8 Reasons Why E. Jean Carroll Won Her Sexual Abuse and Defamation Lawsuit Against Trump
It is not hard to see why the jury concluded that the incident she described probably happened.
Fifth, Trump did himself no favors during a deposition in which Carroll's lead lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, asked him about those remarks. "Well, historically that's true with stars," he said. "It's true with stars that they can grab women by the pussy?" Kaplan asked. "If you look over the last million years," Trump replied, "I guess that's been largely true, not always, but largely true—unfortunately or fortunately." When Kaplan asked if Trump considered himself "a star," he said, "I think you can say that, yeah."
Sixth, Trump insisted that he did not know Carroll, despite photographic evidence that they had met, and his denial of her charges hinged largely on his claim that "she's not my type"—as if he could imagine behaving as Carroll claimed he had with a woman he found more attractive. Kaplan noted that when she showed Trump a picture of Carroll greeting him at a social event in the 1980s, he mistook her for Marla Maples, his second wife. "The truth is that E. Jean Carroll, a former cheerleader and Miss Indiana, was exactly Donald Trump's type," Kaplan told the jury.
7th Amendment In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
I guess our Constitution is now 'pick your own adventure' if you're MAGA (looking at Rubio and Tuberville statements)?
By this logic, ignore the Seventh Amendment and hug the Second. If this is true I guess some states should be able to do the reverse.
BTW, only 2 jurors on the jury were from NYC counties.
And?
It is as if you raise a point no one else does (“pick your own..”), and then criticize that point which has not been advanced (“by this logic…”).
A little learning is a dangerous thing;
Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
And drinking largely sobers us again. A. Pope
8 Reasons Why E. Jean Carroll Won Her Sexual Abuse and Defamation Lawsuit Against Trump
It is not hard to see why the jury concluded that the incident she described probably happened.
Fifth, Trump did himself no favors during a deposition in which Carroll's lead lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, asked him about those remarks. "Well, historically that's true with stars," he said. "It's true with stars that they can grab women by the pussy?" Kaplan asked. "If you look over the last million years," Trump replied, "I guess that's been largely true, not always, but largely true—unfortunately or fortunately." When Kaplan asked if Trump considered himself "a star," he said, "I think you can say that, yeah."
Sixth, Trump insisted that he did not know Carroll, despite photographic evidence that they had met, and his denial of her charges hinged largely on his claim that "she's not my type"—as if he could imagine behaving as Carroll claimed he had with a woman he found more attractive. Kaplan noted that when she showed Trump a picture of Carroll greeting him at a social event in the 1980s, he mistook her for Marla Maples, his second wife. "The truth is that E. Jean Carroll, a former cheerleader and Miss Indiana, was exactly Donald Trump's type," Kaplan told the jury.
8 Reasons Why E. Jean Carroll Won Her Sexual Abuse and Defamation Lawsuit Against Trump
It is not hard to see why the jury concluded that the incident she described probably happened.
Fifth, Trump did himself no favors during a deposition in which Carroll's lead lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, asked him about those remarks. "Well, historically that's true with stars," he said. "It's true with stars that they can grab women by the pussy?" Kaplan asked. "If you look over the last million years," Trump replied, "I guess that's been largely true, not always, but largely true—unfortunately or fortunately." When Kaplan asked if Trump considered himself "a star," he said, "I think you can say that, yeah."
Sixth, Trump insisted that he did not know Carroll, despite photographic evidence that they had met, and his denial of her charges hinged largely on his claim that "she's not my type"—as if he could imagine behaving as Carroll claimed he had with a woman he found more attractive. Kaplan noted that when she showed Trump a picture of Carroll greeting him at a social event in the 1980s, he mistook her for Marla Maples, his second wife. "The truth is that E. Jean Carroll, a former cheerleader and Miss Indiana, was exactly Donald Trump's type," Kaplan told the jury.
8 Reasons Why E. Jean Carroll Won Her Sexual Abuse and Defamation Lawsuit Against Trump
It is not hard to see why the jury concluded that the incident she described probably happened.
Fifth, Trump did himself no favors during a deposition in which Carroll's lead lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, asked him about those remarks. "Well, historically that's true with stars," he said. "It's true with stars that they can grab women by the pussy?" Kaplan asked. "If you look over the last million years," Trump replied, "I guess that's been largely true, not always, but largely true—unfortunately or fortunately." When Kaplan asked if Trump considered himself "a star," he said, "I think you can say that, yeah."
Sixth, Trump insisted that he did not know Carroll, despite photographic evidence that they had met, and his denial of her charges hinged largely on his claim that "she's not my type"—as if he could imagine behaving as Carroll claimed he had with a woman he found more attractive. Kaplan noted that when she showed Trump a picture of Carroll greeting him at a social event in the 1980s, he mistook her for Marla Maples, his second wife. "The truth is that E. Jean Carroll, a former cheerleader and Miss Indiana, was exactly Donald Trump's type," Kaplan told the jury.
8 Reasons Why E. Jean Carroll Won Her Sexual Abuse and Defamation Lawsuit Against Trump
It is not hard to see why the jury concluded that the incident she described probably happened.
Fifth, Trump did himself no favors during a deposition in which Carroll's lead lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, asked him about those remarks. "Well, historically that's true with stars," he said. "It's true with stars that they can grab women by the pussy?" Kaplan asked. "If you look over the last million years," Trump replied, "I guess that's been largely true, not always, but largely true—unfortunately or fortunately." When Kaplan asked if Trump considered himself "a star," he said, "I think you can say that, yeah."
Sixth, Trump insisted that he did not know Carroll, despite photographic evidence that they had met, and his denial of her charges hinged largely on his claim that "she's not my type"—as if he could imagine behaving as Carroll claimed he had with a woman he found more attractive. Kaplan noted that when she showed Trump a picture of Carroll greeting him at a social event in the 1980s, he mistook her for Marla Maples, his second wife. "The truth is that E. Jean Carroll, a former cheerleader and Miss Indiana, was exactly Donald Trump's type," Kaplan told the jury.
HokieFanDC wrote: ↑Wed May 10, 2023 7:53 pm
Yep, what hville said. Yep, eyeroll emojis, well-deserved.
What was your comment about asymmetrical justice referring to?
And yet, you still haven't answered the question.
"What was your comment about asymmetrical justice referring to?"
What about this case shows two sets of laws? What did the judge do that he shouldn't have done?
I have answered the question. Hundreds of times here. You guys are just being obtuse cheerleaders.
Yay! They got that bAd oRaNGeMaN~!
Look. I don't care if the man did something wrong and is found guilty. But let's apply this stuff equally, to all. Not selectively because the man wears too-long ties and has a comb over and mean tweets.
What about this case doesn't show that there are two sets of laws?
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
HokieFanDC wrote: ↑Wed May 10, 2023 7:53 pm
Yep, what hville said. Yep, eyeroll emojis, well-deserved.
What was your comment about asymmetrical justice referring to?
And yet, you still haven't answered the question.
"What was your comment about asymmetrical justice referring to?"
What about this case shows two sets of laws? What did the judge do that he shouldn't have done?
I have answered the question. Hundreds of times here. You guys are just being obtuse cheerleaders.
Yay! They got that bAd oRaNGeMaN~!
Look. I don't care if the man did something wrong and is found guilty. But let's apply this stuff equally, to all. Not selectively because the man wears too-long ties and has a comb over and mean tweets.
What about this case doesn't show that there are two sets of laws?
You haven't answered anything about this case.
You simply made a broad statement about asymmetric justice.
I asked you what about this case was specifically different than similar cases.
HokieFanDC wrote: ↑Wed May 10, 2023 7:53 pm
Yep, what hville said. Yep, eyeroll emojis, well-deserved.
What was your comment about asymmetrical justice referring to?
And yet, you still haven't answered the question.
"What was your comment about asymmetrical justice referring to?"
What about this case shows two sets of laws? What did the judge do that he shouldn't have done?
I have answered the question. Hundreds of times here. You guys are just being obtuse cheerleaders.
Yay! They got that bAd oRaNGeMaN~!
Look. I don't care if the man did something wrong and is found guilty. But let's apply this stuff equally, to all. Not selectively because the man wears too-long ties and has a comb over and mean tweets.
What about this case doesn't show that there are two sets of laws?
You haven't answered anything about this case.
You simply made a broad statement about asymmetric justice.
I asked you what about this case was specifically different than similar cases.
Oh good grief, DC.
How about you come up with several cases involving a president, 30 year old rape claims, based on a TV show, and discharged before, and I will compare them to this one. Just the similar ones though, okay? ™
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
HokieFanDC wrote: ↑Wed May 10, 2023 7:53 pm
Yep, what hville said. Yep, eyeroll emojis, well-deserved.
What was your comment about asymmetrical justice referring to?
And yet, you still haven't answered the question.
"What was your comment about asymmetrical justice referring to?"
What about this case shows two sets of laws? What did the judge do that he shouldn't have done?
I have answered the question. Hundreds of times here. You guys are just being obtuse cheerleaders.
Yay! They got that bAd oRaNGeMaN~!
Look. I don't care if the man did something wrong and is found guilty. But let's apply this stuff equally, to all. Not selectively because the man wears too-long ties and has a comb over and mean tweets.
What about this case doesn't show that there are two sets of laws?
You haven't answered anything about this case.
You simply made a broad statement about asymmetric justice.
I asked you what about this case was specifically different than similar cases.
Oh good grief, DC.
How about you come up with several cases involving a president, 30 year old rape claims, based on a TV show, and discharged before, and I will compare them to this one. Just the similar ones though, okay? ™
I'm not the one that made a comment about this trial being asymmetrc application of justice.
8 Reasons Why E. Jean Carroll Won Her Sexual Abuse and Defamation Lawsuit Against Trump
It is not hard to see why the jury concluded that the incident she described probably happened.
Fifth, Trump did himself no favors during a deposition in which Carroll's lead lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, asked him about those remarks. "Well, historically that's true with stars," he said. "It's true with stars that they can grab women by the pussy?" Kaplan asked. "If you look over the last million years," Trump replied, "I guess that's been largely true, not always, but largely true—unfortunately or fortunately." When Kaplan asked if Trump considered himself "a star," he said, "I think you can say that, yeah."
Sixth, Trump insisted that he did not know Carroll, despite photographic evidence that they had met, and his denial of her charges hinged largely on his claim that "she's not my type"—as if he could imagine behaving as Carroll claimed he had with a woman he found more attractive. Kaplan noted that when she showed Trump a picture of Carroll greeting him at a social event in the 1980s, he mistook her for Marla Maples, his second wife. "The truth is that E. Jean Carroll, a former cheerleader and Miss Indiana, was exactly Donald Trump's type," Kaplan told the jury.
There never would have been a trial at all if he hadn't shot off his big stupid mouth raped a woman.
FTFY
Who did he rape?
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
HokieFanDC wrote: ↑Wed May 10, 2023 7:53 pm
Yep, what hville said. Yep, eyeroll emojis, well-deserved.
What was your comment about asymmetrical justice referring to?
And yet, you still haven't answered the question.
"What was your comment about asymmetrical justice referring to?"
What about this case shows two sets of laws? What did the judge do that he shouldn't have done?
I have answered the question. Hundreds of times here. You guys are just being obtuse cheerleaders.
Yay! They got that bAd oRaNGeMaN~!
Look. I don't care if the man did something wrong and is found guilty. But let's apply this stuff equally, to all. Not selectively because the man wears too-long ties and has a comb over and mean tweets.
What about this case doesn't show that there are two sets of laws?
You haven't answered anything about this case.
You simply made a broad statement about asymmetric justice.
I asked you what about this case was specifically different than similar cases.
There is no case here. At all.
Wussia, Wussia, Wussia
Yoookrayne quad quim pro
POTUS is a Wussian agent
Pee tapes
Kavanaugh
The list goes on...
All f'ing lies. We get it though. You don't care.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
8 Reasons Why E. Jean Carroll Won Her Sexual Abuse and Defamation Lawsuit Against Trump
It is not hard to see why the jury concluded that the incident she described probably happened.
Fifth, Trump did himself no favors during a deposition in which Carroll's lead lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, asked him about those remarks. "Well, historically that's true with stars," he said. "It's true with stars that they can grab women by the pussy?" Kaplan asked. "If you look over the last million years," Trump replied, "I guess that's been largely true, not always, but largely true—unfortunately or fortunately." When Kaplan asked if Trump considered himself "a star," he said, "I think you can say that, yeah."
Sixth, Trump insisted that he did not know Carroll, despite photographic evidence that they had met, and his denial of her charges hinged largely on his claim that "she's not my type"—as if he could imagine behaving as Carroll claimed he had with a woman he found more attractive. Kaplan noted that when she showed Trump a picture of Carroll greeting him at a social event in the 1980s, he mistook her for Marla Maples, his second wife. "The truth is that E. Jean Carroll, a former cheerleader and Miss Indiana, was exactly Donald Trump's type," Kaplan told the jury.
HokieFanDC wrote: ↑Wed May 10, 2023 7:53 pm
Yep, what hville said. Yep, eyeroll emojis, well-deserved.
What was your comment about asymmetrical justice referring to?
And yet, you still haven't answered the question.
"What was your comment about asymmetrical justice referring to?"
What about this case shows two sets of laws? What did the judge do that he shouldn't have done?
I have answered the question. Hundreds of times here. You guys are just being obtuse cheerleaders.
Yay! They got that bAd oRaNGeMaN~!
Look. I don't care if the man did something wrong and is found guilty. But let's apply this stuff equally, to all. Not selectively because the man wears too-long ties and has a comb over and mean tweets.
What about this case doesn't show that there are two sets of laws?
You haven't answered anything about this case.
You simply made a broad statement about asymmetric justice.
I asked you what about this case was specifically different than similar cases.
There is no case here. At all.
Wussia, Wussia, Wussia
Yoookrayne quad quim pro
POTUS is a Wussian agent
Pee tapes
Kavanaugh
The list goes on...
All f'ing lies. We get it though. You don't care.
You're as deluded and programmed as the Russia/Pee tape/Kavanaugh is a rapist crowd.
Your also completely FOS Joe.
With the exception that I think that Trump's Ukraine call was piss poor politics, I don’t think any of the things you listed are true.
8 Reasons Why E. Jean Carroll Won Her Sexual Abuse and Defamation Lawsuit Against Trump
It is not hard to see why the jury concluded that the incident she described probably happened.
Fifth, Trump did himself no favors during a deposition in which Carroll's lead lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, asked him about those remarks. "Well, historically that's true with stars," he said. "It's true with stars that they can grab women by the pussy?" Kaplan asked. "If you look over the last million years," Trump replied, "I guess that's been largely true, not always, but largely true—unfortunately or fortunately." When Kaplan asked if Trump considered himself "a star," he said, "I think you can say that, yeah."
Sixth, Trump insisted that he did not know Carroll, despite photographic evidence that they had met, and his denial of her charges hinged largely on his claim that "she's not my type"—as if he could imagine behaving as Carroll claimed he had with a woman he found more attractive. Kaplan noted that when she showed Trump a picture of Carroll greeting him at a social event in the 1980s, he mistook her for Marla Maples, his second wife. "The truth is that E. Jean Carroll, a former cheerleader and Miss Indiana, was exactly Donald Trump's type," Kaplan told the jury.
There never would have been a trial at all if he hadn't shot off his big stupid mouth raped a woman.
FTFY
Who did he rape?
It’s her word against his and she’s as credible as Ballsey Ford was……unfortunately, he’s not very credible either. Do I think this happened……nope.
You can't see how a philandering, misogynistic, narcissistic dope like Trump would sexually assault a young woman?
It's pretty much exactly what you would think he would be like. He doesn't even deny that he would do that, saying it may be fortunate that stars can do things that non-famous people couldn't do.
"What was your comment about asymmetrical justice referring to?"
What about this case shows two sets of laws? What did the judge do that he shouldn't have done?
I have answered the question. Hundreds of times here. You guys are just being obtuse cheerleaders.
Yay! They got that bAd oRaNGeMaN~!
Look. I don't care if the man did something wrong and is found guilty. But let's apply this stuff equally, to all. Not selectively because the man wears too-long ties and has a comb over and mean tweets.
What about this case doesn't show that there are two sets of laws?
You haven't answered anything about this case.
You simply made a broad statement about asymmetric justice.
I asked you what about this case was specifically different than similar cases.
Oh good grief, DC.
How about you come up with several cases involving a president, 30 year old rape claims, based on a TV show, and discharged before, and I will compare them to this one. Just the similar ones though, okay? ™
I'm not the one that made a comment about this trial being asymmetrc application of justice.
You don't have an example. No big deal.
Do you have an example of another "similar case" (your words)?
You don't. No big deal.
This trial is an example of asymmetric application of justice.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
HokieFanDC wrote: ↑Wed May 10, 2023 7:53 pm
Yep, what hville said. Yep, eyeroll emojis, well-deserved.
What was your comment about asymmetrical justice referring to?
And yet, you still haven't answered the question.
"What was your comment about asymmetrical justice referring to?"
What about this case shows two sets of laws? What did the judge do that he shouldn't have done?
I have answered the question. Hundreds of times here. You guys are just being obtuse cheerleaders.
Yay! They got that bAd oRaNGeMaN~!
Look. I don't care if the man did something wrong and is found guilty. But let's apply this stuff equally, to all. Not selectively because the man wears too-long ties and has a comb over and mean tweets.
What about this case doesn't show that there are two sets of laws?
You haven't answered anything about this case.
You simply made a broad statement about asymmetric justice.
I asked you what about this case was specifically different than similar cases.
There is no case here. At all.
Wussia, Wussia, Wussia
Yoookrayne quad quim pro
POTUS is a Wussian agent
Pee tapes
Kavanaugh
The list goes on...
All f'ing lies. We get it though. You don't care.
...add Hillary!, never convicted.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
8 Reasons Why E. Jean Carroll Won Her Sexual Abuse and Defamation Lawsuit Against Trump
It is not hard to see why the jury concluded that the incident she described probably happened.
Fifth, Trump did himself no favors during a deposition in which Carroll's lead lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, asked him about those remarks. "Well, historically that's true with stars," he said. "It's true with stars that they can grab women by the pussy?" Kaplan asked. "If you look over the last million years," Trump replied, "I guess that's been largely true, not always, but largely true—unfortunately or fortunately." When Kaplan asked if Trump considered himself "a star," he said, "I think you can say that, yeah."
Sixth, Trump insisted that he did not know Carroll, despite photographic evidence that they had met, and his denial of her charges hinged largely on his claim that "she's not my type"—as if he could imagine behaving as Carroll claimed he had with a woman he found more attractive. Kaplan noted that when she showed Trump a picture of Carroll greeting him at a social event in the 1980s, he mistook her for Marla Maples, his second wife. "The truth is that E. Jean Carroll, a former cheerleader and Miss Indiana, was exactly Donald Trump's type," Kaplan told the jury.
HokieFanDC wrote: ↑Thu May 11, 2023 3:22 pm
And yet, you still haven't answered the question.
"What was your comment about asymmetrical justice referring to?"
What about this case shows two sets of laws? What did the judge do that he shouldn't have done?
I have answered the question. Hundreds of times here. You guys are just being obtuse cheerleaders.
Yay! They got that bAd oRaNGeMaN~!
Look. I don't care if the man did something wrong and is found guilty. But let's apply this stuff equally, to all. Not selectively because the man wears too-long ties and has a comb over and mean tweets.
What about this case doesn't show that there are two sets of laws?
You haven't answered anything about this case.
You simply made a broad statement about asymmetric justice.
I asked you what about this case was specifically different than similar cases.
Oh good grief, DC.
How about you come up with several cases involving a president, 30 year old rape claims, based on a TV show, and discharged before, and I will compare them to this one. Just the similar ones though, okay? ™
I'm not the one that made a comment about this trial being asymmetrc application of justice.
You don't have an example. No big deal.
Do you have an example of another "similar case" (your words)?
You don't. No big deal.
This trial is an example of asymmetric application of justice.
I am sure there have been many civil jury trials where a guilty verdict of sexual assault was the result.....
