InfoWars guy at it again.

[hokie80]

This is the same guy some of y’all quote from
Time to time.

https://www.newsweek.com/alex-jones-fea ... te-1790448

[Major Kong]

Meh I didn't even know he was still around. I thought he was hiding under a deep, dark, dank sewage pile somewhere.

[HokieJoe]

This is the same guy some of y’all quote from
Time to time.

https://www.newsweek.com/alex-jones-fea ... te-1790448

Who is y'all, precisely?

[HokieHam]

This is the same guy some of y’all quote from
Time to time.

https://www.newsweek.com/alex-jones-fea ... te-1790448

Who is y'all, precisely?

It’s hilarious.

[hokie80]

This is the same guy some of y’all quote from
Time to time.

https://www.newsweek.com/alex-jones-fea ... te-1790448

Who is y'all, precisely?

It’s hilarious.

What’s hilarious is that you never call out those who do post from InfoWars.

Do the search. You’ll find them.

Or continue to ignore. Doesn’t matter to me since I’m
Right about this.

[HokieJoe]

This is the same guy some of y’all quote from
Time to time.

https://www.newsweek.com/alex-jones-fea ... te-1790448

Who is y'all, precisely?

It’s hilarious.

What’s hilarious is that you never call out those who do post from InfoWars.

Do the search. You’ll find them.

Or continue to ignore. Doesn’t matter to me since I’m
Right about this.

What's hilarious is that you make sh!t up to prove a point. I don’t know or care who posts from infowars. That's your major malfunction.

[hokie80]

This is the same guy some of y’all quote from
Time to time.

https://www.newsweek.com/alex-jones-fea ... te-1790448

Who is y'all, precisely?

It’s hilarious.

What’s hilarious is that you never call out those who do post from InfoWars.

Do the search. You’ll find them.

Or continue to ignore. Doesn’t matter to me since I’m
Right about this.

What's hilarious is that you make sh!t up to prove a point. I don’t know or care who posts from infowars. That's your major malfunction.

I’m not making anything up.

InfoWars has been linked here numerous times.

My guess is perhaps you are one of those folks (although I can’t confirm that for a fact). But it has been linked here by posters on this board.

[HokieFanDC]

This is the same guy some of y’all quote from
Time to time.

https://www.newsweek.com/alex-jones-fea ... te-1790448

Who is y'all, precisely?

It’s hilarious.

What’s hilarious is that you never call out those who do post from InfoWars.

Do the search. You’ll find them.

Or continue to ignore. Doesn’t matter to me since I’m
Right about this.

The only posters I've found that linked to InfoWars are RGVT, HokieJoe, ip, and hokie80.

[HvilleHokie]

This is the same guy some of y’all quote from
Time to time.

https://www.newsweek.com/alex-jones-fea ... te-1790448

Who is y'all, precisely?

viewtopic.php?p=323766#p323766

viewtopic.php?p=313411#p313411

viewtopic.php?p=202785#p202785

viewtopic.php?p=164952#p164952

[hokie80]

This is the same guy some of y’all quote from
Time to time.

https://www.newsweek.com/alex-jones-fea ... te-1790448

Who is y'all, precisely?

It’s hilarious.

What’s hilarious is that you never call out those who do post from InfoWars.

Do the search. You’ll find them.

Or continue to ignore. Doesn’t matter to me since I’m
Right about this.

The only posters I've found that linked to InfoWars are RGVT, HokieJoe, ip, and hokie80.

And when I’ve linked it it’s to point out the level of lunch from that site and him.

Unlike others that use it as source material.

[HokieHam]

This is the same guy some of y’all quote from
Time to time.

https://www.newsweek.com/alex-jones-fea ... te-1790448

Who is y'all, precisely?

It’s hilarious.

What’s hilarious is that you never call out those who do post from InfoWars.

Do the search. You’ll find them.

Or continue to ignore. Doesn’t matter to me since I’m
Right about this.

As I said, hilarious. Not as hilarious as ip’s rage thread, but still hilarious,

[HokieJoe]

This is the same guy some of y’all quote from
Time to time.

https://www.newsweek.com/alex-jones-fea ... te-1790448

Who is y'all, precisely?

It’s hilarious.

What’s hilarious is that you never call out those who do post from InfoWars.

Do the search. You’ll find them.

Or continue to ignore. Doesn’t matter to me since I’m
Right about this.

What's hilarious is that you make sh!t up to prove a point. I don’t know or care who posts from infowars. That's your major malfunction.

I’m not making anything up.

InfoWars has been linked here numerous times.

My guess is perhaps you are one of those folks (although I can’t confirm that for a fact). But it has been linked here by posters on this board.

So has Yahoo nEwS and Media Matters. I'm sure they're both NeWsGuArD cErtiFiEd.

[hokie80]

Who is y'all, precisely?

It’s hilarious.

What’s hilarious is that you never call out those who do post from InfoWars.

Do the search. You’ll find them.

Or continue to ignore. Doesn’t matter to me since I’m
Right about this.

What's hilarious is that you make sh!t up to prove a point. I don’t know or care who posts from infowars. That's your major malfunction.

I’m not making anything up.

InfoWars has been linked here numerous times.

My guess is perhaps you are one of those folks (although I can’t confirm that for a fact). But it has been linked here by posters on this board.

So has Yahoo nEwS and Media Matters. I'm sure they're both NeWsGuArD cErtiFiEd.

Yahoo is a consolidator of numerous news sources. Hell, they even post stuff from Fox. Your serial liar network.

[HokieJoe]

It’s hilarious.

What’s hilarious is that you never call out those who do post from InfoWars.

Do the search. You’ll find them.

Or continue to ignore. Doesn’t matter to me since I’m
Right about this.

What's hilarious is that you make sh!t up to prove a point. I don’t know or care who posts from infowars. That's your major malfunction.

I’m not making anything up.

InfoWars has been linked here numerous times.

My guess is perhaps you are one of those folks (although I can’t confirm that for a fact). But it has been linked here by posters on this board.

So has Yahoo nEwS and Media Matters. I'm sure they're both NeWsGuArD cErtiFiEd.

Yahoo is a consolidator of numerous news sources. Hell, they even post stuff from Fox. Your serial liar network.

No sh!t, Batman. Yahoo curates their news just like Google News. Very truth stuff. NeWsGuArD cErtTifiEd.

I don't watch FNC. I get it though, you're lost without your boogeymen.

[hokie80]

What’s hilarious is that you never call out those who do post from InfoWars.

Do the search. You’ll find them.

Or continue to ignore. Doesn’t matter to me since I’m
Right about this.

What's hilarious is that you make sh!t up to prove a point. I don’t know or care who posts from infowars. That's your major malfunction.

I’m not making anything up.

InfoWars has been linked here numerous times.

My guess is perhaps you are one of those folks (although I can’t confirm that for a fact). But it has been linked here by posters on this board.

So has Yahoo nEwS and Media Matters. I'm sure they're both NeWsGuArD cErtiFiEd.

Yahoo is a consolidator of numerous news sources. Hell, they even post stuff from Fox. Your serial liar network.

No sh!t, Batman. Yahoo curates their news just like Google News. Very truth stuff. NeWsGuArD cErtTifiEd.

I don't watch FNC. I get it though, you're lost without your boogeymen.

The correct response (for those being objective) is that Alex Nones and InfoWars are a danger and a joke.

You’re welcome.

[HokieJoe]

What's hilarious is that you make sh!t up to prove a point. I don’t know or care who posts from infowars. That's your major malfunction.

I’m not making anything up.

InfoWars has been linked here numerous times.

My guess is perhaps you are one of those folks (although I can’t confirm that for a fact). But it has been linked here by posters on this board.

So has Yahoo nEwS and Media Matters. I'm sure they're both NeWsGuArD cErtiFiEd.

Yahoo is a consolidator of numerous news sources. Hell, they even post stuff from Fox. Your serial liar network.

No sh!t, Batman. Yahoo curates their news just like Google News. Very truth stuff. NeWsGuArD cErtTifiEd.

I don't watch FNC. I get it though, you're lost without your boogeymen.

The correct response (for those being objective) is that Alex Nones and InfoWars are a danger and a joke.

You’re welcome.

A joke, yes. A danger, no. Either way, they still are protected by the First Amendment.

[hokie80]

I’m not making anything up.

InfoWars has been linked here numerous times.

My guess is perhaps you are one of those folks (although I can’t confirm that for a fact). But it has been linked here by posters on this board.

So has Yahoo nEwS and Media Matters. I'm sure they're both NeWsGuArD cErtiFiEd.

Yahoo is a consolidator of numerous news sources. Hell, they even post stuff from Fox. Your serial liar network.

No sh!t, Batman. Yahoo curates their news just like Google News. Very truth stuff. NeWsGuArD cErtTifiEd.

I don't watch FNC. I get it though, you're lost without your boogeymen.

The correct response (for those being objective) is that Alex Nones and InfoWars are a danger and a joke.

You’re welcome.

A joke, yes. A danger, no. Either way, they still are protected by the First Amendment.

A danger, yes.

Kudos defending him.

[HokieFanDC]

I’m not making anything up.

InfoWars has been linked here numerous times.

My guess is perhaps you are one of those folks (although I can’t confirm that for a fact). But it has been linked here by posters on this board.

So has Yahoo nEwS and Media Matters. I'm sure they're both NeWsGuArD cErtiFiEd.

Yahoo is a consolidator of numerous news sources. Hell, they even post stuff from Fox. Your serial liar network.

No sh!t, Batman. Yahoo curates their news just like Google News. Very truth stuff. NeWsGuArD cErtTifiEd.

I don't watch FNC. I get it though, you're lost without your boogeymen.

The correct response (for those being objective) is that Alex Nones and InfoWars are a danger and a joke.

You’re welcome.

A joke, yes. A danger, no. Either way, they still are protected by the First Amendment.

Yes, a danger. He purposefully harmed the families of the Sandy Hook victims.
He's an evil POS. And what he did to them was not protected by the first amendment.

[HokieJoe]

So has Yahoo nEwS and Media Matters. I'm sure they're both NeWsGuArD cErtiFiEd.

Yahoo is a consolidator of numerous news sources. Hell, they even post stuff from Fox. Your serial liar network.

No sh!t, Batman. Yahoo curates their news just like Google News. Very truth stuff. NeWsGuArD cErtTifiEd.

I don't watch FNC. I get it though, you're lost without your boogeymen.

The correct response (for those being objective) is that Alex Nones and InfoWars are a danger and a joke.

You’re welcome.

A joke, yes. A danger, no. Either way, they still are protected by the First Amendment.

A danger, yes.

Kudos defending him.

I'm not defending him. Just stating facts. In terms of free speech issues, you're no better than gun grabbers. That's you're issue, not mine.

[HokieJoe]

So has Yahoo nEwS and Media Matters. I'm sure they're both NeWsGuArD cErtiFiEd.

Yahoo is a consolidator of numerous news sources. Hell, they even post stuff from Fox. Your serial liar network.

No sh!t, Batman. Yahoo curates their news just like Google News. Very truth stuff. NeWsGuArD cErtTifiEd.

I don't watch FNC. I get it though, you're lost without your boogeymen.

The correct response (for those being objective) is that Alex Nones and InfoWars are a danger and a joke.

You’re welcome.

A joke, yes. A danger, no. Either way, they still are protected by the First Amendment.

Yes, a danger. He purposefully harmed the families of the Sandy Hook victims.
He's an evil POS. And what he did to them was not protected by the first amendment.

To the extent that he libeled or slandered people yes. Otherwise, no. Not dangerous. It's a stupid characterization.

[hokie80]

Yahoo is a consolidator of numerous news sources. Hell, they even post stuff from Fox. Your serial liar network.

No sh!t, Batman. Yahoo curates their news just like Google News. Very truth stuff. NeWsGuArD cErtTifiEd.

I don't watch FNC. I get it though, you're lost without your boogeymen.

The correct response (for those being objective) is that Alex Nones and InfoWars are a danger and a joke.

You’re welcome.

A joke, yes. A danger, no. Either way, they still are protected by the First Amendment.

Yes, a danger. He purposefully harmed the families of the Sandy Hook victims.
He's an evil POS. And what he did to them was not protected by the first amendment.

To the extent that he libeled or slandered people yes. Otherwise, no. Not dangerous. It's a stupid characterization.

Cultists are dangerous. And he is a cultist.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/14/alex-jo ... ories.html

[HokieJoe]

No sh!t, Batman. Yahoo curates their news just like Google News. Very truth stuff. NeWsGuArD cErtTifiEd.

I don't watch FNC. I get it though, you're lost without your boogeymen.

The correct response (for those being objective) is that Alex Nones and InfoWars are a danger and a joke.

You’re welcome.

A joke, yes. A danger, no. Either way, they still are protected by the First Amendment.

Yes, a danger. He purposefully harmed the families of the Sandy Hook victims.
He's an evil POS. And what he did to them was not protected by the first amendment.

To the extent that he libeled or slandered people yes. Otherwise, no. Not dangerous. It's a stupid characterization.

Cultists are dangerous. And he is a cultist.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/14/alex-jo ... ories.html

Cultist? Cripes almighty. You sound like a moldy 80 year old woman. Speech is vewy swkewwee. Change the channel cancel culture boy.

[hokie80]

The correct response (for those being objective) is that Alex Nones and InfoWars are a danger and a joke.

You’re welcome.

A joke, yes. A danger, no. Either way, they still are protected by the First Amendment.

Yes, a danger. He purposefully harmed the families of the Sandy Hook victims.
He's an evil POS. And what he did to them was not protected by the first amendment.

To the extent that he libeled or slandered people yes. Otherwise, no. Not dangerous. It's a stupid characterization.

Cultists are dangerous. And he is a cultist.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/14/alex-jo ... ories.html

Cultist? Cripes almighty. You sound like a moldy 80 year old woman. Speech is vewy swkewwee. Change the channel cancel culture boy.

His audience buying his conspiracy bull crap are the very definition of cultists.

“Cult leaders must be dynamic, charismatic, and convincing because their goal is to brainwash their members and acquire monetary or power-related advantages. These characteristics are crucial because a cult leader needs his members to adhere to his teachings and doctrines strictly and strongly to eliminate any doubt concerning the usually ridiculous beliefs strictly.”

https://study.com/learn/lesson/cult-lea ... aders.html

[HokieJoe]

A joke, yes. A danger, no. Either way, they still are protected by the First Amendment.

Yes, a danger. He purposefully harmed the families of the Sandy Hook victims.
He's an evil POS. And what he did to them was not protected by the first amendment.

To the extent that he libeled or slandered people yes. Otherwise, no. Not dangerous. It's a stupid characterization.

Cultists are dangerous. And he is a cultist.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/14/alex-jo ... ories.html

Cultist? Cripes almighty. You sound like a moldy 80 year old woman. Speech is vewy swkewwee. Change the channel cancel culture boy.

His audience buying his conspiracy bull crap are the very definition of cultists.

“Cult leaders must be dynamic, charismatic, and convincing because their goal is to brainwash their members and acquire monetary or power-related advantages. These characteristics are crucial because a cult leader needs his members to adhere to his teachings and doctrines strictly and strongly to eliminate any doubt concerning the usually ridiculous beliefs strictly.”

https://study.com/learn/lesson/cult-lea ... aders.html

Look everyone, CatLady80 has posted a link to a position he pulled out of his rear from someone else who pulled the same assertion out of their rear!

[hokie80]

Yes, a danger. He purposefully harmed the families of the Sandy Hook victims.
He's an evil POS. And what he did to them was not protected by the first amendment.

To the extent that he libeled or slandered people yes. Otherwise, no. Not dangerous. It's a stupid characterization.

Cultists are dangerous. And he is a cultist.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/14/alex-jo ... ories.html

Cultist? Cripes almighty. You sound like a moldy 80 year old woman. Speech is vewy swkewwee. Change the channel cancel culture boy.

His audience buying his conspiracy bull crap are the very definition of cultists.

“Cult leaders must be dynamic, charismatic, and convincing because their goal is to brainwash their members and acquire monetary or power-related advantages. These characteristics are crucial because a cult leader needs his members to adhere to his teachings and doctrines strictly and strongly to eliminate any doubt concerning the usually ridiculous beliefs strictly.”

https://study.com/learn/lesson/cult-lea ... aders.html

Look everyone, CatLady80 has posted a link to a position he pulled out of his rear from someone else who pulled the same assertion out of their rear!

Look …. Joe doesn’t like facts.