily. All they rescue are pit bulls and so far all of them still have all their limbs and fingers. I never said pit bulls cannot be a danger, anything with teeth can be a danger to another human. But no, they are not killing machines and can be great pets (if treated correctly and not mis-treated) Carry on with your bull shirt

Bull shirt?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

you got it

I'll give you a chance to recant your statement, but you have said in the past that if you raise a pit bull and a retriever under the same circumstances, you will get an equally dangerous dog.

I'd say you'd get one with an equal temperament towards humans. But the problem is a pitt bull is a lot stronger and so more dangerous when they do bite. They'll eat another dog, regardless of how raised.

I don’t think there would be an equal temperament toward humans.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

you are very wrong in this thread about just about everything but you are clueless, bless your heart

let's talk about guns or your celebration when the two FL cops were both shot dead this week while eating dinner at a cafe from some nut with a beef against cops, oops sorry forgot, pigs[/quote]

OK. So I haven’t misrepresented your position?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote: Have you ever watched the show pitubulls and parolees? How come those people are not mauled daily. All they rescue are pit bulls and so far all of them still have all their limbs and fingers. I never said pit bulls cannot be a danger, anything with teeth can be a danger to another human. But no, they are not killing machines and can be great pets (if treated correctly and not mis-treated) Carry on with your bull shirt

Bull shirt?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

you got it

I'll give you a chance to recant your statement, but you have said in the past that if you raise a pit bull and a retriever under the same circumstances, you will get an equally dangerous dog.

I'd say you'd get one with an equal temperament towards humans. But the problem is a pitt bull is a lot stronger and so more dangerous when they do bite. They'll eat another dog, regardless of how raised.

I don’t think there would be an equal temperament toward humans.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Right, the pitt bull would be more loyal and protective.

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: Bull shirt?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

you got it

I'll give you a chance to recant your statement, but you have said in the past that if you raise a pit bull and a retriever under the same circumstances, you will get an equally dangerous dog.

I'd say you'd get one with an equal temperament towards humans. But the problem is a pitt bull is a lot stronger and so more dangerous when they do bite. They'll eat another dog, regardless of how raised.

I don’t think there would be an equal temperament toward humans.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Right, the pitt bull would be more loyal and protective.

And more likely to maul an innocent guy walking to his mailbox.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

https://local.theonion.com/golden-retri ... 1825397926


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

Have you ever watched the show pitubulls and parolees? How come those people are not mauled daily. All they rescue are pit bulls and so far all of them still have all their limbs and fingers. I never said pit bulls cannot be a danger, anything with teeth can be a danger to another human. But no, they are not killing machines and can be great pets (if treated correctly and not mis-treated) Carry on with your bull shirt[/quote]

Bull shirt?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

you got it[/quote]

I'll give you a chance to recant your statement, but you have said in the past that if you raise a pit bull and a retriever under the same circumstances, you will get an equally dangerous dog.[/quote]I'd say you'd get one with an equal temperament towards humans. But the problem is a pitt bull is a lot stronger and so more dangerous when they do bite. They'll eat another dog, regardless of how raised.[/quote]

I don’t think there would be an equal temperament toward humans.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]Right, the pitt bull would be more loyal and protective.[/quote]

And more likely to maul an innocent guy walking to his mailbox.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

clueless, bless your heart

cwtcr hokie wrote:https://local.theonion.com/golden-retri ... 1825397926


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Have you ever watched the show pitubulls and parolees? How come those people are not mauled daily. All they rescue are pit bulls and so far all of them still have all their limbs and fingers. I never said pit bulls cannot be a danger, anything with teeth can be a danger to another human. But no, they are not killing machines and can be great pets (if treated correctly and not mis-treated) Carry on with your bull shirt[/quote]

Bull shirt?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

you got it[/quote]

I'll give you a chance to recant your statement, but you have said in the past that if you raise a pit bull and a retriever under the same circumstances, you will get an equally dangerous dog.[/quote]I'd say you'd get one with an equal temperament towards humans. But the problem is a pitt bull is a lot stronger and so more dangerous when they do bite. They'll eat another dog, regardless of how raised.[/quote]

I don’t think there would be an equal temperament toward humans.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]Right, the pitt bull would be more loyal and protective.[/quote]

And more likely to maul an innocent guy walking to his mailbox.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

clueless, bless your heart[/quote]

Why is my characterization of your position bull shirt?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote: you got it

I'll give you a chance to recant your statement, but you have said in the past that if you raise a pit bull and a retriever under the same circumstances, you will get an equally dangerous dog.

I'd say you'd get one with an equal temperament towards humans. But the problem is a pitt bull is a lot stronger and so more dangerous when they do bite. They'll eat another dog, regardless of how raised.

I don’t think there would be an equal temperament toward humans.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Right, the pitt bull would be more loyal and protective.

And more likely to maul an innocent guy walking to his mailbox.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nah, but it's certainly a worse bite when it happens.

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: I'll give you a chance to recant your statement, but you have said in the past that if you raise a pit bull and a retriever under the same circumstances, you will get an equally dangerous dog.

I'd say you'd get one with an equal temperament towards humans. But the problem is a pitt bull is a lot stronger and so more dangerous when they do bite. They'll eat another dog, regardless of how raised.

I don’t think there would be an equal temperament toward humans.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Right, the pitt bull would be more loyal and protective.

And more likely to maul an innocent guy walking to his mailbox.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nah, but it's certainly a worse bite when it happens.

Wouldn’t the fact that they would be more loyal and protective make them more likely to strike out at someone else?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:I'd say you'd get one with an equal temperament towards humans. But the problem is a pitt bull is a lot stronger and so more dangerous when they do bite. They'll eat another dog, regardless of how raised.

I don’t think there would be an equal temperament toward humans.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Right, the pitt bull would be more loyal and protective.

And more likely to maul an innocent guy walking to his mailbox.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nah, but it's certainly a worse bite when it happens.

Wouldn’t the fact that they would be more loyal and protective make them more likely to strike out at someone else?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Only if threatened.

Lol. 1 internet point awarded to IP.

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:He was right.

https://local.theonion.com/golden-retri ... 1825397926


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Have you ever watched the show pitubulls and parolees? How come those people are not mauled daily. All they rescue are pit bulls and so far all of them still have all their limbs and fingers. I never said pit bulls cannot be a danger, anything with teeth can be a danger to another human. But no, they are not killing machines and can be great pets (if treated correctly and not mis-treated) Carry on with your bull shirt

Maria Torres would tell you that pit bulls are more aggressive by nature, and that you need to train them differently and handle them differently than other dogs. Labradors are by nature, attracted to water. Pit bulls, by nature, are aggressive in general, and highly aggressive to other dogs. Training and handling can mitigate some of their genetic instincts, but they’re still there.

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

awesome guy wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote: I don’t think there would be an equal temperament toward humans.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Right, the pitt bull would be more loyal and protective.

And more likely to maul an innocent guy walking to his mailbox.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nah, but it's certainly a worse bite when it happens.

Wouldn’t the fact that they would be more loyal and protective make them more likely to strike out at someone else?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Only if threatened.

That’s a big if.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk