Snapchat celebrates LGBT pride month with "love has no age"

[UpstateSCHokie]

filter. All part of their normalization effort.

=============================================

[awesome guy]

They're a bunch of whackos and pedophiles so it makes sense. Nolan approved of course.

[RiverguyVT]

yowza

[HokieHam]

They're a bunch of whackos and pedophiles so it makes sense. Nolan approved of course.

Yup. It’s the slippery slope he and his ilk have greased.

[awesome guy]

They're a bunch of whackos and pedophiles so it makes sense. Nolan approved of course.

Yup. It’s the slippery slope he and his ilk have greased.

This over the cliff. Moving the goalposts on divorce was the slippery slope. We're over the edge now.

[HokieJoe]

Freakshow

[USN_Hokie]

They're a bunch of whackos and pedophiles so it makes sense. Nolan approved of course.

Yup. It’s the slippery slope he and his ilk have greased.

This over the cliff. Moving the goalposts on divorce was the slippery slope. We're over the edge now.

Biden just told an audience that his first priority if he becomes president is to add LGWTFBBQ+#$£€¢©® to the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 40891.html

[HokieFanDC]

filter. All part of their normalization effort.

=============================================

Snapchat doesn’t care. They seem to lack morals wrt to their app and teen sexting.

[USN_Hokie]

Snapchat doesn’t care. They seem to lack morals wrt to their app and teen sexting.

I think the world would be a better place if we just dropped a daisey cutter on the snapchat headquarters in the middle of the night.

[CFB Apologist]

Snapchat doesn’t care. They seem to lack morals wrt to their app and teen sexting.

I think the world would be a better place if we just dropped a daisey cutter on the snapchat headquarters in the middle of the night.

It is the worst UI I have ever seen. It's like they hired developers to TRY to be non-intuitive on how to use an app. It's garbage to try to use.

[Bay_area_Hokie]

Snapchat doesn’t care. They seem to lack morals wrt to their app and teen sexting.

I think the world would be a better place if we just dropped a daisey cutter on the snapchat headquarters in the middle of the night.

It is the worst UI I have ever seen. It's like they hired developers to TRY to be non-intuitive on how to use an app. It's garbage to try to use.

I find it challenging as well, and I am supposedly someone who has pretty good UX chops. One of my kids uses a lot, but i uninstalled it from my phone.

[nolanvt]

They're a bunch of whackos and pedophiles so it makes sense. Nolan approved of course.

There’s a hot take.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[awesome guy]

They're a bunch of whackos and pedophiles so it makes sense. Nolan approved of course.

There’s a hot take.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nope

[HokieHam]

Funny how we went from “stay out of our bedroom” to celebrating who people have sex with.

[RiverguyVT]

Funny how we went from “stay out of our bedroom” to celebrating who people have sex with.

Ain't that post and meme the truth!!!

I notice, too, that television shows that have nothing to do with sex as a primary plot line, always work in a bevvy of lesbian and gay male sub plot lines these days. A family? Someone has to be gay. My wife's hospital nighttime soap operas? Yeah, the nurse is lesbian, the doctor is gay, the fireman is gay, the lead surgeon is gay... Court/cop dramas- what would a crime solution be without the gay lab guy or lesbian coroner? It isn't a natural part of the storyline... it is Hollywood treating us like that cat, above. Look. A little of it may be okay. But jiminy! EVERY EFFING SHOW EVERY EFFING CHARACTER. Rather than the statistical (what? 5%?) percentage representation, we're indoctrinated that every other person is LGBPOIUY

/rant

(get off my lawn!)

[nolanvt]

You guys are obsessed with television characters now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[RiverguyVT]

You guys are obsessed with television characters now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Obsessed? That's kindof a strong characterization. Where is my "obsession"? Have I posted about TV drama characters before? That'd be an obsession, N. I'm making a cultural observation about the entertainment industry. Sure. The biz has always had more than the normal statistically expected # of gays, going back to ancient Greece and Shakespeare's days, likely. But back then, were all of Shakespeare's characters LGBYTREW? Of course not. At least, not from what I recall in my HS lit class.

Instead of saying I'm obsessed with TV characters, maybe you should say you're obsessed with gay stuff. Because, you have indeed established an identity here as advocating without bounds for the slippery slopes. THAT's an obsession, N.

[nolanvt]

You guys are obsessed with television characters now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Obsessed? That's kindof a strong characterization. Where is my "obsession"? Have I posted about TV drama characters before? That'd be an obsession, N. I'm making a cultural observation about the entertainment industry. Sure. The biz has always had more than the normal statistically expected # of gays, going back to ancient Greece and Shakespeare's days, likely. But back then, were all of Shakespeare's characters LGBYTREW? Of course not. At least, not from what I recall in my HS lit class.

Instead of saying I'm obsessed with TV characters, maybe you should say you're obsessed with gay stuff. Because, you have indeed established an identity here as advocating without bounds for the slippery slopes. THAT's an obsession, N.

I dunno. I haven’t taken inventory of the number of gay characters on TV. I just watch what I think are good shows, so you’re free to think that’s obsessing, but it’s not.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[HokieHam]

You guys are obsessed with television characters now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Obsessed? That's kindof a strong characterization. Where is my "obsession"? Have I posted about TV drama characters before? That'd be an obsession, N. I'm making a cultural observation about the entertainment industry. Sure. The biz has always had more than the normal statistically expected # of gays, going back to ancient Greece and Shakespeare's days, likely. But back then, were all of Shakespeare's characters LGBYTREW? Of course not. At least, not from what I recall in my HS lit class.

Instead of saying I'm obsessed with TV characters, maybe you should say you're obsessed with gay stuff. Because, you have indeed established an identity here as advocating without bounds for the slippery slopes. THAT's an obsession, N.

They’re trying to normalize that which is not. Their end goal is everything is A-okay. He doesn’t believe it’s headed to the normalization of pedo’s, but it is. It will be the lgbtpdqxyz123. Hell, look at all the children doing the whole cross dressing/tranny thing.

And yes. He’s earned the reputation.

[nolanvt]

You guys are obsessed with television characters now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Obsessed? That's kindof a strong characterization. Where is my "obsession"? Have I posted about TV drama characters before? That'd be an obsession, N. I'm making a cultural observation about the entertainment industry. Sure. The biz has always had more than the normal statistically expected # of gays, going back to ancient Greece and Shakespeare's days, likely. But back then, were all of Shakespeare's characters LGBYTREW? Of course not. At least, not from what I recall in my HS lit class.

Instead of saying I'm obsessed with TV characters, maybe you should say you're obsessed with gay stuff. Because, you have indeed established an identity here as advocating without bounds for the slippery slopes. THAT's an obsession, N.

They’re trying to normalize that which is not. Their end goal is everything is A-okay. He doesn’t believe it’s headed to the normalization of pedo’s, but it is. It will be the lgbtpdqxyz123. Hell, look at all the children doing the whole cross dressing/tranny thing.

And yes. He’s earned the reputation.

The scary slippery slope! LOL!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[RiverguyVT]

You guys are obsessed with television characters now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Obsessed? That's kindof a strong characterization. Where is my "obsession"? Have I posted about TV drama characters before? That'd be an obsession, N. I'm making a cultural observation about the entertainment industry. Sure. The biz has always had more than the normal statistically expected # of gays, going back to ancient Greece and Shakespeare's days, likely. But back then, were all of Shakespeare's characters LGBYTREW? Of course not. At least, not from what I recall in my HS lit class.

Instead of saying I'm obsessed with TV characters, maybe you should say you're obsessed with gay stuff. Because, you have indeed established an identity here as advocating without bounds for the slippery slopes. THAT's an obsession, N.

I dunno. I haven’t taken inventory of the number of gay characters on TV. I just watch what I think are good shows, so you’re free to think that’s obsessing, but it’s not.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's either a terrible attempt at avoidance, or one of the bigger "whooooosh"es I've ever seen from you.

[nolanvt]

You guys are obsessed with television characters now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Obsessed? That's kindof a strong characterization. Where is my "obsession"? Have I posted about TV drama characters before? That'd be an obsession, N. I'm making a cultural observation about the entertainment industry. Sure. The biz has always had more than the normal statistically expected # of gays, going back to ancient Greece and Shakespeare's days, likely. But back then, were all of Shakespeare's characters LGBYTREW? Of course not. At least, not from what I recall in my HS lit class.

Instead of saying I'm obsessed with TV characters, maybe you should say you're obsessed with gay stuff. Because, you have indeed established an identity here as advocating without bounds for the slippery slopes. THAT's an obsession, N.

I dunno. I haven’t taken inventory of the number of gay characters on TV. I just watch what I think are good shows, so you’re free to think that’s obsessing, but it’s not.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's either a terrible attempt at avoidance, or one of the bigger "whooooosh"es I've ever seen from you.

You’re a bit all over the place. What is your question, and I will happily answer and go into detail with my response.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[RiverguyVT]

You guys are obsessed with television characters now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Obsessed? That's kindof a strong characterization. Where is my "obsession"? Have I posted about TV drama characters before? That'd be an obsession, N. I'm making a cultural observation about the entertainment industry. Sure. The biz has always had more than the normal statistically expected # of gays, going back to ancient Greece and Shakespeare's days, likely. But back then, were all of Shakespeare's characters LGBYTREW? Of course not. At least, not from what I recall in my HS lit class.

Instead of saying I'm obsessed with TV characters, maybe you should say you're obsessed with gay stuff. Because, you have indeed established an identity here as advocating without bounds for the slippery slopes. THAT's an obsession, N.

I dunno. I haven’t taken inventory of the number of gay characters on TV. I just watch what I think are good shows, so you’re free to think that’s obsessing, but it’s not.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's either a terrible attempt at avoidance, or one of the bigger "whooooosh"es I've ever seen from you.

You’re a bit all over the place. What is your question, and I will happily answer and go into detail with my response.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm writing sloooowly so you can understand.
Go back to your post, re-read it, and then to my post which starts with "Obsessed?...."
You failed to address that post even remotely.
Talk about "all over the place"... You're the one jumping around. Bless your heart.

Tell me... are you Diggety, redux?

[nolanvt]

You guys are obsessed with television characters now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Obsessed? That's kindof a strong characterization. Where is my "obsession"? Have I posted about TV drama characters before? That'd be an obsession, N. I'm making a cultural observation about the entertainment industry. Sure. The biz has always had more than the normal statistically expected # of gays, going back to ancient Greece and Shakespeare's days, likely. But back then, were all of Shakespeare's characters LGBYTREW? Of course not. At least, not from what I recall in my HS lit class.

Instead of saying I'm obsessed with TV characters, maybe you should say you're obsessed with gay stuff. Because, you have indeed established an identity here as advocating without bounds for the slippery slopes. THAT's an obsession, N.

I dunno. I haven’t taken inventory of the number of gay characters on TV. I just watch what I think are good shows, so you’re free to think that’s obsessing, but it’s not.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's either a terrible attempt at avoidance, or one of the bigger "whooooosh"es I've ever seen from you.

You’re a bit all over the place. What is your question, and I will happily answer and go into detail with my response.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm writing sloooowly so you can understand.
Go back to your post, re-read it, and then to my post which starts with "Obsessed?...."
You failed to address that post even remotely.
Talk about "all over the place"... You're the one jumping around. Bless your heart.

Tell me... are you Diggety, redux?

Got it. I’ll just take your initial post as a rambling rant and call it a day.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[RiverguyVT]

Got it. I’ll just take your initial post asa rambling rant and as something I'm unequipped to understand and answer, so I'll call it a day after trying unsuccessfully to misdirect and evade.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fixed that for you.