San Jose reviewing sites for homeless neighborhoods
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
-
- Posts: 3192
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:27 pm
Re: San Jose reviewing sites for homeless neighborhoods
“This will increase neighborhood crime, blight, poor sanitation and threatens safety and health,” worried Sue Halloway.. bless her liberal, tolerant, progressive California heart.
- Major Kong
- Posts: 15765
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:35 pm
- Alma Mater: Ferrum VT ASU
- Party: Independent
- Location: Somewhere between Marion and Seven Mile Ford
Re: San Jose reviewing sites for homeless neighborhoods
Do you know the way to San Jose?
I only post using 100% recycled electrons.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: San Jose reviewing sites for homeless neighborhoods
wow, nothing about the morons in kali amazes me anymore....so effing stupid!
The funny part, since the city is involved it will cost them $150k per box to put up a tool shed, have fun taxpayers!!
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: San Jose reviewing sites for homeless neighborhoods
I support this. The homeless do need shelter and it's reasonable accommodation. It's a better option than tent cities as it'll be managed and can provide water for showers, which will help them find work.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: San Jose reviewing sites for homeless neighborhoods
I would support if the city would not be involved, the article already says they have to do an environmental impact study, the cost is going to be sooo out of whackawesome guy wrote:I support this. The homeless do need shelter and it's reasonable accommodation. It's a better option than tent cities as it'll be managed and can provide water for showers, which will help them find work.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: San Jose reviewing sites for homeless neighborhoods
Yeah, screw that. But it's an idea worth evaluating.cwtcr hokie wrote:I would support if the city would not be involved, the article already says they have to do an environmental impact study, the cost is going to be sooo out of whackawesome guy wrote:I support this. The homeless do need shelter and it's reasonable accommodation. It's a better option than tent cities as it'll be managed and can provide water for showers, which will help them find work.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: San Jose reviewing sites for homeless neighborhoods
It is funny that the people who don't want to have the police get rid of them, now don't want them living near them in tiny houses.awesome guy wrote:I support this. The homeless do need shelter and it's reasonable accommodation. It's a better option than tent cities as it'll be managed and can provide water for showers, which will help them find work.
But, yeah, it's an idea worth trying. First priority to veterans, and the completely crazy people should be taken somewhere else for help.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: San Jose reviewing sites for homeless neighborhoods
It is a feel good idea, but after a few months it will be the same trash heap as the tent cities, anybody with any sense knows thatHokieFanDC wrote:It is funny that the people who don't want to have the police get rid of them, now don't want them living near them in tiny houses.awesome guy wrote:I support this. The homeless do need shelter and it's reasonable accommodation. It's a better option than tent cities as it'll be managed and can provide water for showers, which will help them find work.
But, yeah, it's an idea worth trying. First priority to veterans, and the completely crazy people should be taken somewhere else for help.
Re: San Jose reviewing sites for homeless neighborhoods
The vast majority are crazy.HokieFanDC wrote:It is funny that the people who don't want to have the police get rid of them, now don't want them living near them in tiny houses.awesome guy wrote:I support this. The homeless do need shelter and it's reasonable accommodation. It's a better option than tent cities as it'll be managed and can provide water for showers, which will help them find work.
But, yeah, it's an idea worth trying. First priority to veterans, and the completely crazy people should be taken somewhere else for help.
- Bay_area_Hokie
- Posts: 6033
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:53 am
- Alma Mater: VT
- Party: Surprise Party
Re: San Jose reviewing sites for homeless neighborhoods
What could go wrong?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
“With God there are only individuals” - Philosopher Nicolas Gomez Davila