Sussman, Georgia Tech and the Clinton’s. Of course!

[HokieJoe]

LOL @Turley. He's become such a publicity ho, he'll say anything. The idea that someone's donation history.should disqualify them, is ludicrously stupid.

democrats and dimbulb socialists are untrustworthy as jurors.

[RiverguyVT]

LOL @Turley. He's become such a publicity ho, he'll say anything. The idea that someone's donation history.should disqualify them, is ludicrously stupid.

Not at all.

Wow.

[RiverguyVT]

rut-roh.

It won't matter. The jury is rigged.

[UpstateSCHokie]

[HooFighter]

[dunwithtrump]

...that everything the rightloon media has been telling them for YEARS is eventually walked back, fact-checked into hilarity, and shown to be utter BS, and that every rightwing grifter is successfully raising money from them using conspiracies that are proven to be derived from their anal orifice?

If you just do a little due diligence outside of your media bublles you will realize they have been lying to you all along simply to increase their grift profits and political power (especially tRump). And you all fall for it hook, line, and sinker. Turn off Faux News/OAN/NewsMax and back away if you want to live.

It's a good thing P.T. Barnum isn't around today. Y'all wouldn't stand a chance.

[RiverguyVT]

The facts don't support an acquittal.
Oh well. IIWII

[dunwithtrump]

The facts don't support an acquittal.
Oh well. IIWII

Thank you Justice River.
Where did you go to law school again? Virginia Tech University? Nice!

[UpstateSCHokie]

The facts don't support an acquittal.
Oh well. IIWII

[HokieHam]

What’s funny is the two Unusuals here after both of them believed the Russian Collusion story and countless others pushed to them by the MoT. One who believed the….well, you know.

Man, if PT Barnum was alive today…..

[HokieFanDC]

LOL @Turley. He's become such a publicity ho, he'll say anything. The idea that someone's donation history.should disqualify them, is ludicrously stupid.

Not at all.

Wow.

Why should it be a reason for disqualification???

And why do you think the prosecution didn't use either their peremptory challenges, or asked to have them dismissed for cause??? Maybe because the history of legal precedent disagrees with you and Turley.

[HokieJoe]

Rigged jury and trial.

And yet, the trial did prove that the Russian collusion story was complete bullish!t and it came from Hillary Clinton herself. We also know that Federal law enforcement agencies and a special counsel were enlisted to prosecute a political rival.

Anyone with a brain in their skull could see the whole affair was 100% politically motivated bullish!t...Except for the unusual's, who believed it all was true...Because they're stupid.

[HokieJoe]

Just a reminder for the dummies among us:

[dunwithtrump]

Rigged jury and trial.

And yet, the trial did prove that the Russian collusion story was complete bullish!t and it came from Hillary Clinton herself. We also know that Federal law enforcement agencies and a special counsel were enlisted to prosecute a political rival.

Anyone with a brain in their skull could see the whole affair was 100% politically motivated bullish!t...Except for the unusual's, who believed it all was true...Because they're stupid.

STEP RIGHT UP. RIGHT THIS WAY TO SEE THE EGRESS!!!

[HokieJoe]

Rigged jury and trial.

And yet, the trial did prove that the Russian collusion story was complete bullish!t and it came from Hillary Clinton herself. We also know that Federal law enforcement agencies and a special counsel were enlisted to prosecute a political rival.

Anyone with a brain in their skull could see the whole affair was 100% politically motivated bullish!t...Except for the unusual's, who believed it all was true...Because they're stupid.

STEP RIGHT UP. RIGHT THIS WAY TO SEE THE EGRESS!!!

Try drinking less paint stripper. I hear that improves cognition. Hopefully, it's not too late.

[dunwithtrump]

Deluded
Uninformed
Misanthropic
Barbarous

Asinine
Stupid

Ridiculous
Obtuse
Cretinous
Kooky
Silly

[HokieHam]

Deluded
Uninformed
Misanthropic
Barbarous

Asinine
Stupid

Ridiculous
Obtuse
Cretinous
Kooky
Silly

Self reflection is good, Recip.

[HokieJoe]

Deluded
Uninformed
Misanthropic
Barbarous

Asinine
Stupid

Ridiculous
Obtuse
Cretinous
Kooky
Silly

Through all of those MEK fumes, you somehow managed to respond with a word salad of terms you faintly understand. Impressive!

[RiverguyVT]

The facts don't support an acquittal.
Oh well. IIWII

Thank you Justice River.
Where did you go to law school again? Virginia Tech University? Nice!

Same school as Norm MacDonald - The University of Science.

Good grief, Recip. There was a receipt he handed in to the Clinton campaign for reimbursement.

Two sets of laws. IIWII

[RiverguyVT]

LOL @Turley. He's become such a publicity ho, he'll say anything. The idea that someone's donation history.should disqualify them, is ludicrously stupid.

Not at all.

Wow.

Why should it be a reason for disqualification???

And why do you think the prosecution didn't use either their peremptory challenges, or asked to have them dismissed for cause??? Maybe because the history of legal precedent disagrees with you and Turley.

To be so invested in the well being and promotion of a defendant's interests that one is giving money to promote and advance those interests and that defendant?

Yeah. No bias there.

A juror said:
"“I don’t think it should have been prosecuted. There are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI.”

[dunwithtrump]

Focus Sparky, focus.

[HokieJoe]

LOL @Turley. He's become such a publicity ho, he'll say anything. The idea that someone's donation history.should disqualify them, is ludicrously stupid.

Not at all.

Wow.

Why should it be a reason for disqualification???

And why do you think the prosecution didn't use either their peremptory challenges, or asked to have them dismissed for cause??? Maybe because the history of legal precedent disagrees with you and Turley.

To be so invested in the well being and promotion of a defendant's interests that one is giving money to promote and advance those interests and that defendant?

Yeah. No bias there.

A juror said:
"“I don’t think it should have been prosecuted. There are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI.”

I'd be a great stealth juror. I haven't donated to any political party.

[HokieFanDC]

LOL @Turley. He's become such a publicity ho, he'll say anything. The idea that someone's donation history.should disqualify them, is ludicrously stupid.

Not at all.

Wow.

Why should it be a reason for disqualification???

And why do you think the prosecution didn't use either their peremptory challenges, or asked to have them dismissed for cause??? Maybe because the history of legal precedent disagrees with you and Turley.

To be so invested in the well being and promotion of a defendant's interests that one is giving money to promote and advance those interests and that defendant?

Yeah. No bias there.

A juror said:
"“I don’t think it should have been prosecuted. There are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI.”

There were jurors that donated money to Sussman...the defendant??? Who knew!???!!!
The verdict was unanimous. Durham must be the absolute worst at voir dire.

Also fairly certain that the majority of ppl in the US would agree with that juror about "bigger things", including 90% of UWS.

[HokieJoe]

LOL @Turley. He's become such a publicity ho, he'll say anything. The idea that someone's donation history.should disqualify them, is ludicrously stupid.

Not at all.

Wow.

Why should it be a reason for disqualification???

And why do you think the prosecution didn't use either their peremptory challenges, or asked to have them dismissed for cause??? Maybe because the history of legal precedent disagrees with you and Turley.

To be so invested in the well being and promotion of a defendant's interests that one is giving money to promote and advance those interests and that defendant?

Yeah. No bias there.

A juror said:
"“I don’t think it should have been prosecuted. There are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI.”

There were jurors that donated money to Sussman...the defendant??? Who knew!???!!!
The verdict was unanimous. Durham must be the absolute worst at voir dire.

Also fairly certain that the majority of ppl in the US would agree with that juror about "bigger things", including 90% of UWS.

IOW, it's a very discomforting situation for lefties, so there are more iMpOrTaNt things to fOcUs on...Like fixing the problems leftist DF's voted for in electing Biden.

[RiverguyVT]

pretty much, Joe.