Here's another famous guy, losing a civil suit on sexual assault. I mean, it's not exactly the same, because they actually found him guilty of rape, in addition to sexual assault.
RiverguyVT wrote: ↑Thu May 11, 2023 4:34 pm
I have answered the question. Hundreds of times here. You guys are just being obtuse cheerleaders.
Yay! They got that bAd oRaNGeMaN~!
Look. I don't care if the man did something wrong and is found guilty. But let's apply this stuff equally, to all. Not selectively because the man wears too-long ties and has a comb over and mean tweets.
What about this case doesn't show that there are two sets of laws?
You haven't answered anything about this case.
You simply made a broad statement about asymmetric justice.
I asked you what about this case was specifically different than similar cases.
Oh good grief, DC.
How about you come up with several cases involving a president, 30 year old rape claims, based on a TV show, and discharged before, and I will compare them to this one. Just the similar ones though, okay? ™
I'm not the one that made a comment about this trial being asymmetrc application of justice.
You don't have an example. No big deal.
Do you have an example of another "similar case" (your words)?
You don't. No big deal.
This trial is an example of asymmetric application of justice.
I am sure there have been many civil jury trials where a guilty verdict of sexual assault was the result.....
Here's another famous guy, losing a civil suit on sexual assault. I mean, it's not exactly the same, because they actually found him guilty of rape, in addition to sexual assault.
You haven't answered anything about this case.
You simply made a broad statement about asymmetric justice.
I asked you what about this case was specifically different than similar cases.
Oh good grief, DC.
How about you come up with several cases involving a president, 30 year old rape claims, based on a TV show, and discharged before, and I will compare them to this one. Just the similar ones though, okay? ™
I'm not the one that made a comment about this trial being asymmetrc application of justice.
You don't have an example. No big deal.
Do you have an example of another "similar case" (your words)?
You don't. No big deal.
This trial is an example of asymmetric application of justice.
I am sure there have been many civil jury trials where a guilty verdict of sexual assault was the result.....
Here's another famous guy, losing a civil suit on sexual assault. I mean, it's not exactly the same, because they actually found him guilty of rape, in addition to sexual assault.
You haven't answered anything about this case.
You simply made a broad statement about asymmetric justice.
I asked you what about this case was specifically different than similar cases.
Oh good grief, DC.
How about you come up with several cases involving a president, 30 year old rape claims, based on a TV show, and discharged before, and I will compare them to this one. Just the similar ones though, okay? ™
I'm not the one that made a comment about this trial being asymmetrc application of justice.
You don't have an example. No big deal.
Do you have an example of another "similar case" (your words)?
You don't. No big deal.
This trial is an example of asymmetric application of justice.
I am sure there have been many civil jury trials where a guilty verdict of sexual assault was the result.....
Here's another famous guy, losing a civil suit on sexual assault. I mean, it's not exactly the same, because they actually found him guilty of rape, in addition to sexual assault.
How about you come up with several cases involving a president, 30 year old rape claims, based on a TV show, and discharged before, and I will compare them to this one. Just the similar ones though, okay? ™
I'm not the one that made a comment about this trial being asymmetrc application of justice.
You don't have an example. No big deal.
Do you have an example of another "similar case" (your words)?
You don't. No big deal.
This trial is an example of asymmetric application of justice.
I am sure there have been many civil jury trials where a guilty verdict of sexual assault was the result.....
Here's another famous guy, losing a civil suit on sexual assault. I mean, it's not exactly the same, because they actually found him guilty of rape, in addition to sexual assault.
How about you come up with several cases involving a president, 30 year old rape claims, based on a TV show, and discharged before, and I will compare them to this one. Just the similar ones though, okay? ™
I'm not the one that made a comment about this trial being asymmetrc application of justice.
You don't have an example. No big deal.
Do you have an example of another "similar case" (your words)?
You don't. No big deal.
This trial is an example of asymmetric application of justice.
I am sure there have been many civil jury trials where a guilty verdict of sexual assault was the result.....
Here's another famous guy, losing a civil suit on sexual assault. I mean, it's not exactly the same, because they actually found him guilty of rape, in addition to sexual assault.
