VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
USN_Hokie wrote:http://m.heraldcourier.com/news/va-tigh ... l?mode=jqm
Saw that earlier today. That would be explain quite funny.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
- UpstateSCHokie
- Posts: 11998
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:31 pm
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
I remember when the Sarvis voters here refused to believe that McAuliffe would be able to infringe on their 2A rights. But just like Obama, McAuliffe (or any democrat tyrant) doesn't let silly things like laws or Legislatures get in his way of advancing his anti-liberty agenda.USN_Hokie wrote:http://m.heraldcourier.com/news/va-tigh ... l?mode=jqm
“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” ― Voltaire (1694 – 1778)
-
- Posts: 3074
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
I wish the republicans has run someone worth a damn, I wouldn't have had to vote for sarvis.UpstateSCHokie wrote:I remember when the Sarvis voters here refused to believe that McAuliffe would be able to infringe on their 2A rights. But just like Obama, McAuliffe (or any democrat tyrant) doesn't let silly things like laws or Legislatures get in his way of advancing his anti-liberty agenda.USN_Hokie wrote:http://m.heraldcourier.com/news/va-tigh ... l?mode=jqm
- UpstateSCHokie
- Posts: 11998
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:31 pm
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
You can try and rationalize this however you want but the bottom line is, Cuccinelli would not be doing end-arounds on the state Legislature to devalue Va's CWPs. CWPs that people paid good money for I'll remind you. And now without a single vote being cast, those permits will instantly become worthless in 25 other states.HvilleHokie wrote:I wish the republicans has run someone worth a damn, I wouldn't have had to vote for sarvis.UpstateSCHokie wrote:I remember when the Sarvis voters here refused to believe that McAuliffe would be able to infringe on their 2A rights. But just like Obama, McAuliffe (or any democrat tyrant) doesn't let silly things like laws or Legislatures get in his way of advancing his anti-liberty agenda.USN_Hokie wrote:http://m.heraldcourier.com/news/va-tigh ... l?mode=jqm
Good job Sarvis voters.
“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” ― Voltaire (1694 – 1778)
-
- Posts: 3074
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
UpstateSCHokie wrote:You can try and rationalize this however you want but the bottom line is, Cuccinelli would not be doing end-arounds on the state Legislature to devalue Va's CWPs. CWPs that people paid good money for I'll remind you. And now without a single vote being cast, those permits will instantly become worthless in 25 other states.HvilleHokie wrote:I wish the republicans has run someone worth a damn, I wouldn't have had to vote for sarvis.UpstateSCHokie wrote:I remember when the Sarvis voters here refused to believe that McAuliffe would be able to infringe on their 2A rights. But just like Obama, McAuliffe (or any democrat tyrant) doesn't let silly things like laws or Legislatures get in his way of advancing his anti-liberty agenda.USN_Hokie wrote:http://m.heraldcourier.com/news/va-tigh ... l?mode=jqm
Good job Sarvis voters.
Good job va Republican Party.
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
What was your biggest problem with Cuccinelli?HvilleHokie wrote:I wish the republicans has run someone worth a damn, I wouldn't have had to vote for sarvis.UpstateSCHokie wrote:I remember when the Sarvis voters here refused to believe that McAuliffe would be able to infringe on their 2A rights. But just like Obama, McAuliffe (or any democrat tyrant) doesn't let silly things like laws or Legislatures get in his way of advancing his anti-liberty agenda.USN_Hokie wrote:http://m.heraldcourier.com/news/va-tigh ... l?mode=jqm
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
HokieJoe wrote:USN_Hokie wrote:http://m.heraldcourier.com/news/va-tigh ... l?mode=jqm
Saw that earlier today. That would be quite funny.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
-
- Posts: 3074
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
He was an ideologue who used his position as attorney general to advance a number of positions and lawsuits that wasted government resources in order to advance his own career.USN_Hokie wrote:What was your biggest problem with Cuccinelli?HvilleHokie wrote:I wish the republicans has run someone worth a damn, I wouldn't have had to vote for sarvis.UpstateSCHokie wrote:I remember when the Sarvis voters here refused to believe that McAuliffe would be able to infringe on their 2A rights. But just like Obama, McAuliffe (or any democrat tyrant) doesn't let silly things like laws or Legislatures get in his way of advancing his anti-liberty agenda.USN_Hokie wrote:http://m.heraldcourier.com/news/va-tigh ... l?mode=jqm
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
Such as?HvilleHokie wrote:He was an ideologue who used his position as attorney general to advance a number of positions and lawsuits that wasted government resources in order to advance his own career.USN_Hokie wrote:What was your biggest problem with Cuccinelli?HvilleHokie wrote:I wish the republicans has run someone worth a damn, I wouldn't have had to vote for sarvis.UpstateSCHokie wrote:I remember when the Sarvis voters here refused to believe that McAuliffe would be able to infringe on their 2A rights. But just like Obama, McAuliffe (or any democrat tyrant) doesn't let silly things like laws or Legislatures get in his way of advancing his anti-liberty agenda.USN_Hokie wrote:http://m.heraldcourier.com/news/va-tigh ... l?mode=jqm
-
- Posts: 3074
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
His challenge of the epa.USN_Hokie wrote:Such as?HvilleHokie wrote:He was an ideologue who used his position as attorney general to advance a number of positions and lawsuits that wasted government resources in order to advance his own career.USN_Hokie wrote:What was your biggest problem with Cuccinelli?HvilleHokie wrote:I wish the republicans has run someone worth a damn, I wouldn't have had to vote for sarvis.UpstateSCHokie wrote:I remember when the Sarvis voters here refused to believe that McAuliffe would be able to infringe on their 2A rights. But just like Obama, McAuliffe (or any democrat tyrant) doesn't let silly things like laws or Legislatures get in his way of advancing his anti-liberty agenda.USN_Hokie wrote:http://m.heraldcourier.com/news/va-tigh ... l?mode=jqm
His challenge of a climate scientist at uva.
His challenge of Obamacare.
His legal advice to not include homosexuals as protected from discrimination.
His efforts to keep sodomy illegal
All of which were eventually struck down either by the courts or by his superiors.
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
Regarding points 1-3: WADR, sounds like you're just a liberal ideologue who would never vote for a republican.HvilleHokie wrote:
His challenge of the epa.
His challenge of a climate scientist at uva.
His challenge of Obamacare.
His legal advice to not include homosexuals as protected from discrimination.
His efforts to keep sodomy illegal
All of which were eventually struck down either by the courts or by his superiors.
Point 4: AGs provide legal interpretations of the law. VA law was crystal clear on this point.
Point 5: You really thought that Cuccinelli was going to "ban blow jobs?"
-
- Posts: 3074
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
If I were a liberal ideologue, I would have voted for the liberal.USN_Hokie wrote:Regarding points 1-3: WADR, sounds like you're just a liberal ideologue who would never vote for a republican.HvilleHokie wrote:
His challenge of the epa.
His challenge of a climate scientist at uva.
His challenge of Obamacare.
His legal advice to not include homosexuals as protected from discrimination.
His efforts to keep sodomy illegal
All of which were eventually struck down either by the courts or by his superiors.
Point 4: AGs provide legal interpretations of the law. VA law was crystal clear on this point.
Point 5: You really thought that Cuccinelli was going to "ban blow jobs?"
Your inability to see things outside of a 1 dimensional, us-vs-them lens is why we are stuck with terrible candidates. I was criticizing cuccinelli's methods, and you took it as a criticism of his stances. I would suggest you reconsider my post for what it says rather than your limited interpretation of it.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
I love how you blame the republicans for terrible candidates and then vote for a socialist. Yep, you're just a lib.HvilleHokie wrote:If I were a liberal ideologue, I would have voted for the liberal.USN_Hokie wrote:Regarding points 1-3: WADR, sounds like you're just a liberal ideologue who would never vote for a republican.HvilleHokie wrote:
His challenge of the epa.
His challenge of a climate scientist at uva.
His challenge of Obamacare.
His legal advice to not include homosexuals as protected from discrimination.
His efforts to keep sodomy illegal
All of which were eventually struck down either by the courts or by his superiors.
Point 4: AGs provide legal interpretations of the law. VA law was crystal clear on this point.
Point 5: You really thought that Cuccinelli was going to "ban blow jobs?"
Your inability to see things outside of a 1 dimensional, us-vs-them lens is why we are stuck with terrible candidates. I was criticizing cuccinelli's methods, and you took it as a criticism of his stances. I would suggest you reconsider my post for what it says rather than your limited interpretation of it.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
You did - Sarvis supported all those things.HvilleHokie wrote:
If I were a liberal ideologue, I would have voted for the liberal.
No, you specifically mentioned his positions (aka stances). I'll play though - what was wrong with his method regarding Obamacare?HvilleHokie wrote: Your inability to see things outside of a 1 dimensional, us-vs-them lens is why we are stuck with terrible candidates. I was criticizing cuccinelli's methods, and you took it as a criticism of his stances. I would suggest you reconsider my post for what it says rather than your limited interpretation of it.
-
- Posts: 3074
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
This notion that that sarvis is a liberal (much less a socialist) is absurdist sour grapes by in the tank republicans who can't accept that they butchered the 2013 election.
Sarvis is :
* for free market principles
* anti Obamacare
* anti gun control
* for drug reform
* for the government staying out of the marriage business
Bolling would have won the election. And as long as republicans continue to insist on selecting their candidates at the convention rather than using primaries, they will continue putting forth unelectable candidates. Virginia is still a conservative leaning state but we have two democratic senators and a democratic governor. This is a failing of the va Republican Party.
Sarvis is :
* for free market principles
* anti Obamacare
* anti gun control
* for drug reform
* for the government staying out of the marriage business
Bolling would have won the election. And as long as republicans continue to insist on selecting their candidates at the convention rather than using primaries, they will continue putting forth unelectable candidates. Virginia is still a conservative leaning state but we have two democratic senators and a democratic governor. This is a failing of the va Republican Party.
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
Sarvis is (was):HvilleHokie wrote:This notion that that sarvis is a liberal (much less a socialist) is absurdist sour grapes by in the tank republicans who can't accept that they butchered the 2013 election.
Sarvis is :
* for free market principles
* anti Obamacare
* anti gun control
* for drug reform
* for the government staying out of the marriage business
Bolling would have won the election. And as long as republicans continue to insist on selecting their candidates at the convention rather than using primaries, they will continue putting forth unelectable candidates. Virginia is still a conservative leaning state but we have two democratic senators and a democratic governor. This is a failing of the va Republican Party.
* for expansion of medicaid under Obamacare
* against reduction of government / cutting taxes.
* for Keynsian economic policy
I noticed you left "* for open borders" off your list. That might be the only truly libertarian thing about him. I'll also note that Cuccinelli had an arguably libertarian stance on drugs.
PS - Bolling was a cry baby who campaigned for Terry McAuliffe when he lost.
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
I noticed you missed the most obvious response to Upstate's post: I voted for Mark Obenshain. I'm guessing that's because you didn't.HvilleHokie wrote:I wish the republicans has run someone worth a damn, I wouldn't have had to vote for sarvis.UpstateSCHokie wrote:I remember when the Sarvis voters here refused to believe that McAuliffe would be able to infringe on their 2A rights. But just like Obama, McAuliffe (or any democrat tyrant) doesn't let silly things like laws or Legislatures get in his way of advancing his anti-liberty agenda.USN_Hokie wrote:http://m.heraldcourier.com/news/va-tigh ... l?mode=jqm
-
- Posts: 3074
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
You'd be wrong.USN_Hokie wrote:I noticed you missed the most obvious response to Upstate's post: I voted for Mark Obenshain. I'm guessing that's because you didn't.HvilleHokie wrote:I wish the republicans has run someone worth a damn, I wouldn't have had to vote for sarvis.UpstateSCHokie wrote:I remember when the Sarvis voters here refused to believe that McAuliffe would be able to infringe on their 2A rights. But just like Obama, McAuliffe (or any democrat tyrant) doesn't let silly things like laws or Legislatures get in his way of advancing his anti-liberty agenda.USN_Hokie wrote:http://m.heraldcourier.com/news/va-tigh ... l?mode=jqm
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
Don't forget financed by the DNC. He was bait for LIVs that voted based on the L after his name, not based on his policies.USN_Hokie wrote:Sarvis is (was):HvilleHokie wrote:This notion that that sarvis is a liberal (much less a socialist) is absurdist sour grapes by in the tank republicans who can't accept that they butchered the 2013 election.
Sarvis is :
* for free market principles
* anti Obamacare
* anti gun control
* for drug reform
* for the government staying out of the marriage business
Bolling would have won the election. And as long as republicans continue to insist on selecting their candidates at the convention rather than using primaries, they will continue putting forth unelectable candidates. Virginia is still a conservative leaning state but we have two democratic senators and a democratic governor. This is a failing of the va Republican Party.
* for expansion of medicaid under Obamacare
* against reduction of government / cutting taxes.
* for Keynsian economic policy
I noticed you left "* for open borders" off your list. That might be the only truly libertarian thing about him. I'll also note that Cuccinelli had an arguably libertarian stance on drugs.
PS - Bolling was a cry baby who campaigned for Terry McAuliffe when he lost.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
You rednecks never learn. Good luck with the social issues in 16.USN_Hokie wrote:Sarvis is (was):HvilleHokie wrote:This notion that that sarvis is a liberal (much less a socialist) is absurdist sour grapes by in the tank republicans who can't accept that they butchered the 2013 election.
Sarvis is :
* for free market principles
* anti Obamacare
* anti gun control
* for drug reform
* for the government staying out of the marriage business
Bolling would have won the election. And as long as republicans continue to insist on selecting their candidates at the convention rather than using primaries, they will continue putting forth unelectable candidates. Virginia is still a conservative leaning state but we have two democratic senators and a democratic governor. This is a failing of the va Republican Party.
* for expansion of medicaid under Obamacare
* against reduction of government / cutting taxes.
* for Keynsian economic policy
I noticed you left "* for open borders" off your list. That might be the only truly libertarian thing about him. I'll also note that Cuccinelli had an arguably libertarian stance on drugs.
PS - Bolling was a cry baby who campaigned for Terry McAuliffe when he lost.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 3074
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
1. Why are you posting this here? It has nothing to do with the topic.HvilleHokie wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/28/politics/ ... =obnetwork
2. Please tell me you're intelligent enough to understand that the primary "pledge" has 0.000% to do with Trump.
-
- Posts: 3074
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
Upstate brought up sarvis. Which prompted a discussion on why he garnered so much support. Which prompted a discussion on why the va gop has had problems. This is directly related to that.USN_Hokie wrote:1. Why are you posting this here? It has nothing to do with the topic.HvilleHokie wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/28/politics/ ... =obnetwork
2. Please tell me you're intelligent enough to understand that the primary "pledge" has 0.000% to do with Trump.
I'm not sur I understand your second point. The article is about trump's comments on the pledge. Nothing more, nothing less.
Re: VA GOP may strip McAuliffe of his protection detail
1. You need to decide if Trump is a carnival barker, or an omniscient god on earth and savior of democratic principles. This is just more trolling on his part for free advertising. CNN is eating it up since he's attacking Republicans.HvilleHokie wrote:Upstate brought up sarvis. Which prompted a discussion on why he garnered so much support. Which prompted a discussion on why the va gop has had problems. This is directly related to that.USN_Hokie wrote:1. Why are you posting this here? It has nothing to do with the topic.HvilleHokie wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/28/politics/ ... =obnetwork
2. Please tell me you're intelligent enough to understand that the primary "pledge" has 0.000% to do with Trump.
I'm not sur I understand your second point. The article is about trump's comments on the pledge. Nothing more, nothing less.
2. Everyone knows the "pledge" was concocted to counter Democrat election spoilers. The Virginia GOP is asking voters to sign it for the same reason the national GOP asked Trump to sign it: