Investigation a cover for something worse than Watergate?
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
- HokieDan95
- Posts: 1294
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:35 pm
- Contact:
Investigation a cover for something worse than Watergate?
"What's best in life?","To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women."
Re: Investigation a cover for something worse than Watergate
I've thought this from the beginning. They never thought he would win, so they weren't afraid to cheat. Now they need to create a shirt show so they can toss up their arms and say "let's just call it even" when the dust settles.
-
- Posts: 11324
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 8:48 pm
Re: Investigation a cover for something worse than Watergate
I am a little surprised, swabbie.
I assumed that they didn't contest michigan, wisconsin and pennyslvania because they are the ones who cheated and they didn't want that to be revealed.
But it would be the height of arrogance and i guess perfectly in keeping with socialism, to believe that buried under the excrement of two tons of socialist corruption from the campaign, there may be....MAY BE a nugget of republican wrongdoing. Or something that can be spun into wrong doing. And the assumption that everyone will ignore the two tons of excrement because the media tells them to keep looking for the R mischief, is either absurdly stupid or absurdly arrogant.
Why isn't obama putting the brakes on this? Or holder or the cheats at the irs or the deep state? My guess is that they figure the deep state can destroy, cover up or bury the corruption from obama, fat hillary, holder et al.
Pretty risky. The american people are stupid, but maybe not stupid enough...
I assumed that they didn't contest michigan, wisconsin and pennyslvania because they are the ones who cheated and they didn't want that to be revealed.
But it would be the height of arrogance and i guess perfectly in keeping with socialism, to believe that buried under the excrement of two tons of socialist corruption from the campaign, there may be....MAY BE a nugget of republican wrongdoing. Or something that can be spun into wrong doing. And the assumption that everyone will ignore the two tons of excrement because the media tells them to keep looking for the R mischief, is either absurdly stupid or absurdly arrogant.
Why isn't obama putting the brakes on this? Or holder or the cheats at the irs or the deep state? My guess is that they figure the deep state can destroy, cover up or bury the corruption from obama, fat hillary, holder et al.
Pretty risky. The american people are stupid, but maybe not stupid enough...
USN_Hokie wrote:I've thought this from the beginning. They never thought he would win, so they weren't afraid to cheat. Now they need to create a shirt show so they can toss up their arms and say "let's just call it even" when the dust settles.
If you bend over backwards long enough,
eventually you'll fall down.
eventually you'll fall down.
Re: Investigation a cover for something worse than Watergate
I read an interesting argument earlier - that Mueller's team's purpose isn't just to try and make some pretext for impeachment of Trump, but also (and possibly primarily) to either cover up / manipulate evidence of the Obama administration's wrongdoing, or (more likely) to craft an argument for defense. After all, they're looking at the same information which would be used to prosecute the Obama administration.oaktonhokie wrote:I am a little surprised, swabbie.
I assumed that they didn't contest michigan, wisconsin and pennyslvania because they are the ones who cheated and they didn't want that to be revealed.
But it would be the height of arrogance and i guess perfectly in keeping with socialism, to believe that buried under the excrement of two tons of socialist corruption from the campaign, there may be....MAY BE a nugget of republican wrongdoing. Or something that can be spun into wrong doing. And the assumption that everyone will ignore the two tons of excrement because the media tells them to keep looking for the R mischief, is either absurdly stupid or absurdly arrogant.
Why isn't obama putting the brakes on this? Or holder or the cheats at the irs or the deep state? My guess is that they figure the deep state can destroy, cover up or bury the corruption from obama, fat hillary, holder et al.
Pretty risky. The american people are stupid, but maybe not stupid enough...
USN_Hokie wrote:I've thought this from the beginning. They never thought he would win, so they weren't afraid to cheat. Now they need to create a shirt show so they can toss up their arms and say "let's just call it even" when the dust settles.
- HokieHam
- Posts: 26682
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
- Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
Re: Investigation a cover for something worse than Watergate
The whole "Russia" thing is a shiRtshow distraction from the REAL issue.HokieDan95 wrote:http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/267923/ ... greenfield
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."
ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
-
- Posts: 11220
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am
Re: Investigation a cover for something worse than Watergate
So we'll need a special prosecutor to investigate the special counsel? Or maybe just an AG with a spine, some backbone.USN_Hokie wrote:I read an interesting argument earlier - that Mueller's team's purpose isn't just to try and make some pretext for impeachment of Trump, but also (and possibly primarily) to either cover up / manipulate evidence of the Obama administration's wrongdoing, or (more likely) to craft an argument for defense. After all, they're looking at the same information which would be used to prosecute the Obama administration.oaktonhokie wrote:I am a little surprised, swabbie.
I assumed that they didn't contest michigan, wisconsin and pennyslvania because they are the ones who cheated and they didn't want that to be revealed.
But it would be the height of arrogance and i guess perfectly in keeping with socialism, to believe that buried under the excrement of two tons of socialist corruption from the campaign, there may be....MAY BE a nugget of republican wrongdoing. Or something that can be spun into wrong doing. And the assumption that everyone will ignore the two tons of excrement because the media tells them to keep looking for the R mischief, is either absurdly stupid or absurdly arrogant.
Why isn't obama putting the brakes on this? Or holder or the cheats at the irs or the deep state? My guess is that they figure the deep state can destroy, cover up or bury the corruption from obama, fat hillary, holder et al.
Pretty risky. The american people are stupid, but maybe not stupid enough...
USN_Hokie wrote:I've thought this from the beginning. They never thought he would win, so they weren't afraid to cheat. Now they need to create a shirt show so they can toss up their arms and say "let's just call it even" when the dust settles.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Investigation a cover for something worse than Watergate
This AG is all backbone!133743Hokie wrote:So we'll need a special prosecutor to investigate the special counsel? Or maybe just an AG with a spine, some backbone.USN_Hokie wrote:I read an interesting argument earlier - that Mueller's team's purpose isn't just to try and make some pretext for impeachment of Trump, but also (and possibly primarily) to either cover up / manipulate evidence of the Obama administration's wrongdoing, or (more likely) to craft an argument for defense. After all, they're looking at the same information which would be used to prosecute the Obama administration.oaktonhokie wrote:I am a little surprised, swabbie.
I assumed that they didn't contest michigan, wisconsin and pennyslvania because they are the ones who cheated and they didn't want that to be revealed.
But it would be the height of arrogance and i guess perfectly in keeping with socialism, to believe that buried under the excrement of two tons of socialist corruption from the campaign, there may be....MAY BE a nugget of republican wrongdoing. Or something that can be spun into wrong doing. And the assumption that everyone will ignore the two tons of excrement because the media tells them to keep looking for the R mischief, is either absurdly stupid or absurdly arrogant.
Why isn't obama putting the brakes on this? Or holder or the cheats at the irs or the deep state? My guess is that they figure the deep state can destroy, cover up or bury the corruption from obama, fat hillary, holder et al.
Pretty risky. The american people are stupid, but maybe not stupid enough...
USN_Hokie wrote:I've thought this from the beginning. They never thought he would win, so they weren't afraid to cheat. Now they need to create a shirt show so they can toss up their arms and say "let's just call it even" when the dust settles.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Investigation a cover for something worse than Watergate
You guys are awfully quick to turn on your own.133743Hokie wrote:So we'll need a special prosecutor to investigate the special counsel? Or maybe just an AG with a spine, some backbone.USN_Hokie wrote:I read an interesting argument earlier - that Mueller's team's purpose isn't just to try and make some pretext for impeachment of Trump, but also (and possibly primarily) to either cover up / manipulate evidence of the Obama administration's wrongdoing, or (more likely) to craft an argument for defense. After all, they're looking at the same information which would be used to prosecute the Obama administration.oaktonhokie wrote:I am a little surprised, swabbie.
I assumed that they didn't contest michigan, wisconsin and pennyslvania because they are the ones who cheated and they didn't want that to be revealed.
But it would be the height of arrogance and i guess perfectly in keeping with socialism, to believe that buried under the excrement of two tons of socialist corruption from the campaign, there may be....MAY BE a nugget of republican wrongdoing. Or something that can be spun into wrong doing. And the assumption that everyone will ignore the two tons of excrement because the media tells them to keep looking for the R mischief, is either absurdly stupid or absurdly arrogant.
Why isn't obama putting the brakes on this? Or holder or the cheats at the irs or the deep state? My guess is that they figure the deep state can destroy, cover up or bury the corruption from obama, fat hillary, holder et al.
Pretty risky. The american people are stupid, but maybe not stupid enough...
USN_Hokie wrote:I've thought this from the beginning. They never thought he would win, so they weren't afraid to cheat. Now they need to create a shirt show so they can toss up their arms and say "let's just call it even" when the dust settles.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Investigation a cover for something worse than Watergate
I have been saying that, they brought in Mueller but the stuff he is finding is damning for the dems, will anything come of it, I doubt it thoughHokieDan95 wrote:http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/267923/ ... greenfield
-
- Posts: 11220
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am
Re: Investigation a cover for something worse than Watergate
Sessions, in his haste to please his senate brethren (after all, it's the worlds saucer!) abdicated from his responsibility to the country as AG. He recused himself from being a part of any and all things related to Trump, Russia, the election, whatever, even though there was no evidence of any crime. He acted as a senator, not as an AG. He wasn't the right man for the job because he still saw himself as a senator first.ip_law-hokie wrote:You guys are awfully quick to turn on your own.133743Hokie wrote:So we'll need a special prosecutor to investigate the special counsel? Or maybe just an AG with a spine, some backbone.USN_Hokie wrote:I read an interesting argument earlier - that Mueller's team's purpose isn't just to try and make some pretext for impeachment of Trump, but also (and possibly primarily) to either cover up / manipulate evidence of the Obama administration's wrongdoing, or (more likely) to craft an argument for defense. After all, they're looking at the same information which would be used to prosecute the Obama administration.oaktonhokie wrote:I am a little surprised, swabbie.
I assumed that they didn't contest michigan, wisconsin and pennyslvania because they are the ones who cheated and they didn't want that to be revealed.
But it would be the height of arrogance and i guess perfectly in keeping with socialism, to believe that buried under the excrement of two tons of socialist corruption from the campaign, there may be....MAY BE a nugget of republican wrongdoing. Or something that can be spun into wrong doing. And the assumption that everyone will ignore the two tons of excrement because the media tells them to keep looking for the R mischief, is either absurdly stupid or absurdly arrogant.
Why isn't obama putting the brakes on this? Or holder or the cheats at the irs or the deep state? My guess is that they figure the deep state can destroy, cover up or bury the corruption from obama, fat hillary, holder et al.
Pretty risky. The american people are stupid, but maybe not stupid enough...
USN_Hokie wrote:I've thought this from the beginning. They never thought he would win, so they weren't afraid to cheat. Now they need to create a shirt show so they can toss up their arms and say "let's just call it even" when the dust settles.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Investigation a cover for something worse than Watergate
Huh?? Sessions was criticized from day one of the Mueller appt, this is not newip_law-hokie wrote:You guys are awfully quick to turn on your own.133743Hokie wrote:So we'll need a special prosecutor to investigate the special counsel? Or maybe just an AG with a spine, some backbone.USN_Hokie wrote:I read an interesting argument earlier - that Mueller's team's purpose isn't just to try and make some pretext for impeachment of Trump, but also (and possibly primarily) to either cover up / manipulate evidence of the Obama administration's wrongdoing, or (more likely) to craft an argument for defense. After all, they're looking at the same information which would be used to prosecute the Obama administration.oaktonhokie wrote:I am a little surprised, swabbie.
I assumed that they didn't contest michigan, wisconsin and pennyslvania because they are the ones who cheated and they didn't want that to be revealed.
But it would be the height of arrogance and i guess perfectly in keeping with socialism, to believe that buried under the excrement of two tons of socialist corruption from the campaign, there may be....MAY BE a nugget of republican wrongdoing. Or something that can be spun into wrong doing. And the assumption that everyone will ignore the two tons of excrement because the media tells them to keep looking for the R mischief, is either absurdly stupid or absurdly arrogant.
Why isn't obama putting the brakes on this? Or holder or the cheats at the irs or the deep state? My guess is that they figure the deep state can destroy, cover up or bury the corruption from obama, fat hillary, holder et al.
Pretty risky. The american people are stupid, but maybe not stupid enough...
USN_Hokie wrote:I've thought this from the beginning. They never thought he would win, so they weren't afraid to cheat. Now they need to create a shirt show so they can toss up their arms and say "let's just call it even" when the dust settles.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk