Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
on his property. 6.75 million.
And it appears the court nailed it too.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mor ... 7da16dbd4e
And it appears the court nailed it too.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mor ... 7da16dbd4e
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
Acting out 6.75 million times.awesome guy wrote:Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.ip_law-hokie wrote:Acting out 6.75 million times.awesome guy wrote:Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
Got it.awesome guy wrote:Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.ip_law-hokie wrote:Acting out 6.75 million times.awesome guy wrote:Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
Explain it thenip_law-hokie wrote:Got it.awesome guy wrote:Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.ip_law-hokie wrote:Acting out 6.75 million times.awesome guy wrote:Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
Legally, you should start with the VARA.awesome guy wrote:Explain it thenip_law-hokie wrote:Got it.awesome guy wrote:Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.ip_law-hokie wrote:Acting out 6.75 million times.awesome guy wrote:Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Practically, you shouldn’t disobey a judge.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
Uh huhip_law-hokie wrote:Legally, you should start with the VARA.awesome guy wrote:Explain it thenip_law-hokie wrote:Got it.awesome guy wrote:Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.ip_law-hokie wrote:Acting out 6.75 million times.awesome guy wrote:Not sure how a sane person could support the courts here. They're just mad and acting out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Practically, you shouldn’t disobey a judge.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
It was more for the grownups, but good work.awesome guy wrote:Uh huhip_law-hokie wrote:Legally, you should start with the VARA.awesome guy wrote:Explain it thenip_law-hokie wrote:Got it.awesome guy wrote:Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.ip_law-hokie wrote: Acting out 6.75 million times.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Practically, you shouldn’t disobey a judge.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
Another in depth/inept explanation.ip_law-hokie wrote:It was more for the grownups, but good work.awesome guy wrote:Uh huhip_law-hokie wrote:Legally, you should start with the VARA.awesome guy wrote:Explain it thenip_law-hokie wrote:Got it.awesome guy wrote:Yep, socialist temper tantrum. There's no reasonable explanation for their judgement.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Practically, you shouldn’t disobey a judge.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
awesome guy wrote:Another in depth/inept explanation.ip_law-hokie wrote:It was more for the grownups, but good work.awesome guy wrote:Uh huhip_law-hokie wrote:Legally, you should start with the VARA.awesome guy wrote:Explain it thenip_law-hokie wrote: Got it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Practically, you shouldn’t disobey a judge.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
[quote="ip_law-hokie"][/quote]
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 11220
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.
The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.
The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
IP should be cautious about supporting lawsuits for meanness and pettiness. Some gangster could also tag his fence around his 2x10 backyard and then he can't paint it over or tear it down.133743Hokie wrote:Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.
The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.
No way this stands. I think it's time we impeach these kook judges, like the one that blocked DACA dissolution, as the judicial branch is out of control. Their power has gone to their heads.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
F the 'artist(s)' and F the community. It's a personal property issue. End of story.133743Hokie wrote:Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.
The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
-
- Posts: 3192
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:27 pm
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
Apparently Jeter wants to remove that hideous mural in centerfield of MArlins Park that looks to be designed by a blind 6 year old, but he can't because it is considered "art" or some bullshit. This sounds like much of the same. 99% of NYC is a craphole, anyway.ip_law-hokie wrote:on his property. 6.75 million.
And it appears the court nailed it too.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mor ... 7da16dbd4e
-
- Posts: 3192
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:27 pm
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
So, If I read correctly, if he would have just torn down the buildings as planned, as as his right as property owner, there would have been no issue?? LOL- tear down graffit- no big deal, oh well "artist" too bad your art was torn down for high rises.. BUT PAINT over it before tear down?? nope, that will cost you 6.7 million. LOL- the judge should give that money to the thousands of starving kids in NYC.
-
- Posts: 3192
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:27 pm
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
Agree- if he would have just set a bulldozer to them one day, no issue by law. But to paint over them..blasphemy apparently. Ridiculous133743Hokie wrote:Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.
The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.
-
- Posts: 11324
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 8:48 pm
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
That happens to be high quality outdoor aerosol art.
ip_law-hokie wrote:on his property. 6.75 million.
And it appears the court nailed it too.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mor ... 7da16dbd4e
If you bend over backwards long enough,
eventually you'll fall down.
eventually you'll fall down.
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30268
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
ip_law-hokie wrote:on his property. 6.75 million.
And it appears the court nailed it too.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mor ... 7da16dbd4e
Life ain’t always what it seems when you come from out of town...huh-huh—huh-huh.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
You’d be wrong.HokieJoe wrote:F the 'artist(s)' and F the community. It's a personal property issue. End of story.133743Hokie wrote:Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.
The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
That’s incorrect.CFB Apologist wrote:Agree- if he would have just set a bulldozer to them one day, no issue by law. But to paint over them..blasphemy apparently. Ridiculous133743Hokie wrote:Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.
The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
You and DeBlasio have a lot in common comrade.ip_law-hokie wrote:You’d be wrong.HokieJoe wrote:F the 'artist(s)' and F the community. It's a personal property issue. End of story.133743Hokie wrote:Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.
The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
Indeed. Two tall, powerful yet benevolent white men.awesome guy wrote:You and DeBlasio have a lot in common comrade.ip_law-hokie wrote:You’d be wrong.HokieJoe wrote:F the 'artist(s)' and F the community. It's a personal property issue. End of story.133743Hokie wrote:Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.
The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My neighbors in Harlem complimen me that I look like a young Bill DeBlasio.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Liberal Court fines landowner for removing graffiti
Weird control freaks with more contempt than ability. Yep, twinsies.ip_law-hokie wrote:Indeed. Two tall, powerful yet benevolent white men.awesome guy wrote:You and DeBlasio have a lot in common comrade.ip_law-hokie wrote:You’d be wrong.HokieJoe wrote:F the 'artist(s)' and F the community. It's a personal property issue. End of story.133743Hokie wrote:Only in NYC would a judge rule in favor of graffiti artists over the property owner because of hurt feelings. Essentially, the ruling didn't say he didn't have a right to paint over the graffiti and to ultimately tear down the building, but rather that he was mean and spiteful (how dare they tell him what he can so with his building!) and didn't consider the feelings of the artists and the community.
The building owner needs to go over this bleeding hearts head all the way to the supreme court if necessary.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My neighbors in Harlem complimen me that I look like a young Bill DeBlasio.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.