Seattle sez income isn't property...

Your Virginia Tech Politics and Religion source
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
PolyTech
Posts: 818
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:05 am

Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by PolyTech »

...so they can tax it, of course!

http://www.npr.org/2017/11/16/564650399 ... x-in-court


On the other side is Paul Lawrence, an attorney litigating the case on behalf of the city of Seattle.

"There's no provision in the state constitution that says you can't have an income tax," he said.

Instead, what's preventing a state income tax is an interpretation—a wrong interpretation, Lawrence says. Because, he says, income is not property.

"It comes to you, you then take it and turn it into property—whether it's a stock or bond or a piece of property—but it's a very different type of thing," he says.
#JusticeForNolan
HokieJoe
Posts: 13122
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:12 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Eclectic

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by HokieJoe »

Twisting definitions is the key to how socialists accomplish their goals. They're liars at heart.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
BigDave
Posts: 8012
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 11:20 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Republican

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by BigDave »

I love this:
Some business owners support the tax. Molly Moon's Homemade Ice Cream chain founder and CEO, Molly Moon Neitzel, is in favor of it to fund the city's pressing needs, like affordable housing, she says. She doesn't earn enough to be taxed ... ."
Isn't that special?

It's easy to be generous with other people's money.
Posted from my Commodore 64 using Tapatalk
PolyTech
Posts: 818
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:05 am

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by PolyTech »

So is it not property because it's an electronic transfer? If they paid in gold, is that then property? But if it's greenbacks, it's not property? Is a paper check property?
#JusticeForNolan
CFB Apologist
Posts: 3192
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:27 pm

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by CFB Apologist »

250K is not peanuts. That is a small/mid size company Pres/C Level salary, A dentist, anesthesiologist, Bank VP/Pres. etc. Joe software developer or joe amazon program manager is not making 250K base salary per year. Having said that, the tax is a shitshow and borderline socialist.
User avatar
Hokie CPA
Posts: 2634
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 am
Alma Mater: Norfolk Academy to Virginia Tech
Party: I reject your party
Location: Virginia Beach, VA

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by Hokie CPA »

So, if currency is not property, then it can't be a crime to take it from someone. Steal it all, Washingtonians! Rob your neighbors blind! The city of Seattle says it's not a crime!
I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican... if you refuse to consider alternatives to the two parties, you support the Status Quo and you are a major part of the problem.

Image
fatman
Posts: 2439
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 2:18 am

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by fatman »

This whole thing seems silly. Some minimal level of Gov't is required, I've yet to see a proposal for how to fund that outside of taxation, income is a natural source for tax collectors to collect against. Sounds like they need to go for a common sense approach and repeal the prohibition on income tax to end this silly debate.

The US Tech industry is heavily concentrated in about 2 dozen cities with heavily educated workforces. The tech industries are powering some pretty powerful income inequality to a point where you've started to see social issues cropping up. Seattle and SF have that problem worse than most.
ElbertoHokie
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 4:24 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Independent

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by ElbertoHokie »

BigDave wrote:I love this:
Some business owners support the tax. Molly Moon's Homemade Ice Cream chain founder and CEO, Molly Moon Neitzel, is in favor of it to fund the city's pressing needs, like affordable housing, she says. She doesn't earn enough to be taxed ... ."
Isn't that special?

It's easy to be generous with other people's money.

I think that the majority of people think this way. It's not special just to her. I've worked for both family run businesses and publicly traded ones. The family run businesses are waaaaay more stingy on day to day items than the publicly traded ones. All stems from your quote above.
User avatar
BigDave
Posts: 8012
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 11:20 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Republican

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by BigDave »

fatman wrote:This whole thing seems silly. Some minimal level of Gov't is required, I've yet to see a proposal for how to fund that outside of taxation, income is a natural source for tax collectors to collect against. Sounds like they need to go for a common sense approach and repeal the prohibition on income tax to end this silly debate.

The US Tech industry is heavily concentrated in about 2 dozen cities with heavily educated workforces. The tech industries are powering some pretty powerful income inequality to a point where you've started to see social issues cropping up. Seattle and SF have that problem worse than most.
Must city governments do just fine taxing real estate, possibly sales, and various kinds of registration.

The thing i absolutely detest is when there are a whole boatload of things that get taxed - I'd rather we have only an income tax AND NOTHING ELSE or only a sales tax AND NOTHING ELSE. That gives you transparency in taxation - they can't tinker with 20 different numbers and hide that they're raising your taxes.
Posted from my Commodore 64 using Tapatalk
HokieJoe
Posts: 13122
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:12 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Eclectic

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by HokieJoe »

BigDave wrote:
fatman wrote:This whole thing seems silly. Some minimal level of Gov't is required, I've yet to see a proposal for how to fund that outside of taxation, income is a natural source for tax collectors to collect against. Sounds like they need to go for a common sense approach and repeal the prohibition on income tax to end this silly debate.

