Something Cohen did on his own apart from his duties for Trump is obviously not covered by attorney-client privilege ... but (at least one) problem is that they are using the pretense of investigating the payments as an excuse for seizing documents that ARE covered.HokieFanDC wrote:What attorney client privilege?
First, Trump says he knows nothing about the payments. No privilege on something he's not involved with.
Second, that privilege doesn't apply if it relates to any criminal or fraudulent activity.
Can we call this a coup yet?
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
Posted from my Commodore 64 using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
so where is the alleged bank fraud, he paid some pin cushion to shut up, not getting what is illegal about giving another human money. It happens every dayBigDave wrote:Something Cohen did on his own apart from his duties for Trump is obviously not covered by attorney-client privilege ... but (at least one) problem is that they are using the pretense of investigating the payments as an excuse for seizing documents that ARE covered.HokieFanDC wrote:What attorney client privilege?
First, Trump says he knows nothing about the payments. No privilege on something he's not involved with.
Second, that privilege doesn't apply if it relates to any criminal or fraudulent activity.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
Not sure that's the case. When they seize documents and communications, there is a separate group of people that goes through all the docs and determines which ones are related to the payments, which ones are covered by attorney client privilege, and which ones are not covered by attorney client privilege. These are people that are not involved with the case.BigDave wrote:Something Cohen did on his own apart from his duties for Trump is obviously not covered by attorney-client privilege ... but (at least one) problem is that they are using the pretense of investigating the payments as an excuse for seizing documents that ARE covered.HokieFanDC wrote:What attorney client privilege?
First, Trump says he knows nothing about the payments. No privilege on something he's not involved with.
Second, that privilege doesn't apply if it relates to any criminal or fraudulent activity.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
Any bets they're leaked? Your claims of protection is a farce.HokieFanDC wrote:Not sure that's the case. When they seize documents and communications, there is a separate group of people that goes through all the docs and determines which ones are related to the payments, which ones are covered by attorney client privilege, and which ones are not covered by attorney client privilege. These are people that are not involved with the case.BigDave wrote:Something Cohen did on his own apart from his duties for Trump is obviously not covered by attorney-client privilege ... but (at least one) problem is that they are using the pretense of investigating the payments as an excuse for seizing documents that ARE covered.HokieFanDC wrote:What attorney client privilege?
First, Trump says he knows nothing about the payments. No privilege on something he's not involved with.
Second, that privilege doesn't apply if it relates to any criminal or fraudulent activity.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
Nope, not taking bets, but it's a small team, so easy to source a leak. But, my "claims of protection" aren't a farce, it's just how it's done. You can make the claim that it's a farce in this situation, because you believe everything legal issue regarding Trump or his associates is a farce.awesome guy wrote:Any bets they're leaked? Your claims of protection is a farce.HokieFanDC wrote:Not sure that's the case. When they seize documents and communications, there is a separate group of people that goes through all the docs and determines which ones are related to the payments, which ones are covered by attorney client privilege, and which ones are not covered by attorney client privilege. These are people that are not involved with the case.BigDave wrote:Something Cohen did on his own apart from his duties for Trump is obviously not covered by attorney-client privilege ... but (at least one) problem is that they are using the pretense of investigating the payments as an excuse for seizing documents that ARE covered.HokieFanDC wrote:What attorney client privilege?
First, Trump says he knows nothing about the payments. No privilege on something he's not involved with.
Second, that privilege doesn't apply if it relates to any criminal or fraudulent activity.
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
HokieFanDC wrote:Not sure that's the case. When they seize documents and communications, there is a separate group of people that goes through all the docs and determines which ones are related to the payments, which ones are covered by attorney client privilege, and which ones are not covered by attorney client privilege. These are people that are not involved with the case.BigDave wrote:Something Cohen did on his own apart from his duties for Trump is obviously not covered by attorney-client privilege ... but (at least one) problem is that they are using the pretense of investigating the payments as an excuse for seizing documents that ARE covered.HokieFanDC wrote:What attorney client privilege?
