New Press Secretary after Chucky…

[HokieHam]

She checks all the…..boxes……

Biden’s new press secretary sparks conflict-of-interest concerns over relationship with CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux

https://nypost.com/2022/05/06/bidens-ne ... -concerns/

[RiverguyVT]

aDuLtS aRe iN cHaRgE nOw~!

[VisorBoy]

She checks all the…..boxes……

Biden’s new press secretary sparks conflict-of-interest concerns over relationship with CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux

https://nypost.com/2022/05/06/bidens-ne ... -concerns/

Once again, you mention the race of an appointee as the reason for appointment. You've now done it on 2 occasions. Yet on a separate occasion, when a judge was, by most objective measures, unqualified to sit on the federal bench, you don't mention race at all, nor do you question credentials. But in these two instances, you do. Hmm, what do they have in common, I wonder...

[WEHRedux]

She checks all the…..boxes……

Biden’s new press secretary sparks conflict-of-interest concerns over relationship with CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux

https://nypost.com/2022/05/06/bidens-ne ... -concerns/

Once again, you mention the race of an appointee as the reason for appointment. You've now done it on 2 occasions. Yet on a separate occasion, when a judge was, by most objective measures, unqualified to sit on the federal bench, you don't mention race at all, nor do you question credentials. But in these two instances, you do. Hmm, what do they have in common, I wonder...

Which judge are you talking about?

[HokieHam]

She checks all the…..boxes……

Biden’s new press secretary sparks conflict-of-interest concerns over relationship with CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux

https://nypost.com/2022/05/06/bidens-ne ... -concerns/

Once again, you mention the race of an appointee as the reason for appointment. You've now done it on 2 occasions. Yet on a separate occasion, when a judge was, by most objective measures, unqualified to sit on the federal bench, you don't mention race at all, nor do you question credentials. But in these two instances, you do. Hmm, what do they have in common, I wonder...

You’re in the Party that is OBSESSED with race.

I’m pointing out the fact that she checks at least three intersectional boxes…….

You should be happy……….

[HokieJoe]

She checks all the…..boxes……

Biden’s new press secretary sparks conflict-of-interest concerns over relationship with CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux

https://nypost.com/2022/05/06/bidens-ne ... -concerns/

Once again, you mention the race of an appointee as the reason for appointment. You've now done it on 2 occasions. Yet on a separate occasion, when a judge was, by most objective measures, unqualified to sit on the federal bench, you don't mention race at all, nor do you question credentials. But in these two instances, you do. Hmm, what do they have in common, I wonder...

So?

democrats use race and/or sex, and/or sexual orientation and/or all of the above as criteria to hire people. Your party invites criticism for clear discrimination whether you want it or not.

[RiverguyVT]

She checks all the…..boxes……

Biden’s new press secretary sparks conflict-of-interest concerns over relationship with CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux

https://nypost.com/2022/05/06/bidens-ne ... -concerns/

Once again, you mention the race of an appointee as the reason for appointment. You've now done it on 2 occasions. Yet on a separate occasion, when a judge was, by most objective measures, unqualified to sit on the federal bench, you don't mention race at all, nor do you question credentials. But in these two instances, you do. Hmm, what do they have in common, I wonder...

Would you be a Khendi fan if he was white?

No, I didn't think so.
LOL

Your type is racist. You just don't understand what that means.

[VisorBoy]

She checks all the…..boxes……

Biden’s new press secretary sparks conflict-of-interest concerns over relationship with CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux

https://nypost.com/2022/05/06/bidens-ne ... -concerns/

Once again, you mention the race of an appointee as the reason for appointment. You've now done it on 2 occasions. Yet on a separate occasion, when a judge was, by most objective measures, unqualified to sit on the federal bench, you don't mention race at all, nor do you question credentials. But in these two instances, you do. Hmm, what do they have in common, I wonder...

You’re in the Party that is OBSESSED with race.

I’m pointing out the fact that she checks at least three intersectional boxes…….

You should be happy……….

Yes, you pointed out her race. That's exactly my point.

[HokieHam]

She checks all the…..boxes……

Biden’s new press secretary sparks conflict-of-interest concerns over relationship with CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux

https://nypost.com/2022/05/06/bidens-ne ... -concerns/

Once again, you mention the race of an appointee as the reason for appointment. You've now done it on 2 occasions. Yet on a separate occasion, when a judge was, by most objective measures, unqualified to sit on the federal bench, you don't mention race at all, nor do you question credentials. But in these two instances, you do. Hmm, what do they have in common, I wonder...

You’re in the Party that is OBSESSED with race.

I’m pointing out the fact that she checks at least three intersectional boxes…….

You should be happy……….

Yes, you pointed out her race. That's exactly my point.

And you’re missing mine………LOL.

[VisorBoy]

She checks all the…..boxes……

Biden’s new press secretary sparks conflict-of-interest concerns over relationship with CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux

https://nypost.com/2022/05/06/bidens-ne ... -concerns/

Once again, you mention the race of an appointee as the reason for appointment. You've now done it on 2 occasions. Yet on a separate occasion, when a judge was, by most objective measures, unqualified to sit on the federal bench, you don't mention race at all, nor do you question credentials. But in these two instances, you do. Hmm, what do they have in common, I wonder...

You’re in the Party that is OBSESSED with race.

I’m pointing out the fact that she checks at least three intersectional boxes…….

You should be happy……….

Yes, you pointed out her race. That's exactly my point.

And you’re missing mine………LOL.

Not responding to your point is not the same thing as misunderstanding it.

[RiverguyVT]

Not responding to your point is not the same thing as misunderstanding it.

Perhaps, perhaps not.
But it is taking a position based on .....feelings.

[HokieHam]

Not responding to your point is not the same thing as misunderstanding it.

Perhaps, perhaps not.
But it is taking a position based on .....feelings.

VB just doesn’t get certain…..things……like exposing what his Party does, 24-7.

[133743Hokie]

She checks all the…..boxes……

Biden’s new press secretary sparks conflict-of-interest concerns over relationship with CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux

https://nypost.com/2022/05/06/bidens-ne ... -concerns/

Once again, you mention the race of an appointee as the reason for appointment. You've now done it on 2 occasions. Yet on a separate occasion, when a judge was, by most objective measures, unqualified to sit on the federal bench, you don't mention race at all, nor do you question credentials. But in these two instances, you do. Hmm, what do they have in common, I wonder...

Are you referring to Sotomayor?

[HokieHam]

Hilarious the montage I JUST heard from all the MoT broadcast stations.

“First black person AND lgbtqP123xyz person as Press Secretary”.

THAT IS THE FOCUS.

[RiverguyVT]

Two questions:

1- Why does Ham hate French-Martinique people?

2- Does Visor write for HuffPo?

[RiverguyVT]

only because HuffPo sent me there... I went to the YouTube of Tucker Carlson's bit that so enraged HuffPo.

(as linking this is sure to upset some here... tUcKeR cArLsOn~!__)

Spoiler: Carlson wasn't racist in this bit.

[HokieHam]

only because HuffPo sent me there... I went to the YouTube of Tucker Carlson's bit that so enraged HuffPo.

(as linking this is sure to upset some here... tUcKeR cArLsOn~!__)

Spoiler: Carlson wasn't racist in this bit.

LOL……the media montage at 3:30 or so is even better than the one I heard.

This woman sees racism EVERYWHERE……. She’s the perfect pick for these loons.

[HokieHam]

[RiverguyVT]

Wow. LOL (well, if it wasn't such a reflection of where we are it'd be funny)
Where are the people that will frame this moment, and suggest she is at all competent?

[HokieJoe]

The pot on her truth knob sounds a very scratchy. Time to replace it.

[HokieHam]

She’s horrible….but if we say that….we’re raAAaAAAaaCiS!

Even With The Media Tossing Her Softballs, Biden Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre Can’t Get The Bat Off Her Shoulder

https://thefederalist.com/2022/06/15/e ... -shoulder/

[HokieHam]

Well, I know who IS stupid…..

IMMIGRATIONBorder Patrol Agents: White House Press Secretary Is Either “Extremely dumb Or Flat-out Lying” About Migrant Crisis
She “hopes America is so stupid we would believe her”

https://summit.news/2022/09/01/border- ... nt-crisis/

[HokieHam]

[RiverguyVT]

That's a lot of jobs.

[HokieHam]

Diversity hire…..period.

'Maybe Europe could just get their energy cheaper from Nordstrom Rack?' Karine Jean-Pierre is mocked for calling Russian pipeline 'Nordstrom 1' during off-the-rails press briefing
White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre accidentally called Russia's Nord Stream 1 pipeline 'Nordstrom 1'
A clip of her mistake was shared on social media as some users mocked her
Nordstrom is a department store chain, as many pointed out following the comment
Fox Radio host Jimmy Failla tweeted about the blunder: 'Not sure what's worse, that Karine Jean Pierre just called it The NORDSTROM Pipeline, or that Biden yelled at his TV, 'no dummy it's Bloomingdales''
The blunder by President Biden's press secretary came during Monday's briefing about the shutdown of the main gas pipeline - Nord Stream 1

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic ... rom-1.html