uh oh
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
uh oh
http://theconcourse.deadspin.com/donald ... 1787545407
Donations to Mountain Stage, West Virginia public radio can be made at the site linked below for your convenience:
https://secure.wvpublic.org/donate/
Donations to Mountain Stage, West Virginia public radio can be made at the site linked below for your convenience:
https://secure.wvpublic.org/donate/
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: uh oh
Good luckUSN_Hokie wrote:Low info fodder.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: uh oh
LOL. He really has no control over his mouth.ip_law-hokie wrote:http://theconcourse.deadspin.com/donald ... 1787545407
Donations to Mountain Stage, West Virginia public radio can be made at the site linked below for your convenience:
https://secure.wvpublic.org/donate/
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: uh oh
Atta boy!USN_Hokie wrote:Low info fodder.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: uh oh
Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.USN_Hokie wrote:Low info fodder.
- absolutvt03
- Posts: 2217
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 5:21 pm
- Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
- Party: Voter Apathy
Re: uh oh
B/c it's obviously low info for someone to expect a candidate for President of the United States to not talk like an FSU quarterback...HokieFanDC wrote:Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.USN_Hokie wrote:Low info fodder.
Forum rules: Please be civil.
"You do suck and are a terrible human being." - awesome guy
"maybe because you're autistic" - USN_Hokie
Seriously... there's only ONE rule.
"You do suck and are a terrible human being." - awesome guy
"maybe because you're autistic" - USN_Hokie
Seriously... there's only ONE rule.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: uh oh
Below, Uppity provided a definition of low-info:HokieFanDC wrote:Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.USN_Hokie wrote:Low info fodder.
"LIVs are the people that are either unaware, or unwilling to admit that Clinton is the most corrupt politician ever to run for the POTUS and are planning to still vote for her."
This is low-info fodder because, if you make mention of the GOP Presidential nominee referring to being able to, by virtue of his fame, "grab women by the pussy," it is more likely that you "are either unaware, or unwilling to admit that Clinton is the most corrupt politician ever to run for the POTUS and are planning to still vote for her." Got it?
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: uh oh
So, if you are someone who is unaware, or unwilling to admit that Trump is the least qualified person to ever run for POTUS (at least in our lifetime), and are still planning to vote for him, that makes you well-informed?ip_law-hokie wrote:Below, Uppity provided a definition of low-info:HokieFanDC wrote:Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.USN_Hokie wrote:Low info fodder.
"LIVs are the people that are either unaware, or unwilling to admit that Clinton is the most corrupt politician ever to run for the POTUS and are planning to still vote for her."
This is low-info fodder because, if you make mention of the GOP Presidential nominee referring to being able to, by virtue of his fame, "grab women by the pussy," it is more likely that you "are either unaware, or unwilling to admit that Clinton is the most corrupt politician ever to run for the POTUS and are planning to still vote for her." Got it?
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: uh oh
Not sure. But you would NOT be a LIV.HokieFanDC wrote:So, if you are someone who is unaware, or unwilling to admit that Trump is the least qualified person to ever run for POTUS (at least in our lifetime), and are still planning to vote for him, that makes you well-informed?ip_law-hokie wrote:Below, Uppity provided a definition of low-info:HokieFanDC wrote:Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.USN_Hokie wrote:Low info fodder.
"LIVs are the people that are either unaware, or unwilling to admit that Clinton is the most corrupt politician ever to run for the POTUS and are planning to still vote for her."
This is low-info fodder because, if you make mention of the GOP Presidential nominee referring to being able to, by virtue of his fame, "grab women by the pussy," it is more likely that you "are either unaware, or unwilling to admit that Clinton is the most corrupt politician ever to run for the POTUS and are planning to still vote for her." Got it?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
Re: uh oh
Obviously!HokieFanDC wrote:So, if you are someone who is unaware, or unwilling to admit that Trump is the least qualified person to ever run for POTUS (at least in our lifetime), and are still planning to vote for him, that makes you well-informed?ip_law-hokie wrote:Below, Uppity provided a definition of low-info:HokieFanDC wrote:Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.USN_Hokie wrote:Low info fodder.
"LIVs are the people that are either unaware, or unwilling to admit that Clinton is the most corrupt politician ever to run for the POTUS and are planning to still vote for her."
This is low-info fodder because, if you make mention of the GOP Presidential nominee referring to being able to, by virtue of his fame, "grab women by the pussy," it is more likely that you "are either unaware, or unwilling to admit that Clinton is the most corrupt politician ever to run for the POTUS and are planning to still vote for her." Got it?
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: uh oh
We are #blessed that these intellectuals grace us with their presence (and donations to WV public radio).nolanvt wrote:Obviously!HokieFanDC wrote:So, if you are someone who is unaware, or unwilling to admit that Trump is the least qualified person to ever run for POTUS (at least in our lifetime), and are still planning to vote for him, that makes you well-informed?ip_law-hokie wrote:Below, Uppity provided a definition of low-info:HokieFanDC wrote:Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.USN_Hokie wrote:Low info fodder.
"LIVs are the people that are either unaware, or unwilling to admit that Clinton is the most corrupt politician ever to run for the POTUS and are planning to still vote for her."
This is low-info fodder because, if you make mention of the GOP Presidential nominee referring to being able to, by virtue of his fame, "grab women by the pussy," it is more likely that you "are either unaware, or unwilling to admit that Clinton is the most corrupt politician ever to run for the POTUS and are planning to still vote for her." Got it?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: uh oh
absolutvt03 wrote:B/c it's obviously low info for someone to expect a candidate for President of the United States to not talk like an FSU quarterback...HokieFanDC wrote:Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.USN_Hokie wrote:Low info fodder.
Somewhere, God is busy shortening his list of future roommates based on people voting for Trump. I mean, if you support Trump, you obviously support adultery, and hate monogamy and marriage.
Last edited by HokieFanDC on Fri Oct 07, 2016 10:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: uh oh
Have you worked on your speech for when you accept the Fundraiser of the Year award?ip_law-hokie wrote:
We are #blessed that these intellectuals grace us with their presence (and donations to WV public radio).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
Re: uh oh
Low info is not reading the link to see this was from over a decade ago when he was running for....no office at all.absolutvt03 wrote:B/c it's obviously low info for someone to expect a candidate for President of the United States to not talk like an FSU quarterback...HokieFanDC wrote:Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.USN_Hokie wrote:Low info fodder.
Re: uh oh
No, we read it.USN_Hokie wrote:Low info is not reading the link to see this was from over a decade ago when he was running for....no office at all.absolutvt03 wrote:B/c it's obviously low info for someone to expect a candidate for President of the United States to not talk like an FSU quarterback...HokieFanDC wrote:Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.USN_Hokie wrote:Low info fodder.
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: uh oh
Indeed. Who hasn't been hot miked for a TV show and made comments about trying to have sex with married women and grabbing women by the pussy while in their younger years (well into their sixties at least).USN_Hokie wrote:You've said worse in private settings I'm sure.HokieFanDC wrote:Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.USN_Hokie wrote:Low info fodder.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
Re: uh oh
You mean talked about not having sex with married women right? This feigned outrage is coming from the party that used 18 year old interns for humidors correct? I just want to make sure I have this rightip_law-hokie wrote:Indeed. Who hasn't been hot miked for a TV show and made comments about trying to have sex with married women and grabbing women by the pussy while in their younger years (well into their sixties at least).USN_Hokie wrote:You've said worse in private settings I'm sure.HokieFanDC wrote:Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.USN_Hokie wrote:Low info fodder.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Edit: Ok, I just watched the video(hot mic). I must have misread the the quotes; I thought he was quoted as saying "but she's married." Sounds like he was hitting on a married woman, which is not cool.
Last edited by USN_Hokie on Fri Oct 07, 2016 11:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: uh oh
Right on cue. Atta boy!USN_Hokie wrote:You mean talked about not having sex with married women right? This feigned outrage is coming from the party that used 18 year old interns for humidors correct? I just want to make sure I have this rightip_law-hokie wrote:Indeed. Who hasn't been hot miked for a TV show and made comments about trying to have sex with married women and grabbing women by the pussy while in their younger years (well into their sixties at least).USN_Hokie wrote:You've said worse in private settings I'm sure.HokieFanDC wrote:Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.USN_Hokie wrote:Low info fodder.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: uh oh
Well, if Hillary was looking for a way to make Trump talk about her husband's infidelity and rape accusations, this was it. Should be fun on Sunday (Westworld better still be on).HokieFanDC wrote:Atta boy!USN_Hokie wrote:You mean talked about not having sex with married women right? This feigned outrage is coming from the party that used 18 year old interns for humidors correct? I just want to make sure I have this rightip_law-hokie wrote:Indeed. Who hasn't been hot miked for a TV show and made comments about trying to have sex with married women and grabbing women by the pussy while in their younger years (well into their sixties at least).USN_Hokie wrote:You've said worse in private settings I'm sure.HokieFanDC wrote:Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.USN_Hokie wrote:Low info fodder.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Right on cue.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: uh oh
Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.[/quote]
You've said worse in private settings I'm sure.[/quote]
Indeed. Who hasn't been hot miked for a TV show and made comments about trying to have sex with married women and grabbing women by the pussy while in their younger years (well into their sixties at least).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
You mean talked about not having sex with married women right? This feigned outrage is coming from the party that used 18 year old interns for humidors correct? I just want to make sure I have this right[/quote]
Atta boy![/quote]
Well, if Hillary was looking for a way to make Trump talk about her husband's infidelity and rape accusations, this was it. Should be fun on Sunday (Westworld better still be on).
Right on cue.[/quote]
Uh uh. You guys always deflect back to Hillary. Which might matter to me if i was voting for Hillary.
Gary Johnson and Evan McMullin are both better people than these two. Most people are. I'm also considering a wrtie in vote, which is still better than those two.
You've said worse in private settings I'm sure.[/quote]
Indeed. Who hasn't been hot miked for a TV show and made comments about trying to have sex with married women and grabbing women by the pussy while in their younger years (well into their sixties at least).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
You mean talked about not having sex with married women right? This feigned outrage is coming from the party that used 18 year old interns for humidors correct? I just want to make sure I have this right[/quote]
Atta boy![/quote]
Well, if Hillary was looking for a way to make Trump talk about her husband's infidelity and rape accusations, this was it. Should be fun on Sunday (Westworld better still be on).
Right on cue.[/quote]
Uh uh. You guys always deflect back to Hillary. Which might matter to me if i was voting for Hillary.
Gary Johnson and Evan McMullin are both better people than these two. Most people are. I'm also considering a wrtie in vote, which is still better than those two.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: uh oh
Got it.USN_Hokie wrote:You mean talked about not having sex with married women right? This feigned outrage is coming from the party that used 18 year old interns for humidors correct? I just want to make sure I have this rightip_law-hokie wrote:Indeed. Who hasn't been hot miked for a TV show and made comments about trying to have sex with married women and grabbing women by the pussy while in their younger years (well into their sixties at least).USN_Hokie wrote:You've said worse in private settings I'm sure.HokieFanDC wrote:Why is it "low info" fodder? That makes no sense.USN_Hokie wrote:Low info fodder.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
Re: uh oh
Yup. I mean...if USN wants me to, I could vote for Hillary if he'd like, but both of these clowns are unacceptable.HokieFanDC wrote:Uh uh. You guys always deflect back to Hillary. Which might matter to me if i was voting for Hillary.
Gary Johnson and Evan McMullin are both better people than these two. Most people are. I'm also considering a wrtie in vote, which is still better than those two.
Fully vaccinated, still not dead