I was watching this, pleased that the coaches were confident, aggressive and demonstrating that they had faith in our defense.
Miami didn't want to try to score against our vaunted D. They wanted to go to the locker room tied.
Nope, we made they play.
I liked the decision.
....and I hoped we would hold them to a field goal. After all, they were about 85 yards away with about a minute left. Hold them to three points, defense.
Nothing wrong with the decision. The defense, when we needed them to step up, laid down.
Like they did later in the fourth quarter.
We stink.
Had we won, we would still stink, but not as bad.
The time outs at the end of the first half.
-
- Posts: 11324
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 8:48 pm
The time outs at the end of the first half.
If you bend over backwards long enough,
eventually you'll fall down.
eventually you'll fall down.
- Bay_area_Hokie
- Posts: 6033
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:53 am
- Alma Mater: VT
- Party: Surprise Party
Re: The time outs at the end of the first half.
Stink is being kind
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
“With God there are only individuals” - Philosopher Nicolas Gomez Davila
-
- Posts: 3676
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:05 pm
- Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
- Party: Like a Rock Star
Re: The time outs at the end of the first half.
Yet another example of why Bud Foster isn't the savior so many think he is. His defenses are getting worked regularly. (Cue the "he has no talent to work with" crowd)oaktonhokie wrote:I was watching this, pleased that the coaches were confident, aggressive and demonstrating that they had faith in our defense.
Miami didn't want to try to score against our vaunted D. They wanted to go to the locker room tied.
Nope, we made they play.
I liked the decision.
....and I hoped we would hold them to a field goal. After all, they were about 85 yards away with about a minute left. Hold them to three points, defense.
Nothing wrong with the decision. The defense, when we needed them to step up, laid down.
Like they did later in the fourth quarter.
We stink.
Had we won, we would still stink, but not as bad.
Re: The time outs at the end of the first half.
Ooh, ooh. "Bud Foster isn't the savior". Aren't you special? Grace us with some more pearls of your wisdom. Bless your little brain. You're most comfortable rabble rousing while following the crowd. You'd fit in at an old time lynching in the south.Florida Hokie wrote:Yet another example of why Bud Foster isn't the savior so many think he is. His defenses are getting worked regularly. (Cue the "he has no talent to work with" crowd)oaktonhokie wrote:I was watching this, pleased that the coaches were confident, aggressive and demonstrating that they had faith in our defense.
Miami didn't want to try to score against our vaunted D. They wanted to go to the locker room tied.
Nope, we made they play.
I liked the decision.
....and I hoped we would hold them to a field goal. After all, they were about 85 yards away with about a minute left. Hold them to three points, defense.
Nothing wrong with the decision. The defense, when we needed them to step up, laid down.
Like they did later in the fourth quarter.
We stink.
Had we won, we would still stink, but not as bad.
-
- Posts: 3676
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:05 pm
- Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
- Party: Like a Rock Star
Re: The time outs at the end of the first half.
If you like Bud and think he's the answer then say so. Otherwise, stop trying to be clever.miles wrote:Ooh, ooh. "Bud Foster isn't the savior". Aren't you special? Grace us with some more pearls of your wisdom. Bless your little brain. You're most comfortable rabble rousing while following the crowd. You'd fit in at an old time lynching in the south.Florida Hokie wrote:Yet another example of why Bud Foster isn't the savior so many think he is. His defenses are getting worked regularly. (Cue the "he has no talent to work with" crowd)oaktonhokie wrote:I was watching this, pleased that the coaches were confident, aggressive and demonstrating that they had faith in our defense.
Miami didn't want to try to score against our vaunted D. They wanted to go to the locker room tied.
Nope, we made they play.
I liked the decision.
....and I hoped we would hold them to a field goal. After all, they were about 85 yards away with about a minute left. Hold them to three points, defense.
Nothing wrong with the decision. The defense, when we needed them to step up, laid down.
Like they did later in the fourth quarter.
We stink.
Had we won, we would still stink, but not as bad.
Re: The time outs at the end of the first half.
Et tu, jackass.Florida Hokie wrote:If you like Bud and think he's the answer then say so. Otherwise, stop trying to be clever.miles wrote:Ooh, ooh. "Bud Foster isn't the savior". Aren't you special? Grace us with some more pearls of your wisdom. Bless your little brain. You're most comfortable rabble rousing while following the crowd. You'd fit in at an old time lynching in the south.Florida Hokie wrote:Yet another example of why Bud Foster isn't the savior so many think he is. His defenses are getting worked regularly. (Cue the "he has no talent to work with" crowd)oaktonhokie wrote:I was watching this, pleased that the coaches were confident, aggressive and demonstrating that they had faith in our defense.
Miami didn't want to try to score against our vaunted D. They wanted to go to the locker room tied.
Nope, we made they play.
I liked the decision.
....and I hoped we would hold them to a field goal. After all, they were about 85 yards away with about a minute left. Hold them to three points, defense.
Nothing wrong with the decision. The defense, when we needed them to step up, laid down.
Like they did later in the fourth quarter.
We stink.
Had we won, we would still stink, but not as bad.