First, Trump says he knows nothing about the payments. No privilege on something he's not involved with.
Second, that privilege doesn't apply if it relates to any criminal or fraudulent activity.
This was just a bullshiite excuse to see what they could see. Their predicate claim (Wusha, Wusha, Wusha) has no merit, so we get this clustercluck.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
can you imagine the uproar if they did this to Obummer, never mind that he actually did break the law and Thunder thighs also......still waiting on those raidsawesome guy wrote:Any bets they're leaked? Your claims of protection is a farce.HokieFanDC wrote:Not sure that's the case. When they seize documents and communications, there is a separate group of people that goes through all the docs and determines which ones are related to the payments, which ones are covered by attorney client privilege, and which ones are not covered by attorney client privilege. These are people that are not involved with the case.BigDave wrote:Something Cohen did on his own apart from his duties for Trump is obviously not covered by attorney-client privilege ... but (at least one) problem is that they are using the pretense of investigating the payments as an excuse for seizing documents that ARE covered.HokieFanDC wrote:What attorney client privilege?
First, Trump says he knows nothing about the payments. No privilege on something he's not involved with.
Second, that privilege doesn't apply if it relates to any criminal or fraudulent activity.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
The dreaded Obama/Clinton Pivot. Why is that your response to everything?cwtcr hokie wrote:can you imagine the uproar if they did this to Obummer, never mind that he actually did break the law and Thunder thighs also......still waiting on those raidsawesome guy wrote:Any bets they're leaked? Your claims of protection is a farce.HokieFanDC wrote:Not sure that's the case. When they seize documents and communications, there is a separate group of people that goes through all the docs and determines which ones are related to the payments, which ones are covered by attorney client privilege, and which ones are not covered by attorney client privilege. These are people that are not involved with the case.BigDave wrote:Something Cohen did on his own apart from his duties for Trump is obviously not covered by attorney-client privilege ... but (at least one) problem is that they are using the pretense of investigating the payments as an excuse for seizing documents that ARE covered.HokieFanDC wrote:What attorney client privilege?
First, Trump says he knows nothing about the payments. No privilege on something he's not involved with.
Second, that privilege doesn't apply if it relates to any criminal or fraudulent activity.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
Naw, it's a farce because it's an investigation looking for a crime. Total farce, everyone not blindly political can see that.HokieFanDC wrote:Nope, not taking bets, but it's a small team, so easy to source a leak. But, my "claims of protection" aren't a farce, it's just how it's done. You can make the claim that it's a farce in this situation, because you believe everything legal issue regarding Trump or his associates is a farce.awesome guy wrote:Any bets they're leaked? Your claims of protection is a farce.HokieFanDC wrote:Not sure that's the case. When they seize documents and communications, there is a separate group of people that goes through all the docs and determines which ones are related to the payments, which ones are covered by attorney client privilege, and which ones are not covered by attorney client privilege. These are people that are not involved with the case.BigDave wrote:Something Cohen did on his own apart from his duties for Trump is obviously not covered by attorney-client privilege ... but (at least one) problem is that they are using the pretense of investigating the payments as an excuse for seizing documents that ARE covered.HokieFanDC wrote:What attorney client privilege?
First, Trump says he knows nothing about the payments. No privilege on something he's not involved with.
Second, that privilege doesn't apply if it relates to any criminal or fraudulent activity.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
awesome guy wrote:Naw, it's a farce because it's an investigation looking for a crime. Total farce, everyone not blindly political can see that.HokieFanDC wrote:Nope, not taking bets, but it's a small team, so easy to source a leak. But, my "claims of protection" aren't a farce, it's just how it's done. You can make the claim that it's a farce in this situation, because you believe everything legal issue regarding Trump or his associates is a farce.awesome guy wrote:Any bets they're leaked? Your claims of protection is a farce.HokieFanDC wrote:Not sure that's the case. When they seize documents and communications, there is a separate group of people that goes through all the docs and determines which ones are related to the payments, which ones are covered by attorney client privilege, and which ones are not covered by attorney client privilege. These are people that are not involved with the case.BigDave wrote:Something Cohen did on his own apart from his duties for Trump is obviously not covered by attorney-client privilege ... but (at least one) problem is that they are using the pretense of investigating the payments as an excuse for seizing documents that ARE covered.HokieFanDC wrote:What attorney client privilege?
