LOL. Some observations:HokieFanDC wrote:We've been through this before. None of them were qualified.USN_Hokie wrote:Fascinating. But, you thought Egg McMuffin the CIA agent was qualified? Can you even tell me his running mate off the top of your head?HokieFanDC wrote: I knew that Trump would be a clown show who had no idea how to run a country, when I didn't vote for him. I knew that McMuffin wouldn't win when I voted for him.
I was right on both counts. Next.
Also, since you voted for someone you knew wouldn't win (Egg McMuffin) against someone you didn't want to win (Trump), isn't that really a defacto endorsement of Hillary?
What do you stand for? Men who stand for nothing (a man who stands for nothing, stands for everything) or make pussy protest votes are the worst type of men. I hope that's not your philosophy.
Trump is a rich, classless, douchebag, and a poor leader. He has some good economic ideas, but that's it.
Hillary...too many things to list that show her lack of qualities.
Not voting for Hillary or Trump, isn't an endorsement of Hillary, just like it isn't an endorsement of Trump. That argument is just plain stupid.
What I stand for is voting for someone who is a decent human being, who shares my values and morals. Neither of the candidates that was going to win, is even close to being worth my vote. McMullin was at least in the ballpark. I also strongly think we need more than 2 parties, and that if enough people actually voted their conscience, not party line sheep, we would have a chance of getting rid of our 2 party system.
The worst type of ppl are the ones that always find a way to convince themselves (against their own beliefs and values) that voting the party line is the right thing to do. It's not.
1. You think being rich makes someone not qualified to be President.
2. Voting for candidate C who takes votes away from candidate A is a defacto endorsement/support for candidate B. If we assume you are of average intelligence (I think you are), then we can assume you understand this.
3. If everyone voted for someone who shares their personal values, we wouldn't have any consensus on leadership. It's really an absurd standard.
I don't care if the guy engineering my deck shares my values, I care that he's a good engineer. Besides being impossible to reach a consensus, it's also irrelevant to the qualities needed to be president.