Parents don't have right to send unvaccinated kids to school

[nolanvt]

The idea is to keep the kids away who can easily transmit communicable diseases. But it's actually not even limited to diseases. They'll send your kid home if the nurse notices they have lice.

Yup. I don't see the AIDS analogy as being valid here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SuwaneeTim820]

You can't get AIDS from someone by sitting behind them in class or standing close to them in the lunch line.

"You can get it from tears though, right?" - Bill Frist

[awesome guy]

The idea is to keep the kids away who can easily transmit communicable diseases. But it's actually not even limited to diseases. They'll send your kid home if the nurse notices they have lice.

Yup. I don't see the AIDS analogy as being valid here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Because the homosexual mafia has brainwashed you and you think it's no worse than a cold.

[nolanvt]

The idea is to keep the kids away who can easily transmit communicable diseases. But it's actually not even limited to diseases. They'll send your kid home if the nurse notices they have lice.

Yup. I don't see the AIDS analogy as being valid here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Because the homosexual mafia has brainwashed you and you think it's no worse than a cold.

It is worse than "a cold", but that's not what's being discussed here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[awesome guy]

The idea is to keep the kids away who can easily transmit communicable diseases. But it's actually not even limited to diseases. They'll send your kid home if the nurse notices they have lice.

Yup. I don't see the AIDS analogy as being valid here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Because the homosexual mafia has brainwashed you and you think it's no worse than a cold.

It is worse than "a cold", but that's not what's being discussed here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Un huh

[hokie80]

The idea is to keep the kids away who can easily transmit communicable diseases. But it's actually not even limited to diseases. They'll send your kid home if the nurse notices they have lice.

Yup. I don't see the AIDS analogy as being valid here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Because the homosexual mafia has brainwashed you and you think it's no worse than a cold.

It is worse than "a cold", but that's not what's being discussed here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Un huh

You really have a boner for this whole gay thing, don't you? (see what I did there)

[awesome guy]

The idea is to keep the kids away who can easily transmit communicable diseases. But it's actually not even limited to diseases. They'll send your kid home if the nurse notices they have lice.

Yup. I don't see the AIDS analogy as being valid here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Because the homosexual mafia has brainwashed you and you think it's no worse than a cold.

It is worse than "a cold", but that's not what's being discussed here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Un huh

You really have a boner for this whole gay thing, don't you? (see what I did there)

It's just morning wood.

[hokie80]

The idea is to keep the kids away who can easily transmit communicable diseases. But it's actually not even limited to diseases. They'll send your kid home if the nurse notices they have lice.

Yup. I don't see the AIDS analogy as being valid here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Because the homosexual mafia has brainwashed you and you think it's no worse than a cold.

It is worse than "a cold", but that's not what's being discussed here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Un huh

In the mid-80's when the whole AIDS thing hit and among all the fear and uncertainty about how easily it may be transmitted, I did some volunteer works at a local AIDS hospice. I saw people wither away and die from the horrible disease that everyone was so scared of due to ignorance and bigotry. I saw human beings with a heart, brain and a soul suffer. Yes (before you say it) it was due to their own behavior. But my point is that we now understand it and how it is transmitted.

HIV/AIDS is not easily transmitted. THAT is simply a fact. It is less of a public concern than smallpox for example.

So it is worse than a cold. But it's not something that prevents an individual from attending school due to concerns over transmission. To even bring that up is beyond asinine. Sorry.

[awesome guy]

The idea is to keep the kids away who can easily transmit communicable diseases. But it's actually not even limited to diseases. They'll send your kid home if the nurse notices they have lice.

Yup. I don't see the AIDS analogy as being valid here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Because the homosexual mafia has brainwashed you and you think it's no worse than a cold.

It is worse than "a cold", but that's not what's being discussed here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Un huh

In the mid-80's when the whole AIDS thing hit and among all the fear and uncertainty about how easily it may be transmitted, I did some volunteer works at a local AIDS hospice. I saw people wither away and die from the horrible disease that everyone was so scared of due to ignorance and bigotry. I saw human beings with a heart, brain and a soul suffer. Yes (before you say it) it was due to their own behavior. But my point is that we now understand it and how it is transmitted.

HIV/AIDS is not easily transmitted. THAT is simply a fact. It is less of a public concern than smallpox for example.

So it is worse than a cold. But it's not something that prevents an individual from attending school due to concerns over transmission. To even bring that up is beyond asinine. Sorry.

Lol. More ghey misinformation. You guys are affraid of measles and laugh off AIDS. Unreal.

[hokie80]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

Un huh[/quote]

In the mid-80's when the whole AIDS thing hit and among all the fear and uncertainty about how easily it may be transmitted, I did some volunteer works at a local AIDS hospice. I saw people wither away and die from the horrible disease that everyone was so scared of due to ignorance and bigotry. I saw human beings with a heart, brain and a soul suffer. Yes (before you say it) it was due to their own behavior. But my point is that we now understand it and how it is transmitted.

HIV/AIDS is not easily transmitted. THAT is simply a fact. It is less of a public concern than smallpox for example.

So it is worse than a cold. But it's not something that prevents an individual from attending school due to concerns over transmission. To even bring that up is beyond asinine. Sorry.[/quote]

Lol. More ghey misinformation. You guys are affraid of measles and laugh off AIDS. Unreal.[/quote]

Suffice it to say you don't know what you are talking about.

It would be best you refrain from further comments less you make yourself more of a fool.

Seriously, your ignorance on this subject is mind boggling.

[awesome guy]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Un huh[/quote]

In the mid-80's when the whole AIDS thing hit and among all the fear and uncertainty about how easily it may be transmitted, I did some volunteer works at a local AIDS hospice. I saw people wither away and die from the horrible disease that everyone was so scared of due to ignorance and bigotry. I saw human beings with a heart, brain and a soul suffer. Yes (before you say it) it was due to their own behavior. But my point is that we now understand it and how it is transmitted.

HIV/AIDS is not easily transmitted. THAT is simply a fact. It is less of a public concern than smallpox for example.

So it is worse than a cold. But it's not something that prevents an individual from attending school due to concerns over transmission. To even bring that up is beyond asinine. Sorry.[/quote]

Lol. More ghey misinformation. You guys are affraid of measles and laugh off AIDS. Unreal.[/quote]

Suffice it to say you don't know what you are talking about.

It would be best you refrain from further comments less you make yourself more of a fool.

Seriously, your ignorance on this subject is mind boggling.[/quote]

Another riveting post. But it's hard to hear you up high on that horse. It's that or the pile of bullshit obstructing the message.

[hokie80]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Un huh

In the mid-80's when the whole AIDS thing hit and among all the fear and uncertainty about how easily it may be transmitted, I did some volunteer works at a local AIDS hospice. I saw people wither away and die from the horrible disease that everyone was so scared of due to ignorance and bigotry. I saw human beings with a heart, brain and a soul suffer. Yes (before you say it) it was due to their own behavior. But my point is that we now understand it and how it is transmitted.

HIV/AIDS is not easily transmitted. THAT is simply a fact. It is less of a public concern than smallpox for example.

So it is worse than a cold. But it's not something that prevents an individual from attending school due to concerns over transmission. To even bring that up is beyond asinine. Sorry.[/quote]

Lol. More ghey misinformation. You guys are affraid of measles and laugh off AIDS. Unreal.[/quote]

Suffice it to say you don't know what you are talking about.

It would be best you refrain from further comments less you make yourself more of a fool.

Seriously, your ignorance on this subject is mind boggling.[/quote]

Another riveting post. But it's hard to hear you up high on that horse. It's that or the pile of bullshit obstructing the message.[/quote]


Nope. I know the facts and don't respond based on bigotry...which is what you are doing.

Google legit medical sites on HIV. Or are you afraid the "ghey mafia" has infiltrated all of them just to allow kids with HIV to attend public schools and put the entire population at risk by attending?

Wow.

[Valencia Hokie]

Yes. They have a duty to keep kids safe when they go to public school. That includes keeping out kids that will put them at risk, which unvaccinated kids do.

Maybe I'm missing something. If the other kids are vaccinated, doesn't that protect them from contracting the various illnesses/diseases? Aren't the un-vaccinated kids the ones at risk?

[awesome guy]

Nope. I know the facts and don't respond based on bigotry...which is what you are doing.

Google legit medical sites on HIV. Or are you afraid the "ghey mafia" has infiltrated all of them just to allow kids with HIV to attend public schools and put the entire population at risk by attending?

Wow.

Thanks for proving my point. Idiocy like yours is why I used AIDS as an example. You're conformable forcing vaccinations on students, but are so crippled by political correctness as to not ban carriers of a contagious and deadly disease. Thus your whole position is you forcing your will on others, all from you personally agreeing with vaccinations and then hatefuly defending your sacred cow. Typical big government, nanny stater. You're inconsistent and random because you're emotional.

[Hokie5150]

Yes. They have a duty to keep kids safe when they go to public school. That includes keeping out kids that will put them at risk, which unvaccinated kids do.

Maybe I'm missing something. If the other kids are vaccinated, doesn't that protect them from contracting the various illnesses/diseases? Aren't the un-vaccinated kids the ones at risk?

Excellent question...

[hokie80]

Nope. I know the facts and don't respond based on bigotry...which is what you are doing.

Google legit medical sites on HIV. Or are you afraid the "ghey mafia" has infiltrated all of them just to allow kids with HIV to attend public schools and put the entire population at risk by attending?

Wow.

Thanks for proving my point. Idiocy like yours is why I used AIDS as an example. You're conformable forcing vaccinations on students, but are so crippled by political correctness as to not ban carriers of a contagious and deadly disease. Thus your whole position is you forcing your will on others, all from you personally agreeing with vaccinations and then hatefuly defending your sacred cow. Typical big government, nanny stater. You're inconsistent and random because you're emotional.

Oh the irony of you last sentence.

[Florida Hokie]

Nope. I know the facts and don't respond based on bigotry...which is what you are doing.

Google legit medical sites on HIV. Or are you afraid the "ghey mafia" has infiltrated all of them just to allow kids with HIV to attend public schools and put the entire population at risk by attending?

Wow.

Thanks for proving my point. Idiocy like yours is why I used AIDS as an example. You're conformable forcing vaccinations on students, but are so crippled by political correctness as to not ban carriers of a contagious and deadly disease. Thus your whole position is you forcing your will on others, all from you personally agreeing with vaccinations and then hatefuly defending your sacred cow. Typical big government, nanny stater. You're inconsistent and random because you're emotional.

Just for the record, AIDS is transmitted by the following:

Blood
Semen (cum)
Pre-seminal fluid (pre-cum)
Rectal fluids
Vaginal fluids
Breast milk

Measles, for example, are through droplet transmissions (sneezing, etc.)

Of the AIDS list, blood would be the most likely transmitter in a school environment. The others don't come into play. We can't use blood transmission as the standard in my opinion.

[awesome guy]

Nope. I know the facts and don't respond based on bigotry...which is what you are doing.

Google legit medical sites on HIV. Or are you afraid the "ghey mafia" has infiltrated all of them just to allow kids with HIV to attend public schools and put the entire population at risk by attending?

Wow.

Thanks for proving my point. Idiocy like yours is why I used AIDS as an example. You're conformable forcing vaccinations on students, but are so crippled by political correctness as to not ban carriers of a contagious and deadly disease. Thus your whole position is you forcing your will on others, all from you personally agreeing with vaccinations and then hatefuly defending your sacred cow. Typical big government, nanny stater. You're inconsistent and random because you're emotional.

Oh the irony of you last sentence.

There's no irony. I said many times to look at the broader context of a deadly disease, yet your hate kept bringing you back to the ghey, even accusing me of being hateful towards gays when I just mentioned a disease. And even more hilarious, questioning the ability to ban students over such issues. You on the other hand went straight into hatefuly proclaiming your love and compassion for queers, giving you the moral high ground to berate me. Let go of the hate within you.

[hokie80]

Nope. I know the facts and don't respond based on bigotry...which is what you are doing.

Google legit medical sites on HIV. Or are you afraid the "ghey mafia" has infiltrated all of them just to allow kids with HIV to attend public schools and put the entire population at risk by attending?

Wow.

Thanks for proving my point. Idiocy like yours is why I used AIDS as an example. You're conformable forcing vaccinations on students, but are so crippled by political correctness as to not ban carriers of a contagious and deadly disease. Thus your whole position is you forcing your will on others, all from you personally agreeing with vaccinations and then hatefuly defending your sacred cow. Typical big government, nanny stater. You're inconsistent and random because you're emotional.

Oh the irony of you last sentence.

There's no irony. I said many times to look at the broader context of a deadly disease, yet your hate kept bringing you back to the ghey, even accusing me of being hateful towards gays when I just mentioned a disease. And even more hilarious, questioning the ability to ban students over such issues. You on the other hand went straight into hatefuly proclaiming your love and compassion for queers, giving you the moral high ground to berate me. Let go of the hate within you.

You have a severe mental problem. Seek help. I can only hope that the psychologist you get is gay though.

Wow.

[awesome guy]

Nope. I know the facts and don't respond based on bigotry...which is what you are doing.

Google legit medical sites on HIV. Or are you afraid the "ghey mafia" has infiltrated all of them just to allow kids with HIV to attend public schools and put the entire population at risk by attending?

Wow.

Thanks for proving my point. Idiocy like yours is why I used AIDS as an example. You're conformable forcing vaccinations on students, but are so crippled by political correctness as to not ban carriers of a contagious and deadly disease. Thus your whole position is you forcing your will on others, all from you personally agreeing with vaccinations and then hatefuly defending your sacred cow. Typical big government, nanny stater. You're inconsistent and random because you're emotional.

Oh the irony of you last sentence.

There's no irony. I said many times to look at the broader context of a deadly disease, yet your hate kept bringing you back to the ghey, even accusing me of being hateful towards gays when I just mentioned a disease. And even more hilarious, questioning the ability to ban students over such issues. You on the other hand went straight into hatefuly proclaiming your love and compassion for queers, giving you the moral high ground to berate me. Let go of the hate within you.

You have a severe mental problem. Seek help. I can only hope that the psychologist you get is gay though.

Wow.

Oh the irony.

[hokie80]

Yes. They have a duty to keep kids safe when they go to public school. That includes keeping out kids that will put them at risk, which unvaccinated kids do.

Maybe I'm missing something. If the other kids are vaccinated, doesn't that protect them from contracting the various illnesses/diseases? Aren't the un-vaccinated kids the ones at risk?

Which is why they have that requirement. If they didn't (in theory) the school could fill with unvaccinated kids and create a huge health issue.

Bottom line - you don't introduce potential carriers of highly contagious diseases into an area of close contact (like a school).

[Uprising]

Yes. They have a duty to keep kids safe when they go to public school. That includes keeping out kids that will put them at risk, which unvaccinated kids do.

Maybe I'm missing something. If the other kids are vaccinated, doesn't that protect them from contracting the various illnesses/diseases? Aren't the un-vaccinated kids the ones at risk?

Few things on this:
-No vaccine is 100% effective but through herd immunity a community can all but eliminate diseases that have vaccines.
-I'm not up on the schedules but vaccines are scheduled throughout early childhood, including during school age. Right? So kids that haven't received all the doses because of their age would be exposed to greater risks.
-Perhaps most importantly, many children can't be vaccinated due to health issues (leukemia, cancer, heart problems, etc.). I'm assuming that the schools still allow these children to attend. They heavily rely on herd immunity to prevent them from contracting diseases that would likely be a death sentence to them.

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk

[awesome guy]

Yes. They have a duty to keep kids safe when they go to public school. That includes keeping out kids that will put them at risk, which unvaccinated kids do.

Maybe I'm missing something. If the other kids are vaccinated, doesn't that protect them from contracting the various illnesses/diseases? Aren't the un-vaccinated kids the ones at risk?

Which is why they have that requirement. If they didn't (in theory) the school could fill with unvaccinated kids and create a huge health issue.

Bottom line - you don't introduce potential carriers of highly contagious diseases into an area of close contact (like a school).

LOL, come on. You got check-mated.

[hokie80]

Yes. They have a duty to keep kids safe when they go to public school. That includes keeping out kids that will put them at risk, which unvaccinated kids do.

Maybe I'm missing something. If the other kids are vaccinated, doesn't that protect them from contracting the various illnesses/diseases? Aren't the un-vaccinated kids the ones at risk?

Which is why they have that requirement. If they didn't (in theory) the school could fill with unvaccinated kids and create a huge health issue.

Bottom line - you don't introduce potential carriers of highly contagious diseases into an area of close contact (like a school).

LOL, come on. You got check-mated.

Not really. But thanks for playing. Also, see uprising response.

Or perhaps we could just eliminate vax requirements for all and take our chances.

[awesome guy]

Yes. They have a duty to keep kids safe when they go to public school. That includes keeping out kids that will put them at risk, which unvaccinated kids do.

Maybe I'm missing something. If the other kids are vaccinated, doesn't that protect them from contracting the various illnesses/diseases? Aren't the un-vaccinated kids the ones at risk?

Which is why they have that requirement. If they didn't (in theory) the school could fill with unvaccinated kids and create a huge health issue.

Bottom line - you don't introduce potential carriers of highly contagious diseases into an area of close contact (like a school).

LOL, come on. You got check-mated.

Not really. But thanks for playing. Also, see uprising response.

Or perhaps we could just eliminate vax requirements for all and take our chances.

that's what it gets down to, a personal choice. The bottom line is your vaccinated kid isn't at risk from an unvaccinated kid. It's just nanny state. Uprisng's response dodged the issues and was as illogical as yours. Firstly, a kid who couldn't be vaccinated would not go to school either. The rule is no vaccination, no public school. Cause doesn't matter. And the rest is just silly. They'll encounter unvacinated people throughout their daily lives. Immunizations are completed by the time of school age. It gets down you wanting to tell others how to live their lives.