SCOTUS set to overturn Roe v Wade……and of course

[HokieHam]

It was leaked by a leftist to interfere with the court decision.

Death cult. Period.

Disgusting. I hope it’s true and they hold fast.

Im betting this was a coordinated leak on a Monday, not the usual Friday dump. There are probably multiple entities involved here and it was discussed over a period of a couple of months.

[HokieHam]

The screeching demons are already gathering at the SCOTUS building.

Handmaidens Tale! Reeeeeee.

[RiverguyVT]

Ho! I hadn't seen yours when I started a new thread.

https://apnews.com/article/roe-wade-sup ... d3be325786

LEAKS

Now who do you reckon did that?

[nolanvt]

Leaks are going to happen with something as high stakes as this.

[hokie80]

Leaks are going to happen with something as high stakes as this.

And they still need to be investigated and the leaker(s) prosecuted if any laws were broken.

[nolanvt]

Leaks are going to happen with something as high stakes as this.

And they still need to be investigated and the leaker(s) prosecuted if any laws were broken.

Unless I'm missing something, leaking a draft opinion does not break any laws.

[hokie80]

Leaks are going to happen with something as high stakes as this.

And they still need to be investigated and the leaker(s) prosecuted if any laws were broken.

Unless I'm missing something, leaking a draft opinion does not break any laws.

Hence the “if”.

Either way, the leaker(s) should be fired/dismissed.

[HokieHam]

Leaks are going to happen with something as high stakes as this.

A full draft of a decision has never been leaked before in the modern era of the court. This is for nothing but to intimidation. If it is determined that a sitting Justice encouraged it, they should be impeached. The person responsible should face jail time if the law permits. Once again, the left setting precedents………and dangerous ones.

[RiverguyVT]

iNsUrReCTiOn~!!!!

[nolanvt]

Leaks are going to happen with something as high stakes as this.

A full draft of a decision has never been leaked before in the modern era of the court. This is for nothing but to intimidation. If it is determined that a sitting Justice encouraged it, they should be impeached. The person responsible should face jail time if the law permits. Once again, the left setting precedents………and dangerous ones.

Do you know for sure that it was someone from the Left who leaked it?

[RiverguyVT]

Leaks are going to happen with something as high stakes as this.

A full draft of a decision has never been leaked before in the modern era of the court. This is for nothing but to intimidation. If it is determined that a sitting Justice encouraged it, they should be impeached. The person responsible should face jail time if the law permits. Once again, the left setting precedents………and dangerous ones.

Do you know for sure that it was someone from the Left who leaked it?

LOL

[hokie80]

iNsUrReCTiOn~!!!!

Chanting “pack the court” doesn’t meet the definition of an insurrection.

And I’m sure you are aware that it would be legal under our constitution to add to the number of SCOTUS judges.

Not that I want that. But I’m not the one making a false equivalency.

[RiverguyVT]

iNsUrReCTiOn~!!!!

Chanting “pack the court” doesn’t meet the definition of an insurrection.

And I’m sure you are aware that it would be legal under our constitution to add to the number of SCOTUS judges.

Not that I want that. But I’m not the one making a false equivalency.

[HokieHam]

Leaks are going to happen with something as high stakes as this.

A full draft of a decision has never been leaked before in the modern era of the court. This is for nothing but to intimidation. If it is determined that a sitting Justice encouraged it, they should be impeached. The person responsible should face jail time if the law permits. Once again, the left setting precedents………and dangerous ones.

Do you know for sure that it was someone from the Left who leaked it?

You willing to place bets?

[HokieHam]

iNsUrReCTiOn~!!!!

Chanting “pack the court” doesn’t meet the definition of an insurrection.

And I’m sure you are aware that it would be legal under our constitution to add to the number of SCOTUS judges.

Not that I want that. But I’m not the one making a false equivalency.

Dude. If this is true and happens, the “summer of love” is going to look like child’s play…….

[hokie80]

iNsUrReCTiOn~!!!!

Chanting “pack the court” doesn’t meet the definition of an insurrection.

And I’m sure you are aware that it would be legal under our constitution to add to the number of SCOTUS judges.

Not that I want that. But I’m not the one making a false equivalency.

So you have nothing. Just emotional claptrap and outrage. Got it.

Meanwhile, I’m right. Again.

[hokie80]

iNsUrReCTiOn~!!!!

Chanting “pack the court” doesn’t meet the definition of an insurrection.

And I’m sure you are aware that it would be legal under our constitution to add to the number of SCOTUS judges.

Not that I want that. But I’m not the one making a false equivalency.

Dude. If this is true and happens, the “summer of love” is going to look like child’s play…….

That may be true.

But that isn’t what was shown.

[HokieHam]

The Only Reason To Leak That SCOTUS Opinion Is To Bully Justices Into Submission

https://thefederalist.com/2022/05/03/th ... ubmission/

[hokie80]

What will happen (if true) is that the HOR will pass legislation making abortion legal in the US.

Manchin will be the key vote in the senate on this.

But we will see the nuclear option put in play.

And this will galvanize the dems and they will go out to the polls in massive numbers never seen for a mid-term election.

[HvilleHokie]

What will happen (if true) is that the HOR will pass legislation making abortion legal in the US.

Manchin will be the key vote in the senate on this.

But we will see the nuclear option put in play.

And this will galvanize the dems and they will go out to the polls in massive numbers never seen for a mid-term election.

I do think this will hurt the republicans in other areas

[RiverguyVT]

What will happen (if true) is that the HOR will pass legislation making abortion legal in the US.

Manchin will be the key vote in the senate on this.

But we will see the nuclear option put in play.

And this will galvanize the dems and they will go out to the polls in massive numbers never seen for a mid-term election.

I do think this will hurt the republicans in other areas

Like I said in another thread, this could be the one thing to stem a massive red wave.

AND... now that I think about it, it wouldn't shock me at all to later learn this leak is a forgery. Bad intel, a'la peetapes.

[HokieHam]

What will happen (if true) is that the HOR will pass legislation making abortion legal in the US.

Manchin will be the key vote in the senate on this.

But we will see the nuclear option put in play.

And this will galvanize the dems and they will go out to the polls in massive numbers never seen for a mid-term election.

I do think this will hurt the republicans in other areas

Like I said in another thread, this could be the one thing to stem a massive red wave.

AND... now that I think about it, it wouldn't shock me at all to later learn this leak is a forgery. Bad intel, a'la peetapes.

Yup. Who knows. I’ve thought about that too. I’ll believe it when I see it.

[HokieHam]

[Uprising]

Leaks are going to happen with something as high stakes as this.

A full draft of a decision has never been leaked before in the modern era of the court. This is for nothing but to intimidation. If it is determined that a sitting Justice encouraged it, they should be impeached. The person responsible should face jail time if the law permits. Once again, the left setting precedents………and dangerous ones.

It's absolutely hilarious to base your argument for the inappropriateness of leaking this document on precedents and norms when this court is routinely destroying them both.

And to suggest that whomever did this should face jail time is an incredibly authoritarian view.... Not that I'm surprised. It's going to be hilarious to watch the 180 here if it turns out this was all orchestrated by the conservatives to deflect attention from the graveness of this opinion and give their base a the red herring they will desperately cling to.

[HokieHam]

Leaks are going to happen with something as high stakes as this.

A full draft of a decision has never been leaked before in the modern era of the court. This is for nothing but to intimidation. If it is determined that a sitting Justice encouraged it, they should be impeached. The person responsible should face jail time if the law permits. Once again, the left setting precedents………and dangerous ones.

It's absolutely hilarious to base your argument for the inappropriateness of leaking this document on precedents and norms when this court is routinely destroying them both.

And to suggest that whomever did this should face jail time is an incredibly authoritarian view.... Not that I'm surprised. It's going to be hilarious to watch the 180 here if it turns out this was all orchestrated by the conservatives to deflect attention from the graveness of this opinion and give their base a the red herring they will desperately cling to.

If a precedent and “norm” is unconstitutional…..it should be overturned. But you just want babies slaughtered.

I said if a law was broken. If it was, jail time is appropriate. Orchestrated by conservatives? I’m in a betting mood…..as noted above.

Meanwhile, go back to your altar.