SCOTUS set to overturn Roe v Wade……and of course

[HokieHam]

https://news.gallup.com/poll/506759/bro ... dobbs.aspx

And?

[Mcl3 Hokie]

https://news.gallup.com/poll/506759/bro ... dobbs.aspx

I’m sure you could probably find a similar acceptance rate for lobotomies during their medical use. Doesn’t make it right.

[HokieHam]

https://news.gallup.com/poll/506759/bro ... dobbs.aspx

I’m sure you could probably find a similar acceptance rate for lobotomies during their medical use. Doesn’t make it right.

I’m sure slavery would have polled high back in the day……

[HokieHam]

Vandalism of Waldo County church stirs conversation over hate crimes

After an anti-abortion sign was covered in paint, worshipers at one congregation in Palermo are calling for legal action.

https://www.newscentermaine.com/articl ... fca63908eb

[HokieHam]

Good stuffz

Federal appeals court blocks Biden admin bid to require ER doctors to perform abortions

https://justthenews.com/government/cour ... -abortions

[HokieHam]

Yup…..two sets of laws…..

[Major Kong]

Yup…..two sets of laws…..

[HokieJoe]

Yup…..two sets of laws…..

Biden hates the Constitution.

[UpstateSCHokie]

Yup…..two sets of laws…..

And remember, many on this board voted for this.

[HokieFanDC]

Yup…..two sets of laws…..

Biden hates the Constitution.

Biden is an idiot, but I'm pretty sure he's not involved in the charges (if he has any idea about any of the FACE Act violations that have been charged).
And we still don't know what the sentence will be. IMO, they should be charged, maybe with a violation, but if charged with a fed offense, the sentence should be light.

In the Tennessee situation, all of them are guilty of violating the FACE Act, and all of them knew they were violating it. They should have been arrested and charged with something. None of them should be given anything close to the max sentence allowed.

The DOJ did the same thing last year with a reproductive health clinic, where some activists spray painted messages on the walls, things like "If abortions aren’t safe, neither are you". Should they be charged? Yep. With a federal offense, probably not.
And certainly not anything near the max allowed under FACE.

The FACE Act has become the FARCE Act.

[RiverguyVT]

Yup…..two sets of laws…..

Biden hates the Constitution.

Biden is an idiot, but I'm pretty sure he's not involved in the charges (if he has any idea about any of the FACE Act violations that have been charged).
And we still don't know what the sentence will be. IMO, they should be charged, maybe with a violation, but if charged with a fed offense, the sentence should be light.

In the Tennessee situation, all of them are guilty of violating the FACE Act, and all of them knew they were violating it. They should have been arrested and charged with something. None of them should be given anything close to the max sentence allowed.

The DOJ did the same thing last year with a reproductive health clinic, where some activists spray painted messages on the walls, things like "If abortions aren’t safe, neither are you". Should they be charged? Yep. With a federal offense, probably not.
And certainly not anything near the max allowed under FACE.

The FACE Act has become the FARCE Act.

LOL
He has nothing to do with anything that's going on.
Full on "Weekend at Bernies". The man's brain is shot.
He doesn't velcro his own shoes.

But this is what makes his admin so dangerous. He's a puppet, with unidentified and unaccountable handlers. <--that's a dangerous combo, unidentified & unaccountable, especially when coupled w/ a totalitarian mindset/goal.

And yes.
This is a perfect example of there being two sets of laws.

[HokieFanDC]

Yup…..two sets of laws…..

Biden hates the Constitution.

Biden is an idiot, but I'm pretty sure he's not involved in the charges (if he has any idea about any of the FACE Act violations that have been charged).
And we still don't know what the sentence will be. IMO, they should be charged, maybe with a violation, but if charged with a fed offense, the sentence should be light.

In the Tennessee situation, all of them are guilty of violating the FACE Act, and all of them knew they were violating it. They should have been arrested and charged with something. None of them should be given anything close to the max sentence allowed.

The DOJ did the same thing last year with a reproductive health clinic, where some activists spray painted messages on the walls, things like "If abortions aren’t safe, neither are you". Should they be charged? Yep. With a federal offense, probably not.
And certainly not anything near the max allowed under FACE.

The FACE Act has become the FARCE Act.

LOL
He has nothing to do with anything that's going on.
Full on "Weekend at Bernies". The man's brain is shot.
He doesn't velcro his own shoes.

But this is what makes his admin so dangerous. He's a puppet, with unidentified and unaccountable handlers. <--that's a dangerous combo, unidentified & unaccountable, especially when coupled w/ a totalitarian mindset/goal.

And yes.
This is a perfect example of there being two sets of laws.

It's a perfect example of two sets of laws when the DOJ arrests both a pro-abortion group and an anti-abortion group, and charges both of them under the FACE Act, when there was no actual violence?

How is that a perfect example???

[HokieHam]

Yup…..two sets of laws…..

Biden hates the Constitution.

Biden is an idiot, but I'm pretty sure he's not involved in the charges (if he has any idea about any of the FACE Act violations that have been charged).
And we still don't know what the sentence will be. IMO, they should be charged, maybe with a violation, but if charged with a fed offense, the sentence should be light.

In the Tennessee situation, all of them are guilty of violating the FACE Act, and all of them knew they were violating it. They should have been arrested and charged with something. None of them should be given anything close to the max sentence allowed.

The DOJ did the same thing last year with a reproductive health clinic, where some activists spray painted messages on the walls, things like "If abortions aren’t safe, neither are you". Should they be charged? Yep. With a federal offense, probably not.
And certainly not anything near the max allowed under FACE.

The FACE Act has become the FARCE Act.

All you had to say was your last sentence.

There is a difference between just sitting and praying and vandalizing a building with threats of violence……

[HokieFanDC]

Yup…..two sets of laws…..

Biden hates the Constitution.

Biden is an idiot, but I'm pretty sure he's not involved in the charges (if he has any idea about any of the FACE Act violations that have been charged).
And we still don't know what the sentence will be. IMO, they should be charged, maybe with a violation, but if charged with a fed offense, the sentence should be light.

In the Tennessee situation, all of them are guilty of violating the FACE Act, and all of them knew they were violating it. They should have been arrested and charged with something. None of them should be given anything close to the max sentence allowed.

The DOJ did the same thing last year with a reproductive health clinic, where some activists spray painted messages on the walls, things like "If abortions aren’t safe, neither are you". Should they be charged? Yep. With a federal offense, probably not.
And certainly not anything near the max allowed under FACE.

The FACE Act has become the FARCE Act.

All you had to say was your last sentence.

There is a difference between just sitting and praying and vandalizing a building with threats of violence……

You are right that there is a difference in what the 2 groups did. You also know you're spreading a lie.
They weren't just sitting and praying. They were physically blocking the entrances to health clinics and deterring people from going to their appointments.

[HokieHam]

Yup…..two sets of laws…..

Biden hates the Constitution.

Biden is an idiot, but I'm pretty sure he's not involved in the charges (if he has any idea about any of the FACE Act violations that have been charged).
And we still don't know what the sentence will be. IMO, they should be charged, maybe with a violation, but if charged with a fed offense, the sentence should be light.

In the Tennessee situation, all of them are guilty of violating the FACE Act, and all of them knew they were violating it. They should have been arrested and charged with something. None of them should be given anything close to the max sentence allowed.

The DOJ did the same thing last year with a reproductive health clinic, where some activists spray painted messages on the walls, things like "If abortions aren’t safe, neither are you". Should they be charged? Yep. With a federal offense, probably not.
And certainly not anything near the max allowed under FACE.

The FACE Act has become the FARCE Act.

All you had to say was your last sentence.

There is a difference between just sitting and praying and vandalizing a building with threats of violence……

You are right that there is a difference in what the 2 groups did. You also know you're spreading a lie.
They weren't just sitting and praying. They were physically blocking the entrances to health clinics and deterring people from going to their appointments.

Health clinics. That’s all you had to write………..talk about spreading a lie.

[HokieFanDC]

Biden hates the Constitution.

Biden is an idiot, but I'm pretty sure he's not involved in the charges (if he has any idea about any of the FACE Act violations that have been charged).
And we still don't know what the sentence will be. IMO, they should be charged, maybe with a violation, but if charged with a fed offense, the sentence should be light.

In the Tennessee situation, all of them are guilty of violating the FACE Act, and all of them knew they were violating it. They should have been arrested and charged with something. None of them should be given anything close to the max sentence allowed.

The DOJ did the same thing last year with a reproductive health clinic, where some activists spray painted messages on the walls, things like "If abortions aren’t safe, neither are you". Should they be charged? Yep. With a federal offense, probably not.
And certainly not anything near the max allowed under FACE.

The FACE Act has become the FARCE Act.

All you had to say was your last sentence.

There is a difference between just sitting and praying and vandalizing a building with threats of violence……

You are right that there is a difference in what the 2 groups did. You also know you're spreading a lie.
They weren't just sitting and praying. They were physically blocking the entrances to health clinics and deterring people from going to their appointments.

Health clinics. That’s all you had to write………..talk about spreading a lie.

It's literally called a health clinic. But, sure, abortion clinic.

They were blocking the entrances so people couldn't get in and out. That is why they are guilty.

[HokieHam]

Biden hates the Constitution.

Biden is an idiot, but I'm pretty sure he's not involved in the charges (if he has any idea about any of the FACE Act violations that have been charged).
And we still don't know what the sentence will be. IMO, they should be charged, maybe with a violation, but if charged with a fed offense, the sentence should be light.

In the Tennessee situation, all of them are guilty of violating the FACE Act, and all of them knew they were violating it. They should have been arrested and charged with something. None of them should be given anything close to the max sentence allowed.

The DOJ did the same thing last year with a reproductive health clinic, where some activists spray painted messages on the walls, things like "If abortions aren’t safe, neither are you". Should they be charged? Yep. With a federal offense, probably not.
And certainly not anything near the max allowed under FACE.

The FACE Act has become the FARCE Act.

All you had to say was your last sentence.

There is a difference between just sitting and praying and vandalizing a building with threats of violence……

You are right that there is a difference in what the 2 groups did. You also know you're spreading a lie.
They weren't just sitting and praying. They were physically blocking the entrances to health clinics and deterring people from going to their appointments.

Health clinics. That’s all you had to write………..talk about spreading a lie.

It's literally called a health clinic. But, sure, abortion clinic.

They were blocking the entrances so people couldn't get in and out. That is why they are guilty.

Yeah. It’s in the pic. It’s easy to see. I have no problem with it. The law is completely unconstitutional and only meant to protect their sacred sacrament of abortion. It’s meant to silence political dissent. And, yeah…..it’s called a health clinic and you know why…….or damn man, I would at least hope you do.

[HokieFanDC]

Biden is an idiot, but I'm pretty sure he's not involved in the charges (if he has any idea about any of the FACE Act violations that have been charged).
And we still don't know what the sentence will be. IMO, they should be charged, maybe with a violation, but if charged with a fed offense, the sentence should be light.

In the Tennessee situation, all of them are guilty of violating the FACE Act, and all of them knew they were violating it. They should have been arrested and charged with something. None of them should be given anything close to the max sentence allowed.

The DOJ did the same thing last year with a reproductive health clinic, where some activists spray painted messages on the walls, things like "If abortions aren’t safe, neither are you". Should they be charged? Yep. With a federal offense, probably not.
And certainly not anything near the max allowed under FACE.

The FACE Act has become the FARCE Act.

All you had to say was your last sentence.

There is a difference between just sitting and praying and vandalizing a building with threats of violence……

You are right that there is a difference in what the 2 groups did. You also know you're spreading a lie.
They weren't just sitting and praying. They were physically blocking the entrances to health clinics and deterring people from going to their appointments.

Health clinics. That’s all you had to write………..talk about spreading a lie.

It's literally called a health clinic. But, sure, abortion clinic.

They were blocking the entrances so people couldn't get in and out. That is why they are guilty.

Yeah. It’s in the pic. It’s easy to see. I have no problem with it. The law is completely unconstitutional and only meant to protect their sacred sacrament of abortion. It’s meant to silence political dissent. And, yeah…..it’s called a health clinic and you know why…….or damn man, I would at least hope you do.

There are pro-abortion and anti-abortion rallies all the time where people aren't arrested and charged under the FACE Act.
You have to proactively and purposefully take action to be charged under the FACE Act. They knew what they were doing. They knew they were breaking the law. It was purposeful.
There is clearly nothing unconstitutional about the law. You're not making any sense. Blocking access to any medical facility is simply wrong.

[HokieHam]

All you had to say was your last sentence.

There is a difference between just sitting and praying and vandalizing a building with threats of violence……

You are right that there is a difference in what the 2 groups did. You also know you're spreading a lie.
They weren't just sitting and praying. They were physically blocking the entrances to health clinics and deterring people from going to their appointments.

Health clinics. That’s all you had to write………..talk about spreading a lie.

It's literally called a health clinic. But, sure, abortion clinic.

They were blocking the entrances so people couldn't get in and out. That is why they are guilty.

Yeah. It’s in the pic. It’s easy to see. I have no problem with it. The law is completely unconstitutional and only meant to protect their sacred sacrament of abortion. It’s meant to silence political dissent. And, yeah…..it’s called a health clinic and you know why…….or damn man, I would at least hope you do.

There are pro-abortion and anti-abortion rallies all the time where people aren't arrested and charged under the FACE Act.
You have to proactively and purposefully take action to be charged under the FACE Act. They knew what they were doing. They knew they were breaking the law. It was purposeful.
There is clearly nothing unconstitutional about the law. You're not making any sense. Blocking access to any medical facility is simply wrong.

Medical clinic. And there it is……..

[HokieFanDC]

You are right that there is a difference in what the 2 groups did. You also know you're spreading a lie.
They weren't just sitting and praying. They were physically blocking the entrances to health clinics and deterring people from going to their appointments.

Health clinics. That’s all you had to write………..talk about spreading a lie.

It's literally called a health clinic. But, sure, abortion clinic.

They were blocking the entrances so people couldn't get in and out. That is why they are guilty.

Yeah. It’s in the pic. It’s easy to see. I have no problem with it. The law is completely unconstitutional and only meant to protect their sacred sacrament of abortion. It’s meant to silence political dissent. And, yeah…..it’s called a health clinic and you know why…….or damn man, I would at least hope you do.

There are pro-abortion and anti-abortion rallies all the time where people aren't arrested and charged under the FACE Act.
You have to proactively and purposefully take action to be charged under the FACE Act. They knew what they were doing. They knew they were breaking the law. It was purposeful.
There is clearly nothing unconstitutional about the law. You're not making any sense. Blocking access to any medical facility is simply wrong.

Medical clinic. And there it is……..

The building where they were protesting isn't just an abortion clinic. It's a medical office complex. The abortion clinic occupies one office in the building. There were people there who came to the center, not to the abortion clinic, for ultrasounds to see how their pregnancies were progressing, and if there were any issues. Some of these people had to go home because of the protestors blocking entrances.
That's the problem with them.

[HokieHam]

Health clinics. That’s all you had to write………..talk about spreading a lie.

It's literally called a health clinic. But, sure, abortion clinic.

They were blocking the entrances so people couldn't get in and out. That is why they are guilty.

Yeah. It’s in the pic. It’s easy to see. I have no problem with it. The law is completely unconstitutional and only meant to protect their sacred sacrament of abortion. It’s meant to silence political dissent. And, yeah…..it’s called a health clinic and you know why…….or damn man, I would at least hope you do.

There are pro-abortion and anti-abortion rallies all the time where people aren't arrested and charged under the FACE Act.
You have to proactively and purposefully take action to be charged under the FACE Act. They knew what they were doing. They knew they were breaking the law. It was purposeful.
There is clearly nothing unconstitutional about the law. You're not making any sense. Blocking access to any medical facility is simply wrong.

Medical clinic. And there it is……..

The building where they were protesting isn't just an abortion clinic. It's a medical office complex. The abortion clinic occupies one office in the building. There were people there who came to the center, not to the abortion clinic, for ultrasounds to see how their pregnancies were progressing, and if there were any issues. Some of these people had to go home because of the protestors blocking entrances.
That's the problem with them.

They’re literally sitting in front of the door to the slaughter mill……

[HokieFanDC]

It's literally called a health clinic. But, sure, abortion clinic.

They were blocking the entrances so people couldn't get in and out. That is why they are guilty.

Yeah. It’s in the pic. It’s easy to see. I have no problem with it. The law is completely unconstitutional and only meant to protect their sacred sacrament of abortion. It’s meant to silence political dissent. And, yeah…..it’s called a health clinic and you know why…….or damn man, I would at least hope you do.

There are pro-abortion and anti-abortion rallies all the time where people aren't arrested and charged under the FACE Act.
You have to proactively and purposefully take action to be charged under the FACE Act. They knew what they were doing. They knew they were breaking the law. It was purposeful.
There is clearly nothing unconstitutional about the law. You're not making any sense. Blocking access to any medical facility is simply wrong.

Medical clinic. And there it is……..

The building where they were protesting isn't just an abortion clinic. It's a medical office complex. The abortion clinic occupies one office in the building. There were people there who came to the center, not to the abortion clinic, for ultrasounds to see how their pregnancies were progressing, and if there were any issues. Some of these people had to go home because of the protestors blocking entrances.
That's the problem with them.

They’re literally sitting in front of the door to the slaughter mill……

Yep. Got it. So you agree they violated the law.

[RiverguyVT]

2 sets of laws

Pray by an abortion clinic? Off to Alcatraz!

Block a highway, bridge or city street on behalf of humus? Nothing.

[HokieHam]

Yeah. It’s in the pic. It’s easy to see. I have no problem with it. The law is completely unconstitutional and only meant to protect their sacred sacrament of abortion. It’s meant to silence political dissent. And, yeah…..it’s called a health clinic and you know why…….or damn man, I would at least hope you do.

There are pro-abortion and anti-abortion rallies all the time where people aren't arrested and charged under the FACE Act.
You have to proactively and purposefully take action to be charged under the FACE Act. They knew what they were doing. They knew they were breaking the law. It was purposeful.
There is clearly nothing unconstitutional about the law. You're not making any sense. Blocking access to any medical facility is simply wrong.

Medical clinic. And there it is……..

The building where they were protesting isn't just an abortion clinic. It's a medical office complex. The abortion clinic occupies one office in the building. There were people there who came to the center, not to the abortion clinic, for ultrasounds to see how their pregnancies were progressing, and if there were any issues. Some of these people had to go home because of the protestors blocking entrances.
That's the problem with them.

They’re literally sitting in front of the door to the slaughter mill……

Yep. Got it. So you agree they violated the law.

An unconstitutional law, as I’ve said.

[HokieFanDC]

There are pro-abortion and anti-abortion rallies all the time where people aren't arrested and charged under the FACE Act.
You have to proactively and purposefully take action to be charged under the FACE Act. They knew what they were doing. They knew they were breaking the law. It was purposeful.
There is clearly nothing unconstitutional about the law. You're not making any sense. Blocking access to any medical facility is simply wrong.

Medical clinic. And there it is……..

The building where they were protesting isn't just an abortion clinic. It's a medical office complex. The abortion clinic occupies one office in the building. There were people there who came to the center, not to the abortion clinic, for ultrasounds to see how their pregnancies were progressing, and if there were any issues. Some of these people had to go home because of the protestors blocking entrances.
That's the problem with them.

They’re literally sitting in front of the door to the slaughter mill……

Yep. Got it. So you agree they violated the law.

An unconstitutional law, as I’ve said.

Yeh,, you said it was unconstitutional. No offense, I'll take the stance of the legal experts in Congress, the Supreme Court, US Courts of Appeals, and Federal courts who rejected attempts at having it ruled unconstitutional.