First, Trump says he knows nothing about the payments. No privilege on something he's not involved with.
Second, that privilege doesn't apply if it relates to any criminal or fraudulent activity.
You just reinforce what I said, "you believe everything legal issue regarding Trump or his associates is a farce."
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
Stop playing stupid, that's the opposite of what I said.HokieFanDC wrote:awesome guy wrote:Naw, it's a farce because it's an investigation looking for a crime. Total farce, everyone not blindly political can see that.HokieFanDC wrote:Nope, not taking bets, but it's a small team, so easy to source a leak. But, my "claims of protection" aren't a farce, it's just how it's done. You can make the claim that it's a farce in this situation, because you believe everything legal issue regarding Trump or his associates is a farce.awesome guy wrote:Any bets they're leaked? Your claims of protection is a farce.HokieFanDC wrote:Not sure that's the case. When they seize documents and communications, there is a separate group of people that goes through all the docs and determines which ones are related to the payments, which ones are covered by attorney client privilege, and which ones are not covered by attorney client privilege. These are people that are not involved with the case.BigDave wrote: Something Cohen did on his own apart from his duties for Trump is obviously not covered by attorney-client privilege ... but (at least one) problem is that they are using the pretense of investigating the payments as an excuse for seizing documents that ARE covered.
You just reinforce what I said, "you believe everything legal issue regarding Trump or his associates is a farce."
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
Now they're saying it had nothing to do with Stormy and it was the the stupid access Hollywood tape.HokieFanDC wrote: Setting up an LLC to hide the source of the payment, in order to hide that it was related to Trump activity, could be illegal.
On the other part, I'm not assuming that at all. But, not every communication between Trump and Cohen is privileged. Some is, some isn't.
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
That's the effing point. Two sets of laws.HokieFanDC wrote:The dreaded Obama/Clinton Pivot. Why is that your response to everything?cwtcr hokie wrote: can you imagine the uproar if they did this to Obummer, never mind that he actually did break the law and Thunder thighs also......still waiting on those raids
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
Will we be able to say **** after the Revolution?USN_Hokie wrote:That's the effing point. Two sets of laws.HokieFanDC wrote:The dreaded Obama/Clinton Pivot. Why is that your response to everything?cwtcr hokie wrote: can you imagine the uproar if they did this to Obummer, never mind that he actually did break the law and Thunder thighs also......still waiting on those raids
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
Will you be able to say more than two syllables?ip_law-hokie wrote:Will we be able to say **** after the Revolution?USN_Hokie wrote:That's the effing point. Two sets of laws.HokieFanDC wrote:The dreaded Obama/Clinton Pivot. Why is that your response to everything?cwtcr hokie wrote: can you imagine the uproar if they did this to Obummer, never mind that he actually did break the law and Thunder thighs also......still waiting on those raids
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
Able now.USN_Hokie wrote:Will you be able to say more than two syllables?ip_law-hokie wrote:Will we be able to say **** after the Revolution?USN_Hokie wrote:That's the effing point. Two sets of laws.HokieFanDC wrote:The dreaded Obama/Clinton Pivot. Why is that your response to everything?cwtcr hokie wrote: can you imagine the uproar if they did this to Obummer, never mind that he actually did break the law and Thunder thighs also......still waiting on those raids
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30299
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
HokieFanDC wrote:Not sure that's the case. When they seize documents and communications, there is a separate group of people that goes through all the docs and determines which ones are related to the payments, which ones are covered by attorney client privilege, and which ones are not covered by attorney client privilege. These are people that are not involved with the case.BigDave wrote:Something Cohen did on his own apart from his duties for Trump is obviously not covered by attorney-client privilege ... but (at least one) problem is that they are using the pretense of investigating the payments as an excuse for seizing documents that ARE covered.HokieFanDC wrote:What attorney client privilege?
First, Trump says he knows nothing about the payments. No privilege on something he's not involved with.
Second, that privilege doesn't apply if it relates to any criminal or fraudulent activity.
I’ve got a bridge. Worth millions. I’ll let you have it for a cool tree fitty.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30299
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
Agry.USN_Hokie wrote:That's the effing point. Two sets of laws.HokieFanDC wrote:The dreaded Obama/Clinton Pivot. Why is that your response to everything?cwtcr hokie wrote: can you imagine the uproar if they did this to Obummer, never mind that he actually did break the law and Thunder thighs also......still waiting on those raids
2 sets of laws.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
Hoof is drooling over a Trump appointee not including a 2nd tier subsidiary on his form, dead silence over Obama not even bothering to get clearances for his aids. Not to mention his candidate taking in hundreds of millions from foreign governments while secretary of state. They've lost the moral high ground to bitch about any of this.RiverguyVT wrote:Agry.USN_Hokie wrote:That's the effing point. Two sets of laws.HokieFanDC wrote:The dreaded Obama/Clinton Pivot. Why is that your response to everything?cwtcr hokie wrote: can you imagine the uproar if they did this to Obummer, never mind that he actually did break the law and Thunder thighs also......still waiting on those raids
2 sets of laws.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
except Hillary actually did break REAL laws and possibly Obummer in the FISA issues. So far we got that Trump likes sex.... shockingHokieFanDC wrote:The dreaded Obama/Clinton Pivot. Why is that your response to everything?cwtcr hokie wrote:can you imagine the uproar if they did this to Obummer, never mind that he actually did break the law and Thunder thighs also......still waiting on those raidsawesome guy wrote:Any bets they're leaked? Your claims of protection is a farce.HokieFanDC wrote:Not sure that's the case. When they seize documents and communications, there is a separate group of people that goes through all the docs and determines which ones are related to the payments, which ones are covered by attorney client privilege, and which ones are not covered by attorney client privilege. These are people that are not involved with the case.BigDave wrote:Something Cohen did on his own apart from his duties for Trump is obviously not covered by attorney-client privilege ... but (at least one) problem is that they are using the pretense of investigating the payments as an excuse for seizing documents that ARE covered.HokieFanDC wrote:What attorney client privilege?
First, Trump says he knows nothing about the payments. No privilege on something he's not involved with.
Second, that privilege doesn't apply if it relates to any criminal or fraudulent activity.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
ip_law-hokie wrote:Able now.USN_Hokie wrote:Will you be able to say more than two syllables?ip_law-hokie wrote:Will we be able to say **** after the Revolution?USN_Hokie wrote:That's the effing point. Two sets of laws.HokieFanDC wrote:The dreaded Obama/Clinton Pivot. Why is that your response to everything?cwtcr hokie wrote: can you imagine the uproar if they did this to Obummer, never mind that he actually did break the law and Thunder thighs also......still waiting on those raids
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- HooFighter
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 1:16 pm
- Party: all the time
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
I would've had my money on Junior.
Donald Trump is a stupid man's idea of a smart man, a poor man's idea of a rich man, and a weak man's idea of a strong man.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
so who is leaking the info from the raid, isn't that illegal?HooFighter wrote:I would've had my money on Junior.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
cwtcr hokie wrote:so who is leaking the info from the raid, isn't that illegal?HooFighter wrote:I would've had my money on Junior.
Ummm...that came from Cohen's lawyer. Granted, I wouldn't put any trust in a lawyer representing Cohen.
- HooFighter
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 1:16 pm
- Party: all the time
Re: Can we call this a coup yet?
Try again.cwtcr hokie wrote:so who is leaking the info from the raid, isn't that illegal?
Donald Trump is a stupid man's idea of a smart man, a poor man's idea of a rich man, and a weak man's idea of a strong man.