So you're sticking with the one who donated to both parties, and the one who has zero donations, are uber libs?awesome guy wrote:They're max level donations, not a grand here and there thing. And they've already been caught withholding evidence in other cases. Witch hunters.HokieFanDC wrote:awesome guy wrote:Dude, they're all uber libs. No balance in the office, you should be all over that as it's not Noah's Ark.HokieFanDC wrote:The first one may be valid.RiverguyVT wrote: Comey essentially picked him by creating this situation.
His conflicts of interest where Comey is involved.
His hires so far are just the opposite of impartial.
The second one is valid.
The third one is whiney nonsense. Anyone he picks is going to have some political affiliation. They are professionals, though.
What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
my problem is they are tainted from their shoddy law work before, surely they can find lawyers that are not taintedHokieFanDC wrote:awesome guy wrote:Dude, they're all uber libs. No balance in the office, you should be all over that as it's not Noah's Ark.HokieFanDC wrote:The first one may be valid.RiverguyVT wrote:Comey essentially picked him by creating this situation.HokieFanDC wrote:RiverguyVT wrote:Mueller needs to go
Why??
His conflicts of interest where Comey is involved.
His hires so far are just the opposite of impartial.
The second one is valid.
The third one is whiney nonsense. Anyone he picks is going to have some political affiliation. They are professionals, though.
What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
Yepcwtcr hokie wrote:my problem is they are tainted from their shoddy law work before, surely they can find lawyers that are not taintedHokieFanDC wrote:awesome guy wrote:Dude, they're all uber libs. No balance in the office, you should be all over that as it's not Noah's Ark.HokieFanDC wrote:The first one may be valid.RiverguyVT wrote:Comey essentially picked him by creating this situation.HokieFanDC wrote:
Why??
His conflicts of interest where Comey is involved.
His hires so far are just the opposite of impartial.
The second one is valid.
The third one is whiney nonsense. Anyone he picks is going to have some political affiliation. They are professionals, though.
What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
At least are uber libs, since you're in hair splitting mode.HokieFanDC wrote:So you're sticking with the one who donated to both parties, and the one who has zero donations, are uber libs?awesome guy wrote:They're max level donations, not a grand here and there thing. And they've already been caught withholding evidence in other cases. Witch hunters.HokieFanDC wrote:awesome guy wrote:Dude, they're all uber libs. No balance in the office, you should be all over that as it's not Noah's Ark.HokieFanDC wrote:The first one may be valid.RiverguyVT wrote: Comey essentially picked him by creating this situation.
His conflicts of interest where Comey is involved.
His hires so far are just the opposite of impartial.
The second one is valid.
The third one is whiney nonsense. Anyone he picks is going to have some political affiliation. They are professionals, though.
What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 11220
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
1 represented the Clinton FoundationHokieFanDC wrote:awesome guy wrote:Dude, they're all uber libs. No balance in the office, you should be all over that as it's not Noah's Ark.HokieFanDC wrote:The first one may be valid.RiverguyVT wrote:Comey essentially picked him by creating this situation.HokieFanDC wrote:RiverguyVT wrote:Mueller needs to go
Why??
His conflicts of interest where Comey is involved.
His hires so far are just the opposite of impartial.
The second one is valid.
The third one is whiney nonsense. Anyone he picks is going to have some political affiliation. They are professionals, though.
What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
3 donated to the Hillary! campaign
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
Please tell me about the shoddy law work? Not familiar with that.awesome guy wrote:Yepcwtcr hokie wrote:my problem is they are tainted from their shoddy law work before, surely they can find lawyers that are not taintedHokieFanDC wrote:awesome guy wrote:Dude, they're all uber libs. No balance in the office, you should be all over that as it's not Noah's Ark.HokieFanDC wrote:The first one may be valid.RiverguyVT wrote: Comey essentially picked him by creating this situation.
His conflicts of interest where Comey is involved.
His hires so far are just the opposite of impartial.
The second one is valid.
The third one is whiney nonsense. Anyone he picks is going to have some political affiliation. They are professionals, though.
What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
They withheld evidence in a previous case.HokieFanDC wrote:Please tell me about the shoddy law work? Not familiar with that.awesome guy wrote:Yepcwtcr hokie wrote:my problem is they are tainted from their shoddy law work before, surely they can find lawyers that are not taintedHokieFanDC wrote:awesome guy wrote:Dude, they're all uber libs. No balance in the office, you should be all over that as it's not Noah's Ark.HokieFanDC wrote: The first one may be valid.
The second one is valid.
The third one is whiney nonsense. Anyone he picks is going to have some political affiliation. They are professionals, though.
What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
You said "all", I'm not splitting hairs.awesome guy wrote:At least are uber libs, since you're in hair splitting mode.HokieFanDC wrote:So you're sticking with the one who donated to both parties, and the one who has zero donations, are uber libs?awesome guy wrote:They're max level donations, not a grand here and there thing. And they've already been caught withholding evidence in other cases. Witch hunters.HokieFanDC wrote:awesome guy wrote:
Dude, they're all uber libs. No balance in the office, you should be all over that as it's not Noah's Ark.
What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
Ok, busted.HokieFanDC wrote:You said "all", I'm not splitting hairs.awesome guy wrote:At least are uber libs, since you're in hair splitting mode.HokieFanDC wrote:So you're sticking with the one who donated to both parties, and the one who has zero donations, are uber libs?awesome guy wrote:They're max level donations, not a grand here and there thing. And they've already been caught withholding evidence in other cases. Witch hunters.HokieFanDC wrote:awesome guy wrote:
Dude, they're all uber libs. No balance in the office, you should be all over that as it's not Noah's Ark.
What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
So, we'll go with most of them? Or is that too in the middle?awesome guy wrote:Ok, busted.HokieFanDC wrote:You said "all", I'm not splitting hairs.awesome guy wrote:At least are uber libs, since you're in hair splitting mode.HokieFanDC wrote:So you're sticking with the one who donated to both parties, and the one who has zero donations, are uber libs?awesome guy wrote:
They're max level donations, not a grand here and there thing. And they've already been caught withholding evidence in other cases. Witch hunters.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
I'll go with mostHokieFanDC wrote:So, we'll go with most of them? Or is that too in the middle?awesome guy wrote:Ok, busted.HokieFanDC wrote:You said "all", I'm not splitting hairs.awesome guy wrote:At least are uber libs, since you're in hair splitting mode.HokieFanDC wrote:So you're sticking with the one who donated to both parties, and the one who has zero donations, are uber libs?awesome guy wrote:
They're max level donations, not a grand here and there thing. And they've already been caught withholding evidence in other cases. Witch hunters.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- HooFighter
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 1:16 pm
- Party: all the time
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
Yes.USN_Hokie wrote:Do you disapprove of shooting your way to a Congressional majority?
See above.USN_Hokie wrote:Is there anything on his Facebook page you'd disagree with? If not, how are you any different?
Donald Trump is a stupid man's idea of a smart man, a poor man's idea of a rich man, and a weak man's idea of a strong man.
-
- Posts: 1412
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 12:44 am
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
Boo,Hoo!!HooFighter wrote:They should just tweet about how oppressed they are and how everyone is out to get them.cwtcr hokie wrote:The best part is these morons know they are breaking the law and run around in vehicles that have lights out or other major mechanical issues are incredulous when they get pulled over.
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
That's moderate to HokieFanDC.133743Hokie wrote: 1 represented the Clinton Foundation
3 donated to the Hillary! campaign
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
See above? Nope, sorry, the shooting wasn't on his Facebook page.HooFighter wrote:Yes.USN_Hokie wrote:Do you disapprove of shooting your way to a Congressional majority?
See above.USN_Hokie wrote:Is there anything on his Facebook page you'd disagree with? If not, how are you any different?
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
And another swing and a miss. Your level of miscomprehension is becoming epic.USN_Hokie wrote:That's moderate to HokieFanDC.133743Hokie wrote: 1 represented the Clinton Foundation
3 donated to the Hillary! campaign
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
Seems everyone has issues comprehending you, must be us.HokieFanDC wrote:And another swing and a miss. Your level of miscomprehension is becoming epic.USN_Hokie wrote:That's moderate to HokieFanDC.133743Hokie wrote: 1 represented the Clinton Foundation
3 donated to the Hillary! campaign
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
Must be. I didn't say they were moderate. I said all of them weren't uber libs. Just most. And well, you agreed. So, clearly, you have problems understanding yourself.awesome guy wrote:Seems everyone has issues comprehending you, must be us.HokieFanDC wrote:And another swing and a miss. Your level of miscomprehension is becoming epic.USN_Hokie wrote:That's moderate to HokieFanDC.133743Hokie wrote: 1 represented the Clinton Foundation
3 donated to the Hillary! campaign
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
Uh huhHokieFanDC wrote:Must be. I didn't say they were moderate. I said all of them weren't uber libs. Just most. And well, you agreed. So, clearly, you have problems understanding yourself.awesome guy wrote:Seems everyone has issues comprehending you, must be us.HokieFanDC wrote:And another swing and a miss. Your level of miscomprehension is becoming epic.USN_Hokie wrote:That's moderate to HokieFanDC.133743Hokie wrote: 1 represented the Clinton Foundation
3 donated to the Hillary! campaign
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
Who, and what cases?awesome guy wrote:They withheld evidence in a previous case.HokieFanDC wrote:Please tell me about the shoddy law work? Not familiar with that.awesome guy wrote:Yepcwtcr hokie wrote:my problem is they are tainted from their shoddy law work before, surely they can find lawyers that are not taintedHokieFanDC wrote:awesome guy wrote: Dude, they're all uber libs. No balance in the office, you should be all over that as it's not Noah's Ark.
What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
I'll have to check, that's what Newt said on the tube.HokieFanDC wrote:Who, and what cases?awesome guy wrote:They withheld evidence in a previous case.HokieFanDC wrote:Please tell me about the shoddy law work? Not familiar with that.awesome guy wrote:Yepcwtcr hokie wrote:my problem is they are tainted from their shoddy law work before, surely they can find lawyers that are not taintedHokieFanDC wrote:
What about all of them, makes them uber libs?
2 of them have donated solely to Dem candidates.
1 of them has donated to both Dems and Pubs.
1 of them has not made any donations.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30315
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
Whiney or not, any one of these reasons alone is enough by itself.HokieFanDC wrote:The first one may be valid.RiverguyVT wrote:Comey essentially picked him by creating this situation.HokieFanDC wrote:RiverguyVT wrote:Mueller needs to go
Why??
His conflicts of interest where Comey is involved.
His hires so far are just the opposite of impartial.
The second one is valid.
The third one is whiney nonsense. Anyone he picks is going to have some political affiliation. They are professionals, though.
The next 25 posts aren't needed if one reason, alone, is enough.
This whole thing is a circus, unnecessary, etc.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
Did you or did you not admit in another thread that Trump had the right to fire Comey? If so, the entire premise of this purse fight is moot.HokieFanDC wrote:Who, and what cases?awesome guy wrote: They withheld evidence in a previous case.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
Mueller has been around long enough, and has been reputable, respected, and distinguished for a long time, that it should take more than Newt bitching, to get rid of him.RiverguyVT wrote:Whiney or not, any one of these reasons alone is enough by itself.HokieFanDC wrote:The first one may be valid.RiverguyVT wrote:Comey essentially picked him by creating this situation.HokieFanDC wrote:RiverguyVT wrote:Mueller needs to go
Why??
His conflicts of interest where Comey is involved.
His hires so far are just the opposite of impartial.
The second one is valid.
The third one is whiney nonsense. Anyone he picks is going to have some political affiliation. They are professionals, though.
The next 25 posts aren't needed if one reason, alone, is enough.
This whole thing is a circus, unnecessary, etc.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: So Mueller is investigating for obstruction on a premise
I didn't "admit" that, that's a bizarre way to put it, but Trump certainly has the authority to do so.USN_Hokie wrote:Did you or did you not admit in another thread that Trump had the right to fire Comey? If so, the entire premise of this purse fight is moot.HokieFanDC wrote:Who, and what cases?awesome guy wrote: They withheld evidence in a previous case.
Not sure how that is meaningful.