InfoWars guy at it again.
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
InfoWars guy at it again.
This is the same guy some of y’all quote from
Time to time.
https://www.newsweek.com/alex-jones-fea ... te-1790448
Time to time.
https://www.newsweek.com/alex-jones-fea ... te-1790448
- Major Kong
- Posts: 15765
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:35 pm
- Alma Mater: Ferrum VT ASU
- Party: Independent
- Location: Somewhere between Marion and Seven Mile Ford
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
Meh I didn't even know he was still around. I thought he was hiding under a deep, dark, dank sewage pile somewhere.
I only post using 100% recycled electrons.
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
hokie80 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 10:18 pm This is the same guy some of y’all quote from
Time to time.
https://www.newsweek.com/alex-jones-fea ... te-1790448
Who is y'all, precisely?
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
- HokieHam
- Posts: 26682
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
- Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
It’s hilarious.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Thu Mar 30, 2023 6:57 pmhokie80 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 10:18 pm This is the same guy some of y’all quote from
Time to time.
https://www.newsweek.com/alex-jones-fea ... te-1790448
Who is y'all, precisely?
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."
ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
What’s hilarious is that you never call out those who do post from InfoWars.
Do the search. You’ll find them.
Or continue to ignore. Doesn’t matter to me since I’m
Right about this.
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
What's hilarious is that you make sh!t up to prove a point. I don’t know or care who posts from infowars. That's your major malfunction.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
I’m not making anything up.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Thu Mar 30, 2023 8:11 pm
What's hilarious is that you make sh!t up to prove a point. I don’t know or care who posts from infowars. That's your major malfunction.
InfoWars has been linked here numerous times.
My guess is perhaps you are one of those folks (although I can’t confirm that for a fact). But it has been linked here by posters on this board.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
The only posters I've found that linked to InfoWars are RGVT, HokieJoe, ip, and hokie80.
-
- Posts: 3074
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
viewtopic.php?p=323766#p323766HokieJoe wrote: ↑Thu Mar 30, 2023 6:57 pmhokie80 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 10:18 pm This is the same guy some of y’all quote from
Time to time.
https://www.newsweek.com/alex-jones-fea ... te-1790448
Who is y'all, precisely?
viewtopic.php?p=313411#p313411
viewtopic.php?p=202785#p202785
viewtopic.php?p=164952#p164952
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
And when I’ve linked it it’s to point out the level of lunch from that site and him.HokieFanDC wrote: ↑Thu Mar 30, 2023 9:47 pmThe only posters I've found that linked to InfoWars are RGVT, HokieJoe, ip, and hokie80.
Unlike others that use it as source material.
- HokieHam
- Posts: 26682
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
- Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
As I said, hilarious. Not as hilarious as ip’s rage thread, but still hilarious,
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."
ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
hokie80 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 30, 2023 9:40 pmI’m not making anything up.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Thu Mar 30, 2023 8:11 pm
What's hilarious is that you make sh!t up to prove a point. I don’t know or care who posts from infowars. That's your major malfunction.
InfoWars has been linked here numerous times.
My guess is perhaps you are one of those folks (although I can’t confirm that for a fact). But it has been linked here by posters on this board.
So has Yahoo nEwS and Media Matters. I'm sure they're both NeWsGuArD cErtiFiEd.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
Yahoo is a consolidator of numerous news sources. Hell, they even post stuff from Fox. Your serial liar network.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:14 amhokie80 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 30, 2023 9:40 pmI’m not making anything up.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Thu Mar 30, 2023 8:11 pm
What's hilarious is that you make sh!t up to prove a point. I don’t know or care who posts from infowars. That's your major malfunction.
InfoWars has been linked here numerous times.
My guess is perhaps you are one of those folks (although I can’t confirm that for a fact). But it has been linked here by posters on this board.
So has Yahoo nEwS and Media Matters. I'm sure they're both NeWsGuArD cErtiFiEd.
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
No sh!t, Batman. Yahoo curates their news just like Google News. Very truth stuff. NeWsGuArD cErtTifiEd.hokie80 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:17 amYahoo is a consolidator of numerous news sources. Hell, they even post stuff from Fox. Your serial liar network.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:14 amhokie80 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 30, 2023 9:40 pmI’m not making anything up.
InfoWars has been linked here numerous times.
My guess is perhaps you are one of those folks (although I can’t confirm that for a fact). But it has been linked here by posters on this board.
So has Yahoo nEwS and Media Matters. I'm sure they're both NeWsGuArD cErtiFiEd.
I don't watch FNC. I get it though, you're lost without your boogeymen.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
The correct response (for those being objective) is that Alex Nones and InfoWars are a danger and a joke.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:32 amNo sh!t, Batman. Yahoo curates their news just like Google News. Very truth stuff. NeWsGuArD cErtTifiEd.hokie80 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:17 amYahoo is a consolidator of numerous news sources. Hell, they even post stuff from Fox. Your serial liar network.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:14 amhokie80 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 30, 2023 9:40 pmI’m not making anything up.
InfoWars has been linked here numerous times.
My guess is perhaps you are one of those folks (although I can’t confirm that for a fact). But it has been linked here by posters on this board.
So has Yahoo nEwS and Media Matters. I'm sure they're both NeWsGuArD cErtiFiEd.
I don't watch FNC. I get it though, you're lost without your boogeymen.
You’re welcome.
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
hokie80 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:34 amThe correct response (for those being objective) is that Alex Nones and InfoWars are a danger and a joke.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:32 amNo sh!t, Batman. Yahoo curates their news just like Google News. Very truth stuff. NeWsGuArD cErtTifiEd.hokie80 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:17 amYahoo is a consolidator of numerous news sources. Hell, they even post stuff from Fox. Your serial liar network.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:14 am
So has Yahoo nEwS and Media Matters. I'm sure they're both NeWsGuArD cErtiFiEd.
I don't watch FNC. I get it though, you're lost without your boogeymen.
You’re welcome.
A joke, yes. A danger, no. Either way, they still are protected by the First Amendment.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
A danger, yes.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 1:25 amhokie80 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:34 amThe correct response (for those being objective) is that Alex Nones and InfoWars are a danger and a joke.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:32 amNo sh!t, Batman. Yahoo curates their news just like Google News. Very truth stuff. NeWsGuArD cErtTifiEd.
I don't watch FNC. I get it though, you're lost without your boogeymen.
You’re welcome.
A joke, yes. A danger, no. Either way, they still are protected by the First Amendment.
Kudos defending him.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
Yes, a danger. He purposefully harmed the families of the Sandy Hook victims.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 1:25 amhokie80 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:34 amThe correct response (for those being objective) is that Alex Nones and InfoWars are a danger and a joke.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:32 amNo sh!t, Batman. Yahoo curates their news just like Google News. Very truth stuff. NeWsGuArD cErtTifiEd.
I don't watch FNC. I get it though, you're lost without your boogeymen.
You’re welcome.
A joke, yes. A danger, no. Either way, they still are protected by the First Amendment.
He's an evil POS. And what he did to them was not protected by the first amendment.
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
hokie80 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 2:16 amA danger, yes.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 1:25 amhokie80 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:34 amThe correct response (for those being objective) is that Alex Nones and InfoWars are a danger and a joke.
You’re welcome.
A joke, yes. A danger, no. Either way, they still are protected by the First Amendment.
Kudos defending him.
I'm not defending him. Just stating facts. In terms of free speech issues, you're no better than gun grabbers. That's you're issue, not mine.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
To the extent that he libeled or slandered people yes. Otherwise, no. Not dangerous. It's a stupid characterization.HokieFanDC wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 3:48 amYes, a danger. He purposefully harmed the families of the Sandy Hook victims.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 1:25 amhokie80 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:34 amThe correct response (for those being objective) is that Alex Nones and InfoWars are a danger and a joke.
You’re welcome.
A joke, yes. A danger, no. Either way, they still are protected by the First Amendment.
He's an evil POS. And what he did to them was not protected by the first amendment.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
Cultists are dangerous. And he is a cultist.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 3:54 pmTo the extent that he libeled or slandered people yes. Otherwise, no. Not dangerous. It's a stupid characterization.HokieFanDC wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 3:48 amYes, a danger. He purposefully harmed the families of the Sandy Hook victims.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 1:25 amhokie80 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:34 amThe correct response (for those being objective) is that Alex Nones and InfoWars are a danger and a joke.
You’re welcome.
A joke, yes. A danger, no. Either way, they still are protected by the First Amendment.
He's an evil POS. And what he did to them was not protected by the first amendment.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/14/alex-jo ... ories.html
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
hokie80 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 4:55 pmCultists are dangerous. And he is a cultist.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 3:54 pmTo the extent that he libeled or slandered people yes. Otherwise, no. Not dangerous. It's a stupid characterization.HokieFanDC wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 3:48 amYes, a danger. He purposefully harmed the families of the Sandy Hook victims.
He's an evil POS. And what he did to them was not protected by the first amendment.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/14/alex-jo ... ories.html
Cultist? Cripes almighty. You sound like a moldy 80 year old woman. Speech is vewy swkewwee. Change the channel cancel culture boy.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
His audience buying his conspiracy bull crap are the very definition of cultists.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 8:07 pmhokie80 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 4:55 pmCultists are dangerous. And he is a cultist.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 3:54 pmTo the extent that he libeled or slandered people yes. Otherwise, no. Not dangerous. It's a stupid characterization.HokieFanDC wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 3:48 amYes, a danger. He purposefully harmed the families of the Sandy Hook victims.
He's an evil POS. And what he did to them was not protected by the first amendment.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/14/alex-jo ... ories.html
Cultist? Cripes almighty. You sound like a moldy 80 year old woman. Speech is vewy swkewwee. Change the channel cancel culture boy.
“Cult leaders must be dynamic, charismatic, and convincing because their goal is to brainwash their members and acquire monetary or power-related advantages. These characteristics are crucial because a cult leader needs his members to adhere to his teachings and doctrines strictly and strongly to eliminate any doubt concerning the usually ridiculous beliefs strictly.”
https://study.com/learn/lesson/cult-lea ... aders.html
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
hokie80 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 8:13 pmHis audience buying his conspiracy bull crap are the very definition of cultists.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 8:07 pmhokie80 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 4:55 pmCultists are dangerous. And he is a cultist.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 3:54 pmTo the extent that he libeled or slandered people yes. Otherwise, no. Not dangerous. It's a stupid characterization.HokieFanDC wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 3:48 amYes, a danger. He purposefully harmed the families of the Sandy Hook victims.
He's an evil POS. And what he did to them was not protected by the first amendment.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/14/alex-jo ... ories.html
Cultist? Cripes almighty. You sound like a moldy 80 year old woman. Speech is vewy swkewwee. Change the channel cancel culture boy.
“Cult leaders must be dynamic, charismatic, and convincing because their goal is to brainwash their members and acquire monetary or power-related advantages. These characteristics are crucial because a cult leader needs his members to adhere to his teachings and doctrines strictly and strongly to eliminate any doubt concerning the usually ridiculous beliefs strictly.”
https://study.com/learn/lesson/cult-lea ... aders.html
Look everyone, CatLady80 has posted a link to a position he pulled out of his rear from someone else who pulled the same assertion out of their rear!
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
Re: InfoWars guy at it again.
Look …. Joe doesn’t like facts.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 8:26 pmhokie80 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 8:13 pmHis audience buying his conspiracy bull crap are the very definition of cultists.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 8:07 pmhokie80 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 4:55 pmCultists are dangerous. And he is a cultist.HokieJoe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 3:54 pmTo the extent that he libeled or slandered people yes. Otherwise, no. Not dangerous. It's a stupid characterization.HokieFanDC wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 3:48 am
Yes, a danger. He purposefully harmed the families of the Sandy Hook victims.
He's an evil POS. And what he did to them was not protected by the first amendment.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/14/alex-jo ... ories.html
Cultist? Cripes almighty. You sound like a moldy 80 year old woman. Speech is vewy swkewwee. Change the channel cancel culture boy.
“Cult leaders must be dynamic, charismatic, and convincing because their goal is to brainwash their members and acquire monetary or power-related advantages. These characteristics are crucial because a cult leader needs his members to adhere to his teachings and doctrines strictly and strongly to eliminate any doubt concerning the usually ridiculous beliefs strictly.”
https://study.com/learn/lesson/cult-lea ... aders.html
Look everyone, CatLady80 has posted a link to a position he pulled out of his rear from someone else who pulled the same assertion out of their rear!