This should bother you more than it will

HokieHam · Post by **HokieHam** » Wed Sep 09, 2020 11:30 pm

They are even more retarded than this.

Correct.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie · Post by **ip_law-hokie** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 12:42 am

USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
HooFighter wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:You bootlickers really are unbelievable. This country deserves what it gets.
Sadly this is what they want. Pathetic.
Yeah, *that* is where we went banana republic. Meanwhile...

Any thoughts on the DoJ replacing Cohen as Trump’s fixer?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You mean just like they did for Obama? Are you and hoof really this retarded?

LOL. I missed it when they defended Obama for a sexual assault claim that arose prior to his time in office. That’s great, Cap’n. All UWS doxers agree.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

RiverguyVT · Post by **RiverguyVT** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:00 am

ip_law-hokie wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:When your kids ask you when the US became a banana republic, you should remember moments like this.

https://apple.news/ABNMx7o9pQ9GNMuFPkVOA2w

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That woman is bat-crap crazy.
You bootlickers really are unbelievable. This country deserves what it gets.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Don't explain your non-understanding of defense process (and you're a lawyer!?) on my so-called "boot licking". Laughable on several fronts. First, that you keep calling me a "boot licker" for Trump. Second that you have no idea what you're talking about (hint: CNN led you astray). Third, that you think this a credible claim from a credible (cough-cough) "victim".

Dude. The closer it comes to November, the more "out-of-whack" you seem to be getting.

None of that is a "me" thing.

ip_law-hokie · Post by **ip_law-hokie** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:19 am

RiverguyVT wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:When your kids ask you when the US became a banana republic, you should remember moments like this.

https://apple.news/ABNMx7o9pQ9GNMuFPkVOA2w

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That woman is bat-crap crazy.
You bootlickers really are unbelievable. This country deserves what it gets.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Don't explain your non-understanding of defense process (and you're a lawyer!?) on my so-called "boot licking". Laughable on several fronts. First, that you keep calling me a "boot licker" for Trump. Second that you have no idea what you're talking about (hint: CNN led you astray). Third, that you think this a credible claim from a credible (cough-cough) "victim".

Dude. The closer it comes to November, the more "out-of-whack" you seem to be getting.

None of that is a "me" thing.

Got it.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

USN_Hokie · Post by **USN_Hokie** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:50 am

ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
HooFighter wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:You bootlickers really are unbelievable. This country deserves what it gets.
Sadly this is what they want. Pathetic.
Yeah, *that* is where we went banana republic. Meanwhile...

Any thoughts on the DoJ replacing Cohen as Trump’s fixer?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You mean just like they did for Obama? Are you and hoof really this retarded?
LOL. I missed it when they defended Obama for a sexual assault claim that arose prior to his time in office. That’s great, Cap’n. All UWS doxers agree.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Maybe you should find a lawyer to explain to you that this is a civil defamation case.

ip_law-hokie · Post by **ip_law-hokie** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:46 am

USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
HooFighter wrote: Sadly this is what they want. Pathetic.
Yeah, *that* is where we went banana republic. Meanwhile...

Any thoughts on the DoJ replacing Cohen as Trump’s fixer?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You mean just like they did for Obama? Are you and hoof really this retarded?
LOL. I missed it when they defended Obama for a sexual assault claim that arose prior to his time in office. That’s great, Cap’n. All UWS doxers agree.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe you should find a lawyer to explain to you that this is a civil defamation case.

OK Cap’n. What’s the basis of the defamation and how does that change things? I’m actually curious of the mental gymnastics required on your end to justify, among other things, the use of taxpayer money to defend this claim.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

HokieHam · Post by **HokieHam** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:59 am

RiverguyVT wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:When your kids ask you when the US became a banana republic, you should remember moments like this.

https://apple.news/ABNMx7o9pQ9GNMuFPkVOA2w

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That woman is bat-crap crazy.
You bootlickers really are unbelievable. This country deserves what it gets.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Don't explain your non-understanding of defense process (and you're a lawyer!?) on my so-called "boot licking". Laughable on several fronts. First, that you keep calling me a "boot licker" for Trump. Second that you have no idea what you're talking about (hint: CNN led you astray). Third, that you think this a credible claim from a credible (cough-cough) "victim".

Dude. The closer it comes to November, the more "out-of-whack" you seem to be getting.

None of that is a "me" thing.

Correct. He thinks he’s consistent........

USN_Hokie · Post by **USN_Hokie** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 3:11 am

ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:LOL. I missed it when they defended Obama for a sexual assault claim that arose prior to his time in office. That’s great, Cap’n. All UWS doxers agree.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe you should find a lawyer to explain to you that this is a civil defamation case.
OK Cap’n. What’s the basis of the defamation and how does that change things? I’m actually curious of the mental gymnastics required on your end to justify, among other things, the use of taxpayer money to defend this claim.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Maybe you should read something other than sh*t CNN articles which don't cover all the facts? Here's a tip - listen to Barr's explanation.

ip_law-hokie · Post by **ip_law-hokie** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 4:03 am

USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:LOL. I missed it when they defended Obama for a sexual assault claim that arose prior to his time in office. That’s great, Cap’n. All UWS doxers agree.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe you should find a lawyer to explain to you that this is a civil defamation case.
OK Cap’n. What’s the basis of the defamation and how does that change things? I’m actually curious of the mental gymnastics required on your end to justify, among other things, the use of taxpayer money to defend this claim.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe you should read something other than sh*t CNN articles which don't cover all the facts? Here's a tip - listen to Barr's explanation.

Didn’t want to explain it yourself?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

RiverguyVT · Post by **RiverguyVT** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:40 am

ip_law-hokie wrote:Didn’t want to explain it yourself?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

LOL.

This, from the king of:

"Got it"
"OK"
"Danville"
etc

You were wrong, uninformed, and unthinkingly emotional.
Just admit your error and move on. The board scrolls, so this embarrassment of yours will eventually be lost to time.

It's Okay.
You've Got This.

ip_law-hokie · Post by **ip_law-hokie** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 12:17 pm

RiverguyVT wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:Didn’t want to explain it yourself?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LOL.

This, from the king of:

"Got it"
"OK"
"Danville"
etc

You were wrong, uninformed, and unthinkingly emotional.
Just admit your error and move on. The board scrolls, so this embarrassment of yours will eventually be lost to time.

It's Okay.
You've Got This.

LOL. What error should I admit Riverguy?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

USN_Hokie · Post by **USN_Hokie** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:16 pm

ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:LOL. I missed it when they defended Obama for a sexual assault claim that arose prior to his time in office. That’s great, Cap’n. All UWS doxers agree.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe you should find a lawyer to explain to you that this is a civil defamation case.
OK Cap’n. What’s the basis of the defamation and how does that change things? I’m actually curious of the mental gymnastics required on your end to justify, among other things, the use of taxpayer money to defend this claim.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe you should read something other than sh*t CNN articles which don't cover all the facts? Here's a tip - listen to Barr's explanation.
Didn’t want to explain it yourself?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If you have a disability which prevents you from looking up Barr's response I'd be glad to help. Just let me know.

ip_law-hokie · Post by **ip_law-hokie** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:31 pm

USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:LOL. I missed it when they defended Obama for a sexual assault claim that arose prior to his time in office. That’s great, Cap’n. All UWS doxers agree.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe you should find a lawyer to explain to you that this is a civil defamation case.
OK Cap’n. What’s the basis of the defamation and how does that change things? I’m actually curious of the mental gymnastics required on your end to justify, among other things, the use of taxpayer money to defend this claim.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe you should read something other than sh*t CNN articles which don't cover all the facts? Here's a tip - listen to Barr's explanation.
Didn’t want to explain it yourself?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you have a disability which prevents you from looking up Barr's response I'd be glad to help. Just let me know.

I’d prefer to hear your thoughts. Or are you, by rule, 100% lockstep with the Trump admin?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

USN_Hokie · Post by **USN_Hokie** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:46 pm

ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:[quote="ip_law-hokieL. I missed it when they defended Obama for a sexual assault claim that arose prior to his time in office. That’s great, Cap’n. All UWS doxers agree.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe you should find a lawyer to explain to you that this is a civil defamation case.
OK Cap’n. What’s the basis of the defamation and how does that change things? I’m actually curious of the mental gymnastics required on your end to justify, among other things, the use of taxpayer money to defend this claim.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe you should read something other than sh*t CNN articles which don't cover all the facts? Here's a tip - listen to Barr's explanation.
Didn’t want to explain it yourself?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you have a disability which prevents you from looking up Barr's response I'd be glad to help. Just let me know.

I’d prefer to hear your thoughts. Or are you, by rule, 100% lockstep with the Trump admin?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

Even though I do know the difference between a criminal rape case and civil libel case, I don't pretend to be a legal expert like Barr and thus, my interpretation of his comments wouldn't add anything to the conversation most likely.

ip_law-hokie · Post by **ip_law-hokie** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:56 pm

USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote: Maybe you should find a lawyer to explain to you that this is a civil defamation case.
OK Cap’n. What’s the basis of the defamation and how does that change things? I’m actually curious of the mental gymnastics required on your end to justify, among other things, the use of taxpayer money to defend this claim.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe you should read something other than sh*t CNN articles which don't cover all the facts? Here's a tip - listen to Barr's explanation.
Didn’t want to explain it yourself?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you have a disability which prevents you from looking up Barr's response I'd be glad to help. Just let me know.
I’d prefer to hear your thoughts. Or are you, by rule, 100% lockstep with the Trump admin?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Even though I do know the difference between a criminal rape case and civil libel case, I don't pretend to be a legal expert like Barr and thus, my interpretation of his comments wouldn't add anything to the conversation most likely.[/quote]Got it Cap’n. Have you asked your aviator friend? Or maybe your molecular microbiologist friend with the insight on the confidential vaccine results? I’m bet you have a damn near authority somewhere in your panel.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

HokieHam · Post by **HokieHam** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:19 pm

ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote: OK Cap’n. What’s the basis of the defamation and how does that change things? I’m actually curious of the mental gymnastics required on your end to justify, among other things, the use of taxpayer money to defend this claim.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe you should read something other than sh*t CNN articles which don't cover all the facts? Here's a tip - listen to Barr's explanation.
Didn’t want to explain it yourself?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you have a disability which prevents you from looking up Barr's response I'd be glad to help. Just let me know.
I’d prefer to hear your thoughts. Or are you, by rule, 100% lockstep with the Trump admin?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Even though I do know the difference between a criminal rape case and civil libel case, I don't pretend to be a legal expert like Barr and thus, my interpretation of his comments wouldn't add anything to the conversation most likely.

Got it Cap’n. Have you asked your aviator friend? Or maybe your molecular microbiologist friend with the insight on the confidential vaccine results? I’m bet you have a damn near authority somewhere in your panel.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]“betting”

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip_law-hokie · Post by **ip_law-hokie** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:27 pm

HokieHam wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote: Maybe you should read something other than sh*t CNN articles which don't cover all the facts? Here's a tip - listen to Barr's explanation.
Didn’t want to explain it yourself?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you have a disability which prevents you from looking up Barr's response I'd be glad to help. Just let me know.
I’d prefer to hear your thoughts. Or are you, by rule, 100% lockstep with the Trump admin?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Even though I do know the difference between a criminal rape case and civil libel case, I don't pretend to be a legal expert like Barr and thus, my interpretation of his comments wouldn't add anything to the conversation most likely.
Got it Cap’n. Have you asked your aviator friend? Or maybe your molecular microbiologist friend with the insight on the confidential vaccine results? I’m bet you have a damn near authority somewhere in your panel.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

“betting”

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]Thanks Ham. [emoji120]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

HokieHam · Post by **HokieHam** » Fri Sep 30, 2022 12:08 am

This thread was…..adorable……I’m sooo many ways.

Trump Wins Ruling in Rape Accuser Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit

https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-win ... =ZeroHedge

RiverguyVT · Post by **RiverguyVT** » Fri Sep 30, 2022 10:59 am

HokieHam wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 12:08 am This thread was…..adorable……I’m sooo many ways.

Trump Wins Ruling in Rape Accuser Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit
https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-win ... =ZeroHedge

HooFighter · Post by **HooFighter** » Tue May 09, 2023 7:49 pm

HokieHam wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 12:08 am This thread was…..adorable……I’m sooo many ways.

Trump Wins Ruling in Rape Accuser Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit
https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-win ... =ZeroHedge

You can say that again.

HooFighter · Post by **HooFighter** » Tue May 09, 2023 7:50 pm

HooFighter wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 7:49 pm
HokieHam wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 12:08 am This thread was…..adorable……I’m sooo many ways.

Trump Wins Ruling in Rape Accuser Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit
https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-win ... =ZeroHedge
You can say that again.

OK technically not a rapist, just a sexual abuser. I'm a big enough man to admit when I am wrong lol.

RiverguyVT · Post by **RiverguyVT** » Tue May 09, 2023 8:44 pm

our asymmetrical system of justice will be our undoing.

HvilleHokie · Post by **HvilleHokie** » Tue May 09, 2023 10:17 pm

RiverguyVT wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 8:44 pm our asymmetrical system of justice will be our undoing.

To quote riverguy… actions have consequences

RiverguyVT · Post by **RiverguyVT** » Wed May 10, 2023 12:00 am

HvilleHokie wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 10:17 pm
RiverguyVT wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 8:44 pm our asymmetrical system of justice will be our undoing.
To quote riverguy… actions have consequences

indeed they do

HokieFanDC · Post by **HokieFanDC** » Wed May 10, 2023 12:54 am

RiverguyVT wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 8:44 pm our asymmetrical system of justice will be our undoing.

A sign of our undoing is when seemingly sane people believe a POTUS election was stolen and that the American justice system of common law and a jury of peers is unfair.

Other options could be that the defendant is guilty, or that the defendant has terrible lawyers.

United We Stand - uwsboard.com

This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will

Re: This should bother you more than it will