The US Tech industry is heavily concentrated in about 2 dozen cities with heavily educated workforces. The tech industries are powering some pretty powerful income inequality to a point where you've started to see social issues cropping up. Seattle and SF have that problem worse than most.
Must city governments do just fine taxing real estate, possibly sales, and various kinds of registration.

The thing i absolutely detest is when there are a whole boatload of things that get taxed - I'd rather we have only an income tax AND NOTHING ELSE or only a sales tax AND NOTHING ELSE. That gives you transparency in taxation - they can't tinker with 20 different numbers and hide that they're raising your taxes.

Exactly.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
cwtcr hokie
Posts: 13399
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by cwtcr hokie »

fatman wrote:This whole thing seems silly. Some minimal level of Gov't is required, I've yet to see a proposal for how to fund that outside of taxation, income is a natural source for tax collectors to collect against. Sounds like they need to go for a common sense approach and repeal the prohibition on income tax to end this silly debate.

The US Tech industry is heavily concentrated in about 2 dozen cities with heavily educated workforces. The tech industries are powering some pretty powerful income inequality to a point where you've started to see social issues cropping up. Seattle and SF have that problem worse than most.
Dude, the state of WA has lots of tax, high sales tax and property tax, thus why they do not have an income tax in WA state. Of course that is not enough money as it is super easy to spend other people's money..... of course this whole crap show will collapse as the number of givers continues to decrease and the takers continue to increase. No local, state or fed entity can tax enough for them to say they have enough of our money.....you do see that don't you?
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by ip_law-hokie »

cwtcr hokie wrote:
fatman wrote:This whole thing seems silly. Some minimal level of Gov't is required, I've yet to see a proposal for how to fund that outside of taxation, income is a natural source for tax collectors to collect against. Sounds like they need to go for a common sense approach and repeal the prohibition on income tax to end this silly debate.

The US Tech industry is heavily concentrated in about 2 dozen cities with heavily educated workforces. The tech industries are powering some pretty powerful income inequality to a point where you've started to see social issues cropping up. Seattle and SF have that problem worse than most.
Dude, the state of WA has lots of tax, high sales tax and property tax, thus why they do not have an income tax in WA state. Of course that is not enough money as it is super easy to spend other people's money..... of course this whole crap show will collapse as the number of givers continues to decrease and the takers continue to increase. No local, state or fed entity can tax enough for them to say they have enough of our money.....you do see that don't you?
Is this why you support Trump and Congressional Republican attempts to add at least 1.5 Trillion to the deficit?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
cwtcr hokie
Posts: 13399
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by cwtcr hokie »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
fatman wrote:This whole thing seems silly. Some minimal level of Gov't is required, I've yet to see a proposal for how to fund that outside of taxation, income is a natural source for tax collectors to collect against. Sounds like they need to go for a common sense approach and repeal the prohibition on income tax to end this silly debate.

The US Tech industry is heavily concentrated in about 2 dozen cities with heavily educated workforces. The tech industries are powering some pretty powerful income inequality to a point where you've started to see social issues cropping up. Seattle and SF have that problem worse than most.
Dude, the state of WA has lots of tax, high sales tax and property tax, thus why they do not have an income tax in WA state. Of course that is not enough money as it is super easy to spend other people's money..... of course this whole crap show will collapse as the number of givers continues to decrease and the takers continue to increase. No local, state or fed entity can tax enough for them to say they have enough of our money.....you do see that don't you?
Is this why you support Trump and Congressional Republican attempts to add at least 1.5 Trillion to the deficit?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
it has been explained to you at least 20 times, sorry you are not very smart
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by ip_law-hokie »

cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
fatman wrote:This whole thing seems silly. Some minimal level of Gov't is required, I've yet to see a proposal for how to fund that outside of taxation, income is a natural source for tax collectors to collect against. Sounds like they need to go for a common sense approach and repeal the prohibition on income tax to end this silly debate.

The US Tech industry is heavily concentrated in about 2 dozen cities with heavily educated workforces. The tech industries are powering some pretty powerful income inequality to a point where you've started to see social issues cropping up. Seattle and SF have that problem worse than most.
Dude, the state of WA has lots of tax, high sales tax and property tax, thus why they do not have an income tax in WA state. Of course that is not enough money as it is super easy to spend other people's money..... of course this whole crap show will collapse as the number of givers continues to decrease and the takers continue to increase. No local, state or fed entity can tax enough for them to say they have enough of our money.....you do see that don't you?
Is this why you support Trump and Congressional Republican attempts to add at least 1.5 Trillion to the deficit?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
it has been explained to you at least 20 times, sorry you are not very smart
that must be it.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
HokieJoe
Posts: 13122
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:12 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Eclectic

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by HokieJoe »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
fatman wrote:This whole thing seems silly. Some minimal level of Gov't is required, I've yet to see a proposal for how to fund that outside of taxation, income is a natural source for tax collectors to collect against. Sounds like they need to go for a common sense approach and repeal the prohibition on income tax to end this silly debate.

The US Tech industry is heavily concentrated in about 2 dozen cities with heavily educated workforces. The tech industries are powering some pretty powerful income inequality to a point where you've started to see social issues cropping up. Seattle and SF have that problem worse than most.
Dude, the state of WA has lots of tax, high sales tax and property tax, thus why they do not have an income tax in WA state. Of course that is not enough money as it is super easy to spend other people's money..... of course this whole crap show will collapse as the number of givers continues to decrease and the takers continue to increase. No local, state or fed entity can tax enough for them to say they have enough of our money.....you do see that don't you?
Is this why you support Trump and Congressional Republican attempts to add at least 1.5 Trillion to the deficit?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Odumbo added how much to the deficit? ~$9 Trillion was it?
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by ip_law-hokie »

HokieJoe wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
fatman wrote:This whole thing seems silly. Some minimal level of Gov't is required, I've yet to see a proposal for how to fund that outside of taxation, income is a natural source for tax collectors to collect against. Sounds like they need to go for a common sense approach and repeal the prohibition on income tax to end this silly debate.

The US Tech industry is heavily concentrated in about 2 dozen cities with heavily educated workforces. The tech industries are powering some pretty powerful income inequality to a point where you've started to see social issues cropping up. Seattle and SF have that problem worse than most.
Dude, the state of WA has lots of tax, high sales tax and property tax, thus why they do not have an income tax in WA state. Of course that is not enough money as it is super easy to spend other people's money..... of course this whole crap show will collapse as the number of givers continues to decrease and the takers continue to increase. No local, state or fed entity can tax enough for them to say they have enough of our money.....you do see that don't you?
Is this why you support Trump and Congressional Republican attempts to add at least 1.5 Trillion to the deficit?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Odumbo added how much to the deficit? ~$9 Trillion was it?
OK. Was it wrong then and right now? What’s your point?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
HokieJoe
Posts: 13122
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:12 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Eclectic

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by HokieJoe »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
fatman wrote:This whole thing seems silly. Some minimal level of Gov't is required, I've yet to see a proposal for how to fund that outside of taxation, income is a natural source for tax collectors to collect against. Sounds like they need to go for a common sense approach and repeal the prohibition on income tax to end this silly debate.

The US Tech industry is heavily concentrated in about 2 dozen cities with heavily educated workforces. The tech industries are powering some pretty powerful income inequality to a point where you've started to see social issues cropping up. Seattle and SF have that problem worse than most.
Dude, the state of WA has lots of tax, high sales tax and property tax, thus why they do not have an income tax in WA state. Of course that is not enough money as it is super easy to spend other people's money..... of course this whole crap show will collapse as the number of givers continues to decrease and the takers continue to increase. No local, state or fed entity can tax enough for them to say they have enough of our money.....you do see that don't you?
Is this why you support Trump and Congressional Republican attempts to add at least 1.5 Trillion to the deficit?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Odumbo added how much to the deficit? ~$9 Trillion was it?
OK. Was it wrong then and right now? What’s your point?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

My point is pointing out hypocrisy. I don't remember you (or anyone on the left) saying a word about the deficit when Odumbo was spinning the debt clock uncontrollably.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
HokieHam
Posts: 26373
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by HokieHam »

HokieJoe wrote:My point is pointing out hypocrisy. I don't remember you (or anyone on the left) saying a word about the deficit when Odumbo was spinning the debt clock uncontrollably.
They were too busy saying how great Obeezycare would be at saving us $.....
Image
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."

ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by ip_law-hokie »

HokieJoe wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
fatman wrote:This whole thing seems silly. Some minimal level of Gov't is required, I've yet to see a proposal for how to fund that outside of taxation, income is a natural source for tax collectors to collect against. Sounds like they need to go for a common sense approach and repeal the prohibition on income tax to end this silly debate.

The US Tech industry is heavily concentrated in about 2 dozen cities with heavily educated workforces. The tech industries are powering some pretty powerful income inequality to a point where you've started to see social issues cropping up. Seattle and SF have that problem worse than most.
Dude, the state of WA has lots of tax, high sales tax and property tax, thus why they do not have an income tax in WA state. Of course that is not enough money as it is super easy to spend other people's money..... of course this whole crap show will collapse as the number of givers continues to decrease and the takers continue to increase. No local, state or fed entity can tax enough for them to say they have enough of our money.....you do see that don't you?
Is this why you support Trump and Congressional Republican attempts to add at least 1.5 Trillion to the deficit?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Odumbo added how much to the deficit? ~$9 Trillion was it?
OK. Was it wrong then and right now? What’s your point?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
As for me, you should have paid more attention then.

but are you no better than "you did it, so I am too?" Do you have any principals, or just shills for the party and Trump? Are you no better than those you denigrate?


My point is pointing out hypocrisy. I don't remember you (or anyone on the left) saying a word about the deficit when Odumbo was spinning the debt clock uncontrollably.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
HokieHam
Posts: 26373
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by HokieHam »

Pot.....meet kettle.
Image
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."

ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by ip_law-hokie »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
HokieJoe wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote: Dude, the state of WA has lots of tax, high sales tax and property tax, thus why they do not have an income tax in WA state. Of course that is not enough money as it is super easy to spend other people's money..... of course this whole crap show will collapse as the number of givers continues to decrease and the takers continue to increase. No local, state or fed entity can tax enough for them to say they have enough of our money.....you do see that don't you?
Is this why you support Trump and Congressional Republican attempts to add at least 1.5 Trillion to the deficit?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Odumbo added how much to the deficit? ~$9 Trillion was it?
OK. Was it wrong then and right now? What’s your point?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
As for me, you should have paid more attention then.

but are you no better than "you did it, so I am too?" Do you have any principals, or just shills for the party and Trump? Are you no better than those you denigrate?


My point is pointing out hypocrisy. I don't remember you (or anyone on the left) saying a word about the deficit when Odumbo was spinning the debt clock uncontrollably.
OK. Do you have any thoughts on the 1.5T increase?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
133743Hokie
Posts: 11220
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by 133743Hokie »

BigDave wrote:
fatman wrote:This whole thing seems silly. Some minimal level of Gov't is required, I've yet to see a proposal for how to fund that outside of taxation, income is a natural source for tax collectors to collect against. Sounds like they need to go for a common sense approach and repeal the prohibition on income tax to end this silly debate.

The US Tech industry is heavily concentrated in about 2 dozen cities with heavily educated workforces. The tech industries are powering some pretty powerful income inequality to a point where you've started to see social issues cropping up. Seattle and SF have that problem worse than most.
Must city governments do just fine taxing real estate, possibly sales, and various kinds of registration.

The thing i absolutely detest is when there are a whole boatload of things that get taxed - I'd rather we have only an income tax AND NOTHING ELSE or only a sales tax AND NOTHING ELSE. That gives you transparency in taxation - they can't tinker with 20 different numbers and hide that they're raising your taxes.
Taxing personal property is a way to tax the rich and leave the poor alone. A big car, a new car? Then higher value and more tax. A bigger house? Then a higher tax. You own other things like motorcycles or boats? Also taxed. That's all it is, just a means to extract more tax revenue from those that have money.
User avatar
RiverguyVT
Posts: 30268
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by RiverguyVT »

fatman wrote:This whole thing seems silly. Some minimal level of Gov't is required, I've yet to see a proposal for how to fund that outside of taxation, income is a natural source for tax collectors to collect against. Sounds like they need to go for a common sense approach and repeal the prohibition on income tax to end this silly debate.

The US Tech industry is heavily concentrated in about 2 dozen cities with heavily educated workforces. The tech industries are powering some pretty powerful income inequality to a point where you've started to see social issues cropping up. Seattle and SF have that problem worse than most.
Is income property?
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
User avatar
USN_Hokie
Posts: 30831
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:58 pm
Party: Draintheswamp

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by USN_Hokie »

Seattle’s income tax on the wealthy is illegal, judge rules

The city had argued that its tax would apply to “total income” instead of net. The city also described it as an excise tax, imposed on those who live in Seattle in the same way excise taxes are imposed on companies that do business in the city.

The judge disagreed.

“ … the City’s tax, which is labeled ‘Income Tax,’ is exactly that,” he wrote. “It cannot be restyled as an ‘excise tax’ on the … ‘privileges’ of receiving revenue in Seattle or choosing to live in Seattle.”

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-ne ... dge-rules/
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Seattle sez income isn't property...

Post by ip_law-hokie »

RiverguyVT wrote:
fatman wrote:This whole thing seems silly. Some minimal level of Gov't is required, I've yet to see a proposal for how to fund that outside of taxation, income is a natural source for tax collectors to collect against. Sounds like they need to go for a common sense approach and repeal the prohibition on income tax to end this silly debate.

The US Tech industry is heavily concentrated in about 2 dozen cities with heavily educated workforces. The tech industries are powering some pretty powerful income inequality to a point where you've started to see social issues cropping up. Seattle and SF have that problem worse than most.
Is income property?
Fatman’s point is that their constitution should be amended to avoid the mental gymnastics.

To me, earned income is akin to an annuity (t=0) and thus property. But good arguments can be made on each side.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
Post Reply