So you're still on Ruuuuuuusa?ip_law-hokie wrote:No you sound confused. Because he also said he was in some greasy shirt. He’s said lots of things. We’ll see what he says before Congress.USN_Hokie wrote:You sound confused. Bannon just said Don Jr. is a "Patriot and a good man."ip_law-hokie wrote:You guys would not have noticed if Axelrod had called a meeting between Obama and Russia “treasonous.” I got it.USN_Hokie wrote:They're a lost cause, unfortunately. But, maybe something for their wives' children...awesome guy wrote:We need a male finishing school for them so they can learn about manhood from a man.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Be patient Cap’n. This is just getting started.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bannon in the headlines again.
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30315
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
The 1980s called and wants its foreign policy back... yeah?
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
Better start chilling the ice pack.ip_law-hokie wrote:No you sound confused. Because he also said he was in some greasy shirt. He’s said lots of things. We’ll see what he says before Congress.USN_Hokie wrote:You sound confused. Bannon just said Don Jr. is a "Patriot and a good man."ip_law-hokie wrote:You guys would not have noticed if Axelrod had called a meeting between Obama and Russia “treasonous.” I got it.USN_Hokie wrote:They're a lost cause, unfortunately. But, maybe something for their wives' children...awesome guy wrote:We need a male finishing school for them so they can learn about manhood from a man.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Be patient Cap’n. This is just getting started.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
OK.USN_Hokie wrote:Better start chilling the ice pack.ip_law-hokie wrote:No you sound confused. Because he also said he was in some greasy shirt. He’s said lots of things. We’ll see what he says before Congress.USN_Hokie wrote:You sound confused. Bannon just said Don Jr. is a "Patriot and a good man."ip_law-hokie wrote:You guys would not have noticed if Axelrod had called a meeting between Obama and Russia “treasonous.” I got it.USN_Hokie wrote:They're a lost cause, unfortunately. But, maybe something for their wives' children...awesome guy wrote:We need a male finishing school for them so they can learn about manhood from a man.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Be patient Cap’n. This is just getting started.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30315
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
Why would he? Obama and Axelrod loved the Russians. Oh, and they were very flexible.ip_law-hokie wrote:You guys would not have noticed if Axelrod had called a meeting between Obama and Russia “treasonous.” I got it.USN_Hokie wrote:They're a lost cause, unfortunately. But, maybe something for their wives' children...awesome guy wrote:We need a male finishing school for them so they can learn about manhood from a man.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.RiverguyVT wrote:The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.
2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.
-
- Posts: 367
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 5:25 pm
- Alma Mater: VT
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
He'll be back, you can't keep Hokie great Steve Bannon down for long.HokieFanDC wrote:1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.RiverguyVT wrote:The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.
2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30315
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.HokieFanDC wrote:1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.RiverguyVT wrote:The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.
2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
Has Bannon denied making the "treasonous" statement? Or the statements about JK and his greasy excrement? He's walked them back, but I don't believe he's denied making them.RiverguyVT wrote:It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.HokieFanDC wrote:1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.RiverguyVT wrote:The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.
2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.RiverguyVT wrote:It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.HokieFanDC wrote:1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.RiverguyVT wrote:The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.
2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.
As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimesHokieFanDC wrote:That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.RiverguyVT wrote:It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.HokieFanDC wrote:1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.RiverguyVT wrote:The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.
2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.
As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
Where did I say I believed everything?cwtcr hokie wrote:please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimesHokieFanDC wrote:That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.RiverguyVT wrote:It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.HokieFanDC wrote:1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.RiverguyVT wrote:The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.
2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.
As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.
Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn itHokieFanDC wrote:Where did I say I believed everything?cwtcr hokie wrote:please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimesHokieFanDC wrote:That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.RiverguyVT wrote:It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.HokieFanDC wrote:1) It was always a nothingburger because what he said not new or a revelation.RiverguyVT wrote:The more Bannon explains himself, the more this becomes a nothing burger. You were right.
2) He’s not explaining, he’s walking it back to try to mantain some form of relevance. Seems unlikely though. He was already sliding quickly to the bottom of his turd pile.
As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.
Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
Where did I say I believed everything?cwtcr hokie wrote:The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn itHokieFanDC wrote:Where did I say I believed everything?cwtcr hokie wrote:please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimesHokieFanDC wrote:That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.RiverguyVT wrote:
It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.
As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.
Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
yes repeating an opinion is fact, fer sureHokieFanDC wrote:Where did I say I believed everything?cwtcr hokie wrote:The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn itHokieFanDC wrote:Where did I say I believed everything?cwtcr hokie wrote:please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimesHokieFanDC wrote:That's fine. I don't see how Bannon saying the same thing that lots of other people have said, is meaningful. The Trumpers aren't going to change their minds b/c of it, they just attack Bannon. And the people who hate Trump aren't getting anything new. As for the author, I agree, but Bannon hasn't disputed that anything in the book is false.RiverguyVT wrote:
It was indeed new, because it was coming from someone with in trumps camp. Now, we are coming to understand that the author is not credible in his writing, so that changes things. As such, I very much dispute your number one. As for number two, The story is indeed being walked back. Other than his initial support for Trump, I am not sure what your major issue is with Bannon… But it appears to have very much clouded your vision one this story.
As for Bannon himself, I find nothing to like about him at all. Watching him during his rally speeches for Roy Moore was hilarious. He did nothing but talk trash about other people, while supporting a fruitcake. I'm not sure what decent person would find appealing about him.
Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
What I'm repeating is that I don't believe everything, ie I'm not IGNORING THAT.cwtcr hokie wrote:yes repeating an opinion is fact, fer sureHokieFanDC wrote:Where did I say I believed everything?cwtcr hokie wrote:The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn itHokieFanDC wrote:Where did I say I believed everything?cwtcr hokie wrote:
please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes
Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
And I asked your opinion, twice now. Maybe 3rd time is the charm. Do you think the statements attributed to Bannon are lies. If so, then why hasn't he said they are lies?
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
HokieFanDC wrote:What I'm repeating is that I don't believe everything, ie I'm not IGNORING THAT.cwtcr hokie wrote:yes repeating an opinion is fact, fer sureHokieFanDC wrote:Where did I say I believed everything?cwtcr hokie wrote:The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn itHokieFanDC wrote:Where did I say I believed everything?cwtcr hokie wrote:
please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes
Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
And I asked your opinion, twice now. Maybe 3rd time is the charm. Do you think the statements attributed to Bannon are lies. If so, then why hasn't he said they are lies?
You're a trip, DC. Tell us again how the Trump Dossier should be taken as gospel unless he can disprove it, or whatever garbage you were spouting at the time. I'll let the savvy posters track down your messy posts about that.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
The next time I tell you how the dossier should be taken as gospel, will be the first time I've said that.miles wrote:HokieFanDC wrote:What I'm repeating is that I don't believe everything, ie I'm not IGNORING THAT.cwtcr hokie wrote:yes repeating an opinion is fact, fer sureHokieFanDC wrote:Where did I say I believed everything?cwtcr hokie wrote:The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn itHokieFanDC wrote:
Where did I say I believed everything?
Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
And I asked your opinion, twice now. Maybe 3rd time is the charm. Do you think the statements attributed to Bannon are lies. If so, then why hasn't he said they are lies?
You're a trip, DC. Tell us again how the Trump Dossier should be taken as gospel unless he can disprove it, or whatever garbage you were spouting at the time. I'll let the savvy posters track down your messy posts about that.
You should let the savvy posters, and the not so savvy posters, handle all things related to this board, because you are clueless about 100% of what happens here.
Happy New Years!!!
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
I'm pretty sure you just admitted you're a poster with excrement for brains. Reminds me of the time my little brother absolutely embarrassed himself with the boyhood truth in a fit of rage by telling a neighbor kid to suck his "little" d**k. It was a hoot, now we have the time where miles said I'll let the posters who aren't complete idiots help me out by performing a simple task that I am mentally unable to accomplish.miles wrote: I'll let the savvy posters track down your messy posts about that.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
That's a genetic trait. You just outed your family as having a small set of jewels.BG Hokie wrote:I'm pretty sure you just admitted you're a poster with excrement for brains. Reminds me of the time my little brother absolutely embarrassed himself with the boyhood truth in a fit of rage by telling a neighbor kid to suck his "little" d**k. It was a hoot, now we have the time where miles said I'll let the posters who aren't complete idiots help me out by performing a simple task that I am mentally unable to accomplish.miles wrote: I'll let the savvy posters track down your messy posts about that.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30315
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
I’d call that a faulty conclusion. One has nothing to do with the other. Miles saying he’d leave it to others to track down old archived posts doesn’t in any way mean he cannot himself. It means exactly what he said...that he’d leave it to others. Motive is assumed.BG Hokie wrote:I'm pretty sure you just admitted you're a poster with excrement for brains. Reminds me of the time my little brother absolutely embarrassed himself with the boyhood truth in a fit of rage by telling a neighbor kid to suck his "little" d**k. It was a hoot, now we have the time where miles said I'll let the posters who aren't complete idiots help me out by performing a simple task that I am mentally unable to accomplish.miles wrote: I'll let the savvy posters track down your messy posts about that.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
Sloppy Steve is apparently out at Breitbart. No choice really. Can’t have that joke associated with your brand after Trump dunked on him.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
from the remarks I have seen those are his opinions, I have no idea of knowing what Bannon beleives or notHokieFanDC wrote:What I'm repeating is that I don't believe everything, ie I'm not IGNORING THAT.cwtcr hokie wrote:yes repeating an opinion is fact, fer sureHokieFanDC wrote:Where did I say I believed everything?cwtcr hokie wrote:The whole book is not Bannon, several items in the book have been proven false, but IGNORE THAT, the gossip writer who wrote the book says its all true darn it. FYI, when someone says that a meeting is treasonous, that is his opinion, that is not a fact. I know it is hard for some to know what is what these days. There was a meeting, it was nothing and nothing came of it. And the only people that actually know what was said in the meeting (the UK guy and the Russian women deny everything) darn itHokieFanDC wrote:Where did I say I believed everything?cwtcr hokie wrote:
please ignore that many items in the Wolff book have already been proven to be false.... but believe everything else, this gossip writer only lies sometimes
Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
Bannon has had a while to tell the world that the things attributed to him in the book are false...and he hasn't done that. I'll believe them until Bannon tells us they're false.
Do you think that the statements attributed to Bannon are lies??
And I asked your opinion, twice now. Maybe 3rd time is the charm. Do you think the statements attributed to Bannon are lies. If so, then why hasn't he said they are lies?
Re: Bannon in the headlines again.
Seeing that Sloppy Steve is going to meet with Mueller. [emoji